EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interaction: Improved Accuracy by Automatic Single-Trial Error Detection

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), as any other interaction modality based on physiological signals and body channels (e.g., muscular activity, speech and gestures), are prone to errors in the recognition of subject's intent. An elegant approach to improve the accuracy of BCIs consists in a verification procedure directly based on the presence of error-related potentials (ErrP) in the EEG recorded right after the occurrence of an error. Six healthy volunteer subjects with no prior BCI experience participated in a new human-robot interaction experiment where they were asked to mentally move a cursor towards a target that can be reached within a few steps using motor imagination. This experiment confirms the previously reported presence of a new kind of ErrP. These "Interaction ErrP" exhibit a first sharp negative peak followed by a positive peak and a second broader negative peak (~290, ~350 and ~470 ms after the feedback, respectively). But in order to exploit these ErrP we need to detect them in each single trial using a short window following the feedback associated to the response of the classifier embedded in the BCI. We have achieved an average recognition rate of correct and erroneous single trials of 81.8% and 76.2%, respectively. Furthermore, we have achieved an average recognition rate of the subject's intent while trying to mentally drive the cursor of 73.1%. These results show that it's possible to simultaneously extract useful information for mental control to operate a brain-actuated device as well as cognitive states such as error potentials to improve the quality of the brain-computer interaction. Finally, using a well-known inverse model (sLORETA), we show that the main focus of activity at the occurrence of the ErrP are, as expected, in the pre-supplementary motor area and in the anterior cingulate cortex.

[1]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Neural correlates of error detection and error correction: is there a common neuroanatomical substrate? , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[3]  P. Rossini,et al.  High-resolution electro-encephalogram: source estimates of Laplacian-transformed somatosensory-evoked potentials using a realistic subject head model constructed from magnetic resonance images , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[4]  J. Millán,et al.  Error-related EEG potentials in brain-computer interfaces , 2007 .

[5]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[6]  José del R. Millán,et al.  You Are Wrong! - Automatic Detection of Interaction Errors from Brain Waves , 2005, IJCAI.

[7]  P. Sajda,et al.  Response error correction-a demonstration of improved human-machine performance using real-time EEG monitoring , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Non-Invasive Brain-Actuated Control of a Mobile Robot , 2003, IJCAI.

[9]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Boosting bit rates and error detection for the classification of fast-paced motor commands based on single-trial EEG analysis , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[11]  D.J. McFarland,et al.  Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain-computer interface (BCI): feature selection by regression improves performance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[13]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based communication: presence of an error potential , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. , 2001, Psychophysiology.