HydroLOGIC: An irrigation management system for Australian cotton

The worldwide need to improve water use efficiency within irrigated agriculture has been recognised in response to environmental concerns and conflicts in resource use. Within the Australian cotton industry, the imperative to reduce water use and optimise irrigation management through the understanding of risk, using information generated by computerised decision aids was identified and subsequently developed into the HydroLOGIC irrigation management software. This paper summarises the attributes of the HydroLOGIC irrigation management software, with particular emphasis on functionality and its application to irrigation decisions within the Australian cotton industry. The software development process is documented to provide direction for future software application initiatives, with particular emphasis on a process of user feedback, evaluation and support requirements providing direction to software development. On-farm experiments throughout the development period allowed the validation of internal software logic, irrigator decision processes, and the OZCOT cotton growth model. The software demonstrated the ability to improve yield and water use efficiency by optimising strategic and tactical irrigation decisions in the Australian furrow irrigation cotton production system. In 7 of the 11 on-farm experiments conducted, the use of HydroLOGIC helped improve overall field water use efficiency by optimising the timing of irrigation events or by indicating further irrigations would not provide yield or maturity benefits. The paper also presents useful insights into the development of software targeted for irrigation utilising in-field measurements of soil water, crop growth and a crop growth simulation model.

[1]  G. A. Constable,et al.  Mapping the production and survival of fruit on field-grown cotton , 1991 .

[2]  M. Grismer Regional cotton lint yield, ETc and water value in Arizona and California , 2002 .

[3]  James A. Larson,et al.  Adapting a cotton model for decision analyses: a yield-response evaluation , 1996 .

[4]  Michael Bange,et al.  A handheld decision support system to facilitate improved insect pest management in Australian cotton systems , 2004 .

[5]  M. Monsi Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung fur die Stoffproduktion , 1953 .

[6]  G. F. Arkin,et al.  The Cotton Simulation Model "COTTAM":Fruiting Model Calibration and Testing , 1988 .

[7]  P. Carberry,et al.  Row configuration as a tool for managing rain-fed cotton systems: review and simulation analysis , 2005 .

[8]  D. R. Upchurch,et al.  Cotton Irrigation Management with LEPA Systems , 1992 .

[9]  D. W. Grimes,et al.  CALEX/COTTON : AN INTEGRATED EXPERT SYSTEM APPLICATION FOR IRRIGATION SCHEDULING , 1992 .

[10]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover , 1972 .

[11]  Nlwra AUSTRALIA'S NATURAL RESOURCES : 1997 - 2002 AND BEYOND , 2002 .

[12]  Sandra Postel,et al.  Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last? , 1999 .

[13]  M. P. Bange,et al.  Row configuration in rainfed cotton systems: modification of the OZCOT simulation model , 2004 .

[14]  Steven R. Raine,et al.  Irrigation application efficiency and deep drainage potential under surface irrigated cotton , 2005 .

[15]  Knowledge Management in Cotton and Grain Irrigation , 2004 .

[16]  Michael P. Bange,et al.  SIRATAC and CottonLOGIC: persevering with DSSs in the Australian cotton industry , 2002 .

[17]  Peter Smith,et al.  Understanding irrigation decisions: from enterprise planning to the paddock , 2006 .

[18]  Nicholas D. Stone,et al.  A dynamically linked expert-database system for decision support in Texas cotton production , 1989 .

[19]  A. B. Hearn,et al.  A simple model for crop management applications for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) , 1985 .

[20]  M. Robertson,et al.  The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers', advisers', researchers' monitoring, simulation, communication and performance evaluation , 2002 .

[21]  G. Stanhill,et al.  Is the Class A evaporation pan still the most practical and accurate meteorological method for determining irrigation water requirements , 2002 .

[22]  F. D. Whisler,et al.  Application of the GOSSYM/COMAX system to cotton crop management , 1989 .

[23]  P. Pinter,et al.  Estimating cotton evapotranspiration crop coefficients with a multispectral vegetation index , 2003, Irrigation Science.

[24]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[25]  John O. Carter,et al.  Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  S. Milroy,et al.  Crop water use and water use efficiency on irrigated cotton farms in Australia , 2003 .

[27]  Upendra Singh,et al.  Climatic risk in crop production: Models and management for the semi-arid tropics and subtropics: Edited by Russell C. Muchow and Jennifer A. Bellamy. CAB International, Wallingford, 1991. 548 pp. Price: [pound sign]49[middle dot]50. ISBN 0 85198 665 X , 1993 .

[28]  N. Arumugam,et al.  Expert system applications in irrigation management: an overview , 1997 .

[29]  A. B. Hearn,et al.  OZCOT: A simulation model for cotton crop management , 1994 .

[30]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  APSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing and simulation in agricultural systems research , 1996 .