An initiative to facilitate well-informed decision-making in laboratory animal research: report of the First International Symposium on Systematic Reviews in Laboratory Animal Science
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Rovers | M. Ritskes-Hoitinga | M. Leenaars | R. D. de Vries | C R Hooijmans | M Rovers | R B de Vries | M Leenaars | M Ritskes-Hoitinga | C. Hooijmans
[1] I. Olkin,et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. , 1996, JAMA.
[2] A. Walker,et al. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials. , 2004, Journal of wound care.
[3] I. Cuthill,et al. Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals , 2009, PloS one.
[4] I. Olkin,et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.
[5] M. Ritskes-Hoitinga,et al. A Gold Standard Publication Checklist to Improve the Quality of Animal Studies, to Fully Integrate the Three Rs, and to Make Systematic Reviews More Feasible , 2010, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.
[6] D. Howells,et al. Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy , 2010, PLoS biology.
[7] D. Howells,et al. Can Animal Models of Disease Reliably Inform Human Studies? , 2010, PLoS medicine.