Vary Slow Motion: Effect of Task Forces on Movement Variability and Implications for a Novel Skill Augmentation Mechanism

This article presents the results of a human subject experiment aimed at answering the question, "can increased muscle force variability in low force levels explain increased variability or intermittency of slow movements?" To address this research question, we conducted an experiment with eight subjects, which involved the completion of slow elbow flexion movements at two target speed levels and under five resistive torque fields implemented via an elbow exoskeleton. The results of this experiment demonstrated that increasing levels of resistive torques decreased movement speed variability only until a certain torque level. This observation indicates that a motor-unit pool-based muscle force generation variability, which is known to increase at low force levels, can indeed underlie increased variability in slow movements. Our results imply that resistive torques may be used to significantly decrease movement speed variability, opening up new possibilities for novel assistive devices for motor skill augmentation.

[1]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Progressive shared control for training in virtual environments , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[2]  Will G. Hopkins,et al.  A new view of statistics , 2002 .

[3]  T. Milner,et al.  The effect of accuracy constraints on three-dimensional movement kinematics , 1990, Neuroscience.

[4]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery , 2004 .

[6]  S. Pasalar,et al.  Effects of speeds and force fields on submovements during circular manual tracking in humans , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  The scaling of motor noise with muscle strength and motor unit number in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Katherine J. Kuchenbecker,et al.  VerroTouch: High-Frequency Acceleration Feedback for Telerobotic Surgery , 2010, EuroHaptics.

[9]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Negative efficacy of fixed gain error reducing shared control for training in virtual environments , 2009, TAP.

[11]  N. Hogan,et al.  Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  W. Rymer,et al.  Effect of robot-assisted and unassisted exercise on functional reaching in chronic hemiparesis , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  P. Viviani,et al.  The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[14]  K. E. Novak,et al.  Kinematic properties of rapid hand movements in a knob turning task , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Joseph A. Doeringer,et al.  Intermittency in preplanned elbow movements persists in the absence of visual feedback. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Corwin Boake,et al.  Normalized Movement Quality Measures for Therapeutic Robots Strongly Correlate With Clinical Motor Impairment Measures , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  João M. Ferreira Calado,et al.  Approaches to human arm movement control - A review , 2009, Annu. Rev. Control..

[19]  L. Selen,et al.  Impedance Control Reduces Instability That Arises from Motor Noise , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Lucy Y. Pao,et al.  Friction modeling and compensation for haptic interfaces , 2005, First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference.

[21]  Zhigang Deng,et al.  Intermittency of slow arm movements increases in distal direction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[22]  Joseph A. Doeringer,et al.  An investigation into the discrete nature of human arm movements , 1999 .

[23]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational motor control , 2004 .

[26]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Progressive haptic and visual guidance for training in a virtual dynamic task , 2010, 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium.

[27]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Impedance modulation and feedback corrections in tracking targets of variable size and frequency. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  K. Newell,et al.  Movement time and velocity as determinants of movement timing accuracy. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.

[31]  M. Kawato,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .