Conceptual Models as Hypotheses in Monitoring Urban Landscapes

Many problems and challenges of ecosystem management currently are driven by the rapid pace and spatial extent of landscape change. Parks and reserves within areas of high human population density are especially challenged to meet the recreational needs of local populations and to preserve valued environmental resources. The complex problem of managing multiple objectives and multiple resources requires an enormous quantity of information, and conceptual models have been proposed as tools for organizing and interpreting this information. Academics generally prefer a bottom-up approach to model construction that emphasizes ecologic theory and process, whereas managers often use a top-down approach that takes advantage of existing information to address more pragmatic objectives. The authors propose a formal process for developing, applying, and testing conceptual models to be used in landscape monitoring that reconciles these seemingly opposing perspectives. The four-step process embraces the role of hypothesis testing in the development of models and evaluation of their utility. An example application of the process to a network of national parks in and around Washington, DC illustrates the ability of the approach to systematically identify monitoring data that would both advance ecologic theory and inform management decisions.

[1]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  Designing Small Parks: A Manual for Addressing Social and Ecological Concerns , 2005 .

[2]  LELAND J. JACKSON,et al.  An Introduction to the Practice of Ecological Modeling , 2000 .

[3]  S. Pickett,et al.  Probability of tree seedling establishment changes across a forest-old field edge gradient. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[4]  H. Jenny,et al.  Factors of Soil Formation , 1941 .

[5]  David M. Rizzo,et al.  Sudden oak death: endangering California and Oregon forest ecosystems , 2003 .

[6]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Nitrogen Pollution in the Northeastern United States: Sources, Effects, and Management Options , 2003 .

[7]  J. P. Collins,et al.  A New Urban Ecology , 2000, American Scientist.

[8]  D. Wilcove,et al.  Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes , 1981 .

[9]  James P. Collins,et al.  Global amphibian declines: sorting the hypotheses , 2003 .

[10]  T. Spies,et al.  Vegetation Responses to Edge Environments in Old-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  T. Oke The urban energy balance , 1988 .

[12]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Impacts of multiple stressors on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the role of species co‐tolerance , 2004 .

[13]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Conservation Where People Live and Work , 2002 .

[14]  J. W. Ranney,et al.  importance of edge in the structure and dynamics of forest islands , 1981 .

[15]  Ross A. Alford,et al.  Global Amphibian Declines: A Problem in Applied Ecology , 1999 .

[16]  Mark E. Miller The Structure and Functioning of Dryland Ecosystems—Conceptual Models to Inform Long-Term Ecological Monitoring , 2005 .

[17]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[18]  W. S. Fisher,et al.  Strategies for evaluating indicators based on guidelines from the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Research and Development , 2001 .

[19]  L. K. Harris,et al.  Urban Neighbors' Wildlife-Related Attitudes and Behaviors near Federally Protected Areas in Tucson, Arizona, USA , 1997 .

[20]  E. Marshall DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS OF PLANTS ASSOCIATED WITH ARABLE FIELD EDGES , 1989 .

[21]  T. Spies,et al.  An empirical model for predicting diurnal air-temperature gradients from edge into old-growth Douglas-fir forest , 1993 .

[22]  D. Strebel,et al.  Using Environmental Stressor Information to Predict the Ecological Status of Maryland Non-tidal Streams as Measured by Biological Indicators , 2003, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[23]  Glenn W. Suter,et al.  Developing Conceptual Models for Complex Ecological Risk Assessments , 1999 .

[24]  F. Lindsay,et al.  Dynamics of urban growth in the Washington DC metropolitan area, 1973-1996, from Landsat observations , 2000 .

[25]  James W. Haefner,et al.  Modeling Biological Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[26]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management , 2002 .

[27]  E. M. Bailey,et al.  Geographic sensitivity of fine particle mass to emissions of SO2 and NOx. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Joel C. Trexler,et al.  Monitoring ecosystems: interdisciplinary approaches for evaluating ecoregional initiatives , 2004 .

[29]  Ross K. Meentemeyer,et al.  Mapping the risk of establishment and spread of sudden oak death in California , 2004 .

[30]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas , 2001 .

[31]  R. Engelman,et al.  Human population in the biodiversity hotspots , 2000, Nature.

[32]  Andrea Woodward,et al.  The role of ecological theory in long-term ecological monitoring: Report on a workshop , 1998 .

[33]  Glenn W. Suter A Framework for Assessment of Ecological Risks from Multiple Activities , 1999 .

[34]  George S. Innis,et al.  New directions in the analysis of ecological systems , 1975 .

[35]  Jocelyn Kaiser Bringing Science to the National Parks , 2000, Science.

[36]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY, COLONIZATION, AND LOCAL EXTINCTION WHEN A SPECIES IS DETECTED IMPERFECTLY , 2003 .

[37]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Principles of Ecosystem Sustainability , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[38]  B. Czech,et al.  Economic Associations among Causes of Species Endangerment in the United States , 2000 .

[39]  B. W. Rust,et al.  Importance of validation in ecosystem analysis , 1975 .

[40]  M. V. D. Belt,et al.  Mediated Modeling: A System Dynamics Approach To Environmental Consensus Building , 2004 .

[41]  Robert H. Gardner,et al.  Model Validation and Testing: , 2021 .

[42]  J. Bourdages,et al.  Response Time of Wetland Biodiversity to Road Construction on Adjacent Lands , 2000 .

[43]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology , 2003 .

[44]  William K. Lauenroth,et al.  Models in Ecosystem Science , 2003, Models in Ecosystem Science.

[45]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management: Integrating landscape structure and scale into natural resource management , 2002 .

[46]  E. Jáuregui,et al.  Urban effects on convective precipitation in Mexico city , 1996 .

[47]  Göran I. Ågren,et al.  Modeling biological systems , 1997 .

[48]  Charles Francis,et al.  The State of the Nation's Ecosystems. , 2003 .

[49]  C. Scott Findlay,et al.  Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines , 2000, Nature.

[50]  M. Parlange THE CITY AS ECOSYSTEM , 1998 .

[51]  D. Wake,et al.  Declining amphibian populations: A global phenomenon? , 1990 .

[52]  D. Urban,et al.  FOREST EDGES AND TREE GROWTH RATES IN THE NORTH CAROLINA PIEDMONT , 2004 .