Collaboration and Boundaries in Organized Crime: A Network Perspective

A network approach helps us better specify and model collaboration among people involved in organized crime. The focus on collaboration raises the boundary specification problem: Where do criminal organizations start, where do they end, and who is involved? Traditional approaches sometimes assume the existence of simple, rigid structures when complexity and fluidity are the norms. A network approach embraces this complexity conceptually and provides methodological guidelines for clarifying boundaries. Boundary specification in organized crime helps solve four puzzles. First, social boundaries: a network approach reduces confusion about social boundaries as criminal entrepreneurs interact with criminals and noncriminals in diverse contexts, only some of them illicit. Second, boundaries of group membership: network data and methods obviate the need for formal membership attributions. Third, ethnic boundaries network analyses reveal that the effective boundaries of criminal organizations are based on social relations, not attributes such as ethnicity. Fourth, recruitment: attending to the larger social environments in which organizations are embedded provides a clearer view of how mechanisms of recruitment cross seemingly rigid boundaries between members and prospective members.

[1]  Patrick Riordan Blueprint: The Evolutionary Origins of a Good Society. By Nicholas A.Christakis. Pp. xxi, 520, NY, Boston, London, Little, Brown Spark, 2019, $30.00. , 2019 .

[2]  Damián Zaitch,et al.  The social embeddedness of organized crime , 2014 .

[3]  D. Haynie Delinquent Peers Revisited: Does Network Structure Matter?1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Karen Page,et al.  Network Forms of Organization , 1998 .

[5]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  Career opportunities and network-based privileges in the Cosa Nostra , 2003 .

[6]  C. Forsyth,et al.  The Tools, Tactics, and Mentality of Outlaw Biker Wars , 2011 .

[7]  Gisela Bichler,et al.  Disrupting Criminal Networks : Network Analysis in Crime Prevention , 2015 .

[8]  Letizia Paoli,et al.  The paradoxes of organized crime , 2002 .

[9]  Malcolm K. Sparrow,et al.  The application of network analysis to criminal intelligence: An assessment of the prospects , 1991 .

[10]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[11]  M. Bouchard,et al.  The Search for Suitable Homicide Co-Offenders Among Gang Members , 2015, CrimRxiv.

[12]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  Where “Old Heads” Prevail: Inmate Hierarchy in a Men’s Prison Unit , 2017, American sociological review.

[13]  Lorine A. Hughes,et al.  GROUP COHESIVENESS, GANG MEMBER PRESTIGE, AND DELINQUENCY AND VIOLENCE IN CHICAGO, 1959–1962 , 2013 .

[14]  Martin Bouchard,et al.  One gang dies, another gains? The network dynamics of criminal group persistence , 2018, Criminology.

[15]  Edward R. Kleemans,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives on Organized Crime , 2014 .

[16]  Daniel DellaPosta,et al.  Network closure and integration in the mid-20th century American mafia , 2017, Soc. Networks.

[17]  Gisela Bichler,et al.  Co-offending between criminal enterprise groups , 2011 .

[18]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Uncertainty, Cooperation, and Crime: Understanding the Decision to Co-offend , 1998 .

[19]  Eleonora Patacchini,et al.  Organized Crime Networks: an Application of Network Analysis Techniques to the American Mafia , 2012 .

[20]  C. Whelan,et al.  Social network analysis and small group ‘dark’ networks: an analysis of the London bombers and the problem of ‘fuzzy’ boundaries , 2015 .

[21]  M. Bouchard,et al.  Assessing the Core Membership of a Youth Gang from its Co-offending Network , 2013 .

[22]  Martin Bouchard,et al.  Criminal collaboration and risk: The drivers of Al Qaeda's network structure before and after 9/11 , 2017, Soc. Networks.

[23]  Sheldon X. Zhang,et al.  WOMEN'S PARTICIPATION IN CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL HUMAN SMUGGLING: A GENDERED MARKET PERSPECTIVE* , 2007 .

[24]  K. McConnell The Construction of the Gang in British Columbia: Mafioso, Gangster, or Thug? An Examination of the Uniqueness of the BC Gangster Phenomenon , 2015 .

[25]  Valdis E. Krebs,et al.  Mapping Networks of Terrorist Cells , 2001 .

[26]  Peter Reuter Disorganized crime : the economics of the visible hand , 1983 .

[27]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  Group co-offending networks in Italy’s illegal drug trade , 2014 .

[29]  J. Sarnecki Delinquent Networks: Youth Co-Offending in Stockholm , 2001 .

[30]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[31]  Paolo Campana,et al.  Out of Africa: The organization of migrant smuggling across the Mediterranean , 2018 .

[32]  Francesco Calderoni,et al.  The structure of drug trafficking mafias: the ‘Ndrangheta and cocaine , 2012 .

[33]  Federico Varese,et al.  Listening to the wire: criteria and techniques for the quantitative analysis of phone intercepts , 2011, Trends in Organized Crime.

[34]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  CRIMINAL ACHIEVEMENT, OFFENDER NETWORKS AND THE BENEFITS OF LOW SELF‐CONTROL , 2004 .

[35]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  The independent's edge in an illegal drug distribution setting: Levitt and Venkatesh revisited , 2017, Soc. Networks.

