A Comparison Between Global and Context-Adaptive Pansharpening of Multispectral Images

Multiresolution analysis (MRA) and component substitution (CS) are the two basic frameworks to which image fusion algorithms can be reported when merging multispectral (MS) and panchromatic (Pan) images (pansharpening), acquired with different spatial and spectral resolutions. State-of-the-art algorithms add the spatial details extracted from the Pan into the MS data set by considering different injection strategies. The capability of efficiently modeling the relationships between MS and Pan is crucial for the quality of fusion results and particularly for a correct recovery of local features with a consequent reduction of spectral distortions. Although context-adaptive (CA) injection models have been proposed in the MRA framework, their adoption in CS schemes has been scarcely investigated so far. In this letter, CA strategies are compared with global models by considering a general protocol in which both MRA- and CS-based schemes can be described. Qualitative and quantitative results are reported for three high-resolution data sets from two different sensors, namely, IKONOS and simulated Pleiades. The score gains of well-known and novel quality figures show that CA models are more efficient than global ones.

[1]  Fabrizio Argenti,et al.  Wavelet and pyramid techniques for multisensor data fusion: a performance comparison varying with scale ratios , 1999, Remote Sensing.

[2]  Luciano Alparone,et al.  MTF-tailored Multiscale Fusion of High-resolution MS and Pan Imagery , 2006 .

[3]  S. Baronti,et al.  Multispectral and panchromatic data fusion assessment without reference , 2008 .

[4]  Roger Sauter,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists , 2005, Technometrics.

[5]  Luciano Alparone,et al.  A global quality measurement of pan-sharpened multispectral imagery , 2004, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Bruno Aiazzi,et al.  Improving Component Substitution Pansharpening Through Multivariate Regression of MS $+$Pan Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Xavier Otazu,et al.  Multiresolution-based image fusion with additive wavelet decomposition , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[9]  Andrea Garzelli,et al.  Context-driven fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images based on oversampled multiresolution analysis , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  P. Chavez Digital merging of Landsat TM and digitized NHAP data for 1: 24,000-scale image mapping((National Hi , 1986 .

[11]  P. Vaidyanathan Multirate Systems And Filter Banks , 1992 .

[12]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Comparison of Pansharpening Algorithms: Outcome of the 2006 GRS-S Data-Fusion Contest , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  L. Wald,et al.  Fusion of satellite images of different spatial resolutions: Assessing the quality of resulting images , 1997 .

[14]  W. J. Carper,et al.  The use of intensity-hue-saturation transformations for merging SPOT panchromatic and multispectral image data , 1990 .

[15]  Qingquan Li,et al.  A comparative analysis of image fusion methods , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Te-Ming Tu,et al.  A new look at IHS-like image fusion methods , 2001, Inf. Fusion.

[17]  Te-Ming Tu,et al.  A fast intensity-hue-saturation fusion technique with spectral adjustment for IKONOS imagery , 2004, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[18]  L. Wald,et al.  Fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images : The ARSIS concept and its implementation , 2000 .

[19]  Rafael García,et al.  Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images using improved IHS and PCA mergers based on wavelet decomposition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.