Radio induced cancer risk during ERCP. Is it a real clinical problem?

BACKGROUND in recent years many factors have been shown to influence dose received by the patient during ERCP. Therefore it is necessary to update radio induced cancer risk. OBJECTIVES to calculate lifetime attributable risk of cancer during ERCP. To compare the risk with the most common X-ray examinations. DESIGN descriptive study with 393 consecutive ERCP performed at one center. Equipment used was Philips BV pulsera. In each exploration demographic and anthropometric variables of the patient were collected. Dosimetric quantities were calculated from exposure parameters. Effective dose was estimated using specific conversion factors. Organ doses and radio induced cancer incidence was estimated. RESULTS dose area product was 0.82 mGym2(IQR 0.4-1.5) with an average fluoroscopy time of 2 minutes and 45 seconds. Entrance surface dose was 30.7 mGy (IQR 15-60.8) and effective dose was 0.44 mSv (IQR 0.2-0.9). Multivariate analysis identified that difficult papillary cannulation (β 0.4; p = 0.009), patient age (β-0.01; p = 0.001) and therapeutic applied (β= 0.89; p < 0.001) influenced dose-area product. The ERCP dose would be equivalent to the radiation received by twenty chest radiographs and would be about fourteen times smaller than a barium enema or twenty times less than that received during an abdominal CT. Life-time attributable risk of cancer incidence was 4.08 and 16.81 per million procedures in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP respectively. CONCLUSIONS from the radiological point of view, ERCP is a safe technique that uses low exposure levels compared to other explorations commonly used in medicine. It implies a reasonably low risk of radio induced cancer.

[1]  H. Maldonado-Garza,et al.  Radiation doses to ERCP patients are significantly lower with experienced endoscopists. , 2011, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[2]  M. Byrne,et al.  Prospective analysis of fluoroscopy duration during ERCP: critical determinants. , 2010, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[3]  T. Olgar,et al.  Patient and staff doses for some complex x-ray examinations , 2009, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[4]  I. Okan,et al.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy without radiation. , 2009, World journal of gastroenterology.

[5]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Therapeutic ERCP and pregnancy: is the radiation risk for the conceptus trivial? , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  J. García-Cano,et al.  CPRE sin utilización de fluoroscopia en una paciente gestante con coledocolitiasis , 2008 .

[7]  E. Goldberg,et al.  Time-limited fluoroscopy to reduce radiation exposure during ERCP: a prospective randomized trial. , 2006, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[8]  Division on Earth Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[9]  M. Kahaleh,et al.  Safety and efficacy of ERCP in pregnancy. , 2004, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[10]  M. Dominietto,et al.  Patient radiation doses and references levels in interventional radiology. , 2004, La Radiologia medica.

[11]  T. Tham,et al.  Radiation doses to patients during ERCP. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  B. Wall,et al.  Organ Doses from Medical X-Ray Examinations Calculated Using Monte Carlo Techniques , 1985 .

[13]  G. Cohen,et al.  Absorbed doses to patients and personnel from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic (ERCP) examinations. , 1979, Radiology.

[14]  G. Barendsen Fundamental aspects of the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiation Protection , 1973 .