Feature-based attention: it is all bottom-up priming

Feature-based attention (FBA) enhances the representation of image characteristics throughout the visual field, a mechanism that is particularly useful when searching for a specific stimulus feature. Even though most theories of visual search implicitly or explicitly assume that FBA is under top-down control, we argue that the role of top-down processing in FBA may be limited. Our review of the literature indicates that all behavioural and neuro-imaging studies investigating FBA suffer from the shortcoming that they cannot rule out an effect of priming. The mere attending to a feature enhances the mandatory processing of that feature across the visual field, an effect that is likely to occur in an automatic, bottom-up way. Studies that have investigated the feasibility of FBA by means of cueing paradigms suggest that the role of top-down processing in FBA is limited (e.g. prepare for red). Instead, the actual processing of the stimulus is needed to cause the mandatory tuning of responses throughout the visual field. We conclude that it is likely that all FBA effects reported previously are the result of bottom-up priming.

[1]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[3]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming , 2006 .

[4]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Y Tsal,et al.  Attending to color and shape: The special role of location in selective visual processing , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Naomi M. Kenner,et al.  How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search , 2004, Vision Research.

[7]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: Additivity is no evidence for filtering , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[8]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  The role of position in object selection in vision , 1993 .

[9]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The limits of top-down control of visual attention. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[10]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  Attentional guidance in singleton search: An examination of top-down, bottom-up, and intertrial factors , 2008 .

[12]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Visual Attention , 2020, Computational Models for Cognitive Vision.

[13]  S. Luck,et al.  Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J Theeuwes,et al.  Effects of location and form cuing on the allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[16]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  H J Müller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  T Kumada,et al.  Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[20]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: II. Role of position , 1996 .

[21]  H. Egeth,et al.  How does feature-based attention affect visual processing? , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[23]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search , 2006 .

[24]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Direct selection by color for visual encoding , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Attending to an object’s color entails Attending to its location: Support for location-special views of visual attention , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[27]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  The role of priming in conjunctive visual search , 2002, Cognition.

[28]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  On the limits of top-down control of visual selection , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[29]  A. V. D. Heijden,et al.  Identity and position: Dependence originates from independence , 1997 .

[30]  K. Cave,et al.  Spatial Attention in Visual Search for Features and Feature Conjunctions , 1995 .

[31]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  The role of search difficulty in intertrial feature priming , 2011, Vision Research.

[32]  J. V. von Wright,et al.  Selection in Visual Immediate Memory , 1968, Acta psychologica.

[33]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[34]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The role of cueing in attentional capture , 2008 .

[35]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The time it takes to turn a memory into a template. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[36]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[37]  E. Van der Burg,et al.  The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Arni Kristjánsson,et al.  The boundary conditions of priming of visual search: From passive viewing through task-relevant working memory load , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  Irene Reppa,et al.  Successes and failures in producing attentional object-based cueing effects , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[40]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[41]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[43]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  M. Paradiso,et al.  Feature-specific effects of selective visual attention , 1995, Vision Research.

[46]  G. Humphreys Flexibility of attention between stimulus dimensions , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global feature-based attention for motion and color , 2003, Vision Research.

[48]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[50]  R. Leal-Arcas,et al.  Contents: summary of , 2016 .

[51]  A. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  The role of position in object selection in vision. , 1993, Psychological research.

[52]  G. Sperling,et al.  Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  H. Müller,et al.  Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[57]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Response modulation by texture surround in primate area V1: Correlates of “popout” under anesthesia , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[58]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  What is top-down about contingent capture? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[59]  Joseph S. Lappin,et al.  Does prior knowledge facilitate the detection of visual targets in random noise? , 1976 .

[60]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[61]  H. Pashler,et al.  Visual selection mediated by location: Selecting successive visual objects , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[63]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[65]  C Bundesen,et al.  Measuring efficiency of selection from briefly exposed visual displays: a model for partial report. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[66]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[67]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[69]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[70]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[71]  R. Snowden,et al.  Can one pay attention to a particular color? , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[72]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[74]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[75]  J. Theeuwes Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[77]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[78]  J. Hoffman Hierarchical stages in the processing of visual information , 1975 .