Assessment of T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis and C2-7 Sagittal Vertical Axis Criteria of a Cervical Spine Deformity Classification System Using Long-Term Follow-up Data After Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery.

BACKGOUND Recently, previous research proposed a cervical spine deformity (CSD) classification using a modified Delphi approach. However, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and T1 slope minus C2-C7 lordosis (TS-CL) cut-off values for moderate and severe disability were based on expert opinion. OBJECTIVE To investigate the validity of a CSD classification system. METHODS From 2007 to 2012, 30 consecutive patients with a minimum 5-yr follow-up having 3- or more level posterior cervical fusion met inclusion criteria. The following radiographic parameters were measured: C0-C2 lordosis, C2-C7 lordosis, C2-C7 SVA, T1 slope, and TS-CL. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between pairs of radiographic measures and health-related quality of life. RESULTS Average follow-up period was 7.3 yr. C2-C7 SVA positively correlated with neck disability index (NDI) scores (r = 0.554). Regression models predicted a threshold C2-C7 SVA value of 40.8 mm and 70.6 mm correlated with moderate and severe disability based on the NDI score, respectively. The TS-CL had positive correlation with C2-C7 SVA and NDI scores (r = 0.841 and r = 0.625, respectively). Regression analyses revealed that a C2-C7 SVA value of 40 mm and 70 mm corresponded to a TS-CL value of 20° and 25°, respectively. CONCLUSION Regression models predicted a threshold C2-C7 SVA (value of 40.8 mm and 70.6 mm) and TS-CL (value of 20° and 25°) correlated with moderate and severe disability based on the NDI, respectively. The cut-off value C2-C7 SVA and TS-CL modifier of the CSD classification can be revised accordingly.

[1]  L. Lenke,et al.  Recent and Emerging Advances in Spinal Deformity , 2017, Neurosurgery.

[2]  T. Jahng,et al.  Relationship Between T1 Slope and Cervical Alignment Following Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery: Impact of T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis , 2016, Spine.

[3]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[4]  Sang-Hun Lee,et al.  Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[5]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  The Impact of Standing Regional Cervical Sagittal Alignment on Outcomes in Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[6]  Yongjung Kim,et al.  Spinal pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients. , 2013, World journal of clinical cases.

[7]  V. Deviren,et al.  Spontaneous improvement of cervical alignment after correction of global sagittal balance following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[8]  C. Shaffrey,et al.  Dynamic Changes of the Pelvis and Spine Are Key to Predicting Postoperative Sagittal Alignment After Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: A Critical Analysis of Preoperative Planning Techniques , 2012, Spine.

[9]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Changes in Thoracic Kyphosis Negatively Impact Sagittal Alignment After Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: A Comprehensive Radiographic Analysis , 2012, Spine.

[10]  L. Lenke,et al.  Results of Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Fixed Sagittal Imbalance: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Study , 2007, Spine.

[11]  J. W. Hardacker,et al.  Radiographic Standing Cervical Segmental Alignment in Adult Volunteers Without Neck Symptoms , 1997, Spine.

[12]  S. Mior,et al.  The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. , 1991, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.