A dual-Kinect approach to determine torso surface motion for respiratory motion correction in PET.

PURPOSE Respiratory gating is commonly used to reduce blurring effects and attenuation correction artifacts in positron emission tomography (PET). Established clinically available methods that employ body-attached hardware for acquiring respiration signals rely on the assumption that external surface motion and internal organ motion are well correlated. In this paper, the authors present a markerless method comprising two Microsoft Kinects for determining the motion on the whole torso surface and aim to demonstrate its validity and usefulness-including the potential to study the external/internal correlation and to provide useful information for more advanced correction approaches. METHODS The data of two Kinects are used to calculate 3D representations of a patient's torso surface with high spatial coverage. Motion signals can be obtained for any position by tracking the mean distance to a virtual camera with a view perpendicular to the surrounding surface. The authors have conducted validation experiments including volunteers and a moving high-precision platform to verify the method's suitability for providing meaningful data. In addition, the authors employed it during clinical (18)F-FDG-PET scans and exemplarily analyzed the acquired data of ten cancer patients. External signals of abdominal and thoracic regions as well as data-driven signals were used for gating and compared with respect to detected displacement of present lesions. Additionally, the authors quantified signal similarities and time shifts by analyzing cross-correlation sequences. RESULTS The authors' results suggest a Kinect depth resolution of approximately 1 mm at 75 cm distance. Accordingly, valid signals could be obtained for surface movements with small amplitudes in the range of only few millimeters. In this small sample of ten patients, the abdominal signals were better suited for gating the PET data than the thoracic signals and the correlation of data-driven signals was found to be stronger with abdominal signals than with thoracic signals (average Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.74 ± 0.17 and 0.45 ± 0.23, respectively). In all cases, except one, the abdominal respiratory motion preceded the thoracic motion-a maximum delay of approximately 600 ms was detected. CONCLUSIONS The method provides motion information with sufficiently high spatial and temporal resolution. Thus, it enables meaningful analysis in the form of comparisons between amplitudes and phase shifts of signals from different regions. In combination with a large field-of-view, as given by combining the data of two Kinect cameras, it yields surface representations that might be useful in the context of motion correction and motion modeling.

[1]  O. Schober,et al.  Respiratory gating in positron emission tomography: a quantitative comparison of different gating schemes. , 2007, Medical physics.

[2]  C. Ling,et al.  Effect of respiratory gating on reducing lung motion artifacts in PET imaging of lung cancer. , 2002, Medical physics.

[3]  Y. Erdi,et al.  Respiratory artefact causing malpositioning of liver dome lesion in right lower lung. , 2003, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[4]  P. Börnert,et al.  Free-breathing cardiac MR imaging: study of implications of respiratory motion--initial results. , 2001, Radiology.

[5]  Junyi Xia,et al.  A real-time respiratory motion monitoring system using KINECT: proof of concept. , 2012, Medical physics.

[6]  P. Marsden,et al.  Retrospective data-driven respiratory gating for PET/CT , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  J. Mechalakos,et al.  Motion monitoring for cranial frameless stereotactic radiosurgery using video-based three-dimensional optical surface imaging. , 2011, Medical physics.

[8]  D. Townsend,et al.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  O. Schober,et al.  List Mode–Driven Cardiac and Respiratory Gating in PET , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  David Kim,et al.  Shake'n'sense: reducing interference for overlapping structured light depth cameras , 2012, CHI.

[11]  P. Elangovan,et al.  Assessment of Microsoft Kinect technology (Kinect for Xbox and Kinect for windows) for patient monitoring during external beam radiotherapy , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[12]  Kourosh Khoshelham,et al.  Accuracy analysis of kinect depth data , 2012 .

[13]  A. Pevsner,et al.  The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Respiratory motion in positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a review. , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[15]  George Starkschall,et al.  Evaluation of internal lung motion for respiratory-gated radiotherapy using MRI: Part I--correlating internal lung motion with skin fiducial motion. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Sander Oude Elberink,et al.  Accuracy and Resolution of Kinect Depth Data for Indoor Mapping Applications , 2012, Sensors.

[17]  Benjamin Movsas,et al.  A technique of quantitatively monitoring both respiratory and nonrespiratory motion in patients using external body markers. , 2007, Medical physics.

[18]  Martin J Murphy,et al.  Issues in respiratory motion compensation during external-beam radiotherapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Marcus A. Magnor,et al.  Markerless Motion Capture using multiple Color-Depth Sensors , 2011, VMV.

[20]  H. Kubo,et al.  Respiration gated radiotherapy treatment: a technical study. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Jon Howard,et al.  Accurate markerless respiratory tracking for gated whole body PET using the Microsoft Kinect , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[22]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Precise and real-time measurement of 3D tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat, measured during radiotherapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  G Baroni,et al.  Robustness of external/internal correlation models for real-time tumor tracking to breathing motion variations , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Florian Büther,et al.  Detection of respiratory tumour motion using intrinsic list mode-driven gating in positron emission tomography , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  Juho Kannala,et al.  Joint Depth and Color Camera Calibration with Distortion Correction , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[26]  Claudia Kuntner,et al.  A new fast and fully automated software based algorithm for extracting respiratory signal from raw PET data and its comparison to other methods. , 2010, Medical physics.

[27]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .

[28]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Time-of-flight sensor for respiratory motion gating. , 2008, Medical physics.

[29]  K. D. Mankoff,et al.  The Kinect: a low‐cost, high‐resolution, short‐range 3D camera , 2013 .