Recognition Failure of Recallable Unique Names: Evidence For an Empirical Law of Memory and Learning

An experiment is described in which subjects (N = 106) studied unique names of famous individuals, such as ISAAC NEWTON and GEORGE WASHINGTON, and unique geographic names, such as TORONTO and STOCKHOLM, in the context of descriptive phrases. In a subsequent recognition test of the names in the absence of their study context, subjects failed to recognize many names that they could recall in the presence of the study context. These results (a) demonstrate the generality of the phenomenon of recognition failure of recallable words, (b) limit Muter's (1984) claim that unique names of famous people constitute an exception to the Tulving-Wiseman (1975) function, and (c) provide further support for an empirical law concerning the relation between recognition and recall.

[1]  P. Muter Recognition failure of recallable words in semantic memory , 1978 .

[2]  A. J. Flexser,et al.  Priming and recognition failure , 1982 .

[3]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Exceptions to recognition failure of recallable words , 1980 .

[4]  W P Wallace,et al.  Recognition failure of recallable words and recognizable words. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[5]  G. V. Jones,et al.  Structure of the recall process , 1983 .

[6]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[7]  L. Stern,et al.  The structures and strategies of human memory , 1985 .

[8]  John Brown,et al.  Recall and Recognition , 1976 .

[9]  A. J. Flexser,et al.  Retrieval independence in recognition and recall. , 1978 .

[10]  L. Postman Tests of the generality of the principle of encoding specificity , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[11]  P. Muter Recognition and recall of words with a single meaning , 1984 .

[12]  L. Nilsson,et al.  A Functional View of Memory , 1980 .

[13]  B. Murdock Human memory: Theory and data. , 1975 .

[14]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[15]  Endel Tulving,et al.  A Test of Confusion Theory of Encoding Specificity. , 1975 .

[16]  E. Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity: Relation between recall superiority and recognition failure. , 1976 .

[17]  Michael S. Humphreys,et al.  Effect of a recognition test on a subsequent cued-recall test. , 1979 .

[18]  J. C. Rabinowitz Aging and recognition failure. , 1984, Journal of gerontology.

[19]  D. G. Payne,et al.  A direct comparison of recognition failure rates for recallable names in episodic and semanticmemory tests , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[20]  P. D. Mccormack,et al.  Recognition memory: How complex a retrieval system? , 1972 .

[21]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  Perspectives on memory research : essays in honor of Uppsala University's 500th anniversary , 1979 .

[22]  E. Tulving Elements of episodic memory , 1983 .

[23]  C. Thompson,et al.  Encoding specificity: retrieval asymmetry in the recognition failure paradigm. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[24]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Processing in Human Memory , 1979 .

[25]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Recognition Failure: Another Case of Retrieval Failure. , 1977 .

[26]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[27]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Sequential testing effects and the relationship between recognition and recognition failure , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[28]  I. Begg Trace loss and the recognition failure of unrecalled words , 1979 .

[29]  J. Anderson,et al.  Memory for information about individuals , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[30]  C. Mills,et al.  Human learning and memory. , 1984, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Episodic memory: When recognition fails. , 1975 .

[32]  Edwin Martin,et al.  Generation-recognition theory and the encoding specificity principle. , 1975 .

[33]  A. J. Flexser Homogenizing the 2 × 2 contingency table: A method for removing dependencies due to subject and item differences. , 1981 .

[34]  Gregory V. Jones Analyzing recognition and recall , 1984, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  A semantic interpretation of encoding specificity , 1974 .

[36]  Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al.  A reconstructive-processing interpretation of the recognition failure phenomenon ☆ , 1981 .

[37]  Ruth E. Donnelly Priming effects in successive episodic tests. , 1988 .

[38]  E. Tulving,et al.  Recognition failure of categorized words , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[39]  John R. Anderson,et al.  RECOGNITION AND RETRIEVAL PROCESSES IN FREE RECALL , 1972 .

[40]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[41]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words , 1975 .

[42]  E Tulving,et al.  Recognition failure of words with a single meaning , 1977, Memory & cognition.