[36]  Martin Bouchard,et al.  On to the next one? Using social network data to inform police target prioritization , 2017, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management.

[37]  Marie Ouellet,et al.  Criminal Group Dynamics and Network Methods , 2019, Methods of Criminology and Criminal Justice Research.

[38]  A. Papachristos Murder by Structure: Dominance Relations and the Social Structure of Gang Homicide in Chicago , 2007, AJS; American journal of sociology.

[39]  M. Bouchard,et al.  Opportunistic Structures of Organized Crime , 2014 .

[40]  P. Tremblay,et al.  The size and influence of a criminal organization: a criminal achievement perspective , 2009 .

[41]  Aili Malm,et al.  Social Network Analysis and Its Contribution to Research on Crime and Criminal Justice , 2016 .

[42]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  “Legitimate Strengths in Criminal Networks” , 2006 .

[43]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  J. Raab,et al.  Powell (1990): Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization , 2018, Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung.

[45]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[46]  Carlo Piccardi,et al.  Communities in criminal networks: A case study , 2017, Soc. Networks.

[47]  D. Siegel,et al.  Organized crime and ethnic reputation manipulation , 2003 .

[48]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Models of core/periphery structures , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[49]  Gisela Bichler,et al.  Networks of Collaborating Criminals: Assessing the Structural Vulnerability of Drug Markets , 2011 .

[50]  Gisela Bichler,et al.  The Impact of Civil Gang Injunctions on Networked Violence Between the Bloods and the Crips , 2019 .

[51]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  PATTERNS IN CRIMINAL ACHIEVEMENT: WILSON AND ABRAHAMSE REVISITED , 2000 .

[52]  A. Blokland,et al.  Not your average biker; criminal careers of members of Dutch outlaw motorcycle gangs , 2019 .

[53]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  Alliances, Conflicts, and Contradictions in Montreal’s Street Gang Landscape , 2011 .

[54]  Frédéric Ouellet,et al.  Is small beautiful? The link between risks and size in illegal drug markets , 2011 .

[55]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[56]  Steven L. Del Sesto,et al.  A family business : kinship and social control in organized crime , 1974 .

[57]  Klaus von Lampe,et al.  The crime that pays: drug trafficking and organized crime in Canada , 2007 .

[58]  Elizabeth R. Groff,et al.  The Criminology of Place: Street Segments and Our Understanding of the Crime Problem , 2012 .

[59]  P. Tremblay Searching for Suitable Co-offenders , 2017 .

[60]  Edward R. Kleemans,et al.  Criminal Careers in Organized Crime and Social Opportunity Structure , 2008 .

[61]  K. Lampe Human capital and social capital in criminal networks: introduction to the special issue on the 7th Blankensee Colloquium , 2009 .

[62]  Federico Varese The Structure and the Content of Criminal Connections: The Russian Mafia in Italy , 2013 .

[63]  B. McCarthy,et al.  MENTORS AND CRIMINAL ACHIEVEMENT , 2006 .

[64]  Frank M. Weerman,et al.  DELINQUENT PEERS IN CONTEXT: A LONGITUDINAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF SELECTION AND INFLUENCE EFFECTS* , 2011 .

[65]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Capital: Theory and Research , 2017 .

[66]  David A. Bright,et al.  Illicit Network Dynamics: The Formation and Evolution of a Drug Trafficking Network , 2019 .

[67]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  The Corner and the Crew: The Influence of Geography and Social Networks on Gang Violence , 2013 .

[68]  M. Haller ILLEGAL ENTERPRISE: A THEORETICAL AND HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION * , 1990 .

[69]  R. Karl Rethemeyer,et al.  Network analysis , 2011 .

[70]  Peter J. Carrington,et al.  Crime and Social Network Analysis , 2014 .

[71]  W. Bernasco,et al.  Criminal groups and transnational illegal markets , 2004 .

[72]  A. Blokland,et al.  Outlaw Motorcycle Clubs and Organized Crime , 2020, Crime and Justice.

[73]  Carlo Morselli,et al.  The Efficiency/Security Trade-Off in Criminal Networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[74]  A. Papachristos,et al.  The Embedded and Multiplex Nature of Al Capone , 2013 .

[75]  Martin Bouchard,et al.  Professionals or Amateurs? Revisiting the Notion of Professional Crime in the Context of Cannabis Cultivation , 2016 .

[76]  A. Sergi A qualitative reading of the ecological (dis)organisation of criminal associations. The case of the ‘Famiglia Basilischi’ in Italy , 2016 .

[77]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 2014 .

[78]  Jacob T. N. Young How Do They ‘End Up Together’? A Social Network Analysis of Self-Control, Homophily, and Adolescent Relationships , 2011 .

[79]  Hernan Mondani,et al.  The Complexity of Crime Network Data: A Case Study of Its Consequences for Crime Control and the Study of Networks , 2015, PloS one.

[80]  G. Simmel,et al.  Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations , 1955 .

[81]  L. Verbrugge Multiplexity in Adult Friendships , 1979 .

[82]  M. Bouchard,et al.  The 40 Members of the Toronto 18: Group Boundaries and the Analysis of Illicit Networks , 2018, Deviant Behavior.

[83]  B. Erickson Secret Societies and Social Structure , 1981 .