Temporal Changes in Allele Frequencies Provide Estimates of Population Bottleneck Size

Abstract: Monitoring temporal changes in genetic variation can provide estimates of effective population size (  Ne  ) that are useful for detecting population bottlenecks. We used Monte Carlo computer simulations to quantify the bias and precision of the Ne estimates obtained from temporal changes in allele frequencies at allozyme and microsatellite loci. The estimates of Ne overestimated the true Ne by 12–200% after 1–10 generations of a bottleneck of effective size 4. This magnitude of bias, however, is not likely to cause bottlenecks to go undetected or to cause misguided management recommendations. The bias was nearly negligible for bottlenecks of effective size ≥10, until approximately five bottleneck generations had passed. Three causes of the bias are the loss of alleles, the assumption that the increase in variance in allele frequencies with time is additive (instead of multiplicative), and the assumption that selfing can occur when it cannot. We derived a new equation that substantially reduces the bias. The precision of Ne estimates was sufficient that, when true Ne was 4, the 95% confidence interval bracketing a Ne estimate was <25 in 95% of 500 simulations (when only five microsatellite loci were monitored and when 30 individuals were sampled with a sampling interval of one generation). When the true Ne was 20, however, only 80% of the confidence intervals were <50 when we sampled 45 individuals and 20 microsatellite loci (i.e., loci with five alleles). High power to detect a bottleneck of effective size 4 can be achieved by monitoring only five microsatellite loci having five alleles each and sampling 30 individuals with a sampling interval of one generation. But achieving high power to detect bottlenecks of size Ne = 20 requires approximately 20 polymorphic microsatellite loci and 45 individuals with a one‐generation sampling interval.

[1]  G. Luikart,et al.  Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks via monitoring genetic change , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[2]  N. Ryman,et al.  TEMPORAL CHANGE OF MITOCHONDRIAL DNA HAPLOTYPE FREQUENCIES AND FEMALE EFFECTIVE SIZE IN A BROWN TROUT (SALMO TRUTTA) POPULATION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  I. Hanski,et al.  Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation , 1998, Nature.

[4]  L. Waits,et al.  Noninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[5]  Dara Newman,et al.  INCREASED PROBABILITY OF EXTINCTION DUE TO DECREASED GENETIC EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE: EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OF CLARKIA PULCHELLA , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  P. Leberg,et al.  Temporal Changes in Allele Frequencies and a Population's History of Severe Bottlenecks , 1996 .

[7]  R. Frankham Inbreeding and Extinction: A Threshold Effect , 1995 .

[8]  N. Ryman,et al.  Temporal allele frequency change and estimation of effective size in populations with overlapping generations. , 1995, Genetics.

[9]  R. Lande RISK OF POPULATION EXTINCTION FROM FIXATION OF NEW DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  L. Scott Mills,et al.  Demographic Consequences of Inbreeding in Remnant Populations , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[11]  J. Weber,et al.  Mutation of human short tandem repeats. , 1993, Human molecular genetics.

[12]  P. Leberg EFFECTS OF POPULATION BOTTLENECKS ON GENETIC DIVERSITY AS MEASURED BY ALLOZYME ELECTROPHORESIS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Conservation Genetics: Techniques and Fundamentals. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  P. Leberg,et al.  Influence of genetic variability on population growth: implications for conservation , 1990 .

[15]  R. Waples A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. , 1989, Genetics.

[16]  R. Lande Genetics and demography in biological conservation. , 1988, Science.

[17]  J. Crow,et al.  INBREEDING AND VARIANCE EFFECTIVE POPULATION NUMBERS , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  E. Pollak A new method for estimating the effective population size from allele frequency changes. , 1983, Genetics.

[19]  O. H. Frankel,et al.  Conservation and Evolution , 1983 .

[20]  M. Nei,et al.  Genetic drift and estimation of effective population size. , 1981, Genetics.

[21]  C. Krimbas,et al.  THE GENETICS OF DACUS OLEAE. V. CHANGES OF ESTERASE POLYMORPHISM IN A NATURAL POPULATION FOLLOWING INSECTICIDE CONTROL—SELECTION OR DRIFT? , 1971, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  M. Bruford,et al.  Microsatellites and their application to conservation genetics , 1996 .

[23]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Conservation Genetics , 2019, Handbook of Statistical Genomics.