In silico screening of chemicals for bacterial mutagenicity using electrotopological E-state indices and MDL QSAR software.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Fisher. The Advanced Theory of Statistics , 1943, Nature.
[2] R. Saracci,et al. Describing the validity of carcinogen screening tests. , 1979, British Journal of Cancer.
[3] J. Schmee. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1986 .
[4] M. Cimino,et al. Considerations in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's testing approach for mutagenicity. , 1991, Mutation research.
[5] R. Tennant,et al. Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP. , 1991, Mutation research.
[6] Availability of the GENE-TOX database on the National Library of Medicine TOXNET System. , 1993, Mutation research.
[7] P. Wagner,et al. The new chemicals process at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): structure-activity relationships for hazard identification and risk assessment. , 1995, Toxicology letters.
[8] Lemont B. Kier,et al. Electrotopological State Indices for Atom Types: A Novel Combination of Electronic, Topological, and Valence State Information , 1995, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[9] Gerrit Schüürmann,et al. Quantitative structure-activity relationships in environmental sciences, VII , 1997 .
[10] J. Contrera,et al. A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MCASE QSAR-ES software. , 1998, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[11] L. Hall,et al. Molecular Structure Description: The Electrotopological State , 1999 .
[12] A. Balaban,et al. Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR , 2003 .
[13] Erik Johansson,et al. QSAR Model Validation , 2000 .
[14] L. H. Hall and L.B. Kier. Molecular Connectivity Chi Indices for Database Analysis and Structure-Property Modeling , 2000 .
[15] L B Kier,et al. Issues in representation of molecular structure the development of molecular connectivity. , 2001, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[16] Lemond B. Kier,et al. Database Organization and Similarity Searching with E-State Indices , 2001 .
[17] G. Cash,et al. Prediction of the genotoxicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines using electrotopological state indices. , 2001, Mutation research.
[18] L B Kier,et al. Database Organization and Searching with E-State Indices , 2001, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.
[19] A. Tropsha,et al. Beware of q2! , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[20] A. Tropsha,et al. Beware of q 2 , 2002 .
[21] W. Tong,et al. Quantitative structure‐activity relationship methods: Perspectives on drug discovery and toxicology , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.
[22] Alan G. E. Wilson,et al. Role of predictive metabolism and toxicity modeling in drug discovery--a summary of some recent advancements. , 2003, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[23] J. Jaworska,et al. Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.
[24] John C. Dearden,et al. In silico prediction of drug toxicity , 2003, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[25] Paola Gramatica,et al. Introduction General Considerations , 2022 .
[26] J. Contrera,et al. Predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using molecular structural similarity and E-state indices. , 2003, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[27] Lowell H Hall,et al. A Structure‐Information Approach to the Prediction of Biological Activities and Properties , 2004, Chemistry & biodiversity.
[28] Anja Vogler,et al. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2004 .
[29] R. Snyder,et al. Assessment of the sensitivity of the computational programs DEREK, TOPKAT, and MCASE in the prediction of the genotoxicity of pharmaceutical molecules , 2004, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.
[30] A. Worth,et al. The prospects for using (Q)SARs in a changing political environment--high expectations and a key role for the european commission's joint research centre , 2004, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.
[31] L. Hall,et al. Three new consensus QSAR models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity. , 2004, Mutagenesis.
[32] Joseph F Contrera,et al. QSAR modeling of carcinogenic risk using discriminant analysis and topological molecular descriptors. , 2005, Current drug discovery technologies.
[33] Elizabeth Wilson,et al. Is safe exchange of data possible , 2005 .
[34] Philip Howard,et al. Practical considerations on the use of predictive models for regulatory purposes. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.