Enablers, barriers, and future considerations for living lab effectiveness in environmental and agricultural sustainability transitions: a review of studies evaluating living labs

[1]  James M. White,et al.  Environmental expertise for social transformation: roles and responsibilities for social science , 2022, Environmental Sociology.

[2]  C. Huyghe,et al.  The Defining Characteristics of Agroecosystem Living Labs , 2021, Sustainability.

[3]  V. Nguyen,et al.  Moving toward Generalizability? A Scoping Review on Measuring the Impact of Living Labs , 2021, Sustainability.

[4]  R. Horne,et al.  Housing Industry Transitions: An Urban Living Lab in Melbourne, Australia , 2020 .

[5]  Laurence L. Delina.  A rural energy collaboratory: co-production in Thailand’s community energy experiments , 2019, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.

[6]  M. Westerlund,et al.  Living Labs: From Scattered Initiatives to a Global Movement , 2019, Creativity and Innovation Management.

[7]  T. Callari,et al.  Exploring Participation Needs and Motivational Requirements When Engaging Older Adults in an Emerging Living Lab , 2019, Technology Innovation Management Review.

[8]  Mauricio Camargo,et al.  Design and Management of Innovation Laboratories: Toward a Performance Assessment Tool , 2019, Creativity and Innovation Management.

[9]  Mika Westerlund,et al.  A Systematic Review of Living Lab Literature , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[10]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation , 2018, European Planning Studies.

[11]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  The effectiveness of involving users in digital innovation: Measuring the impact of living labs , 2018, Telematics Informatics.

[12]  Giorgia Nesti.  Co-production for innovation: the urban living lab experience* , 2018 .

[13]  Peter J. Richardson,et al.  Evaluating screening approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma in a cohort of HCV related cirrhosis patients from the Veteran’s Affairs Health Care System , 2018, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[14]  E. V. Bueren,et al.  The Defining Characteristics of Urban Living Labs , 2017 .

[15]  Vanesa Castán Broto,et al.  Just sustainabilities and local action: evidence from 400 flagship initiatives , 2017 .

[16]  K. McCormick,et al.  Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda , 2016 .

[17]  P. Ballon,et al.  The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes , 2016 .

[18]  D. Schuurman,et al.  Factors Affecting the Attrition of Test Users During Living Lab Field Trials , 2016 .

[19]  Ross Jones,et al.  Living labs and co-production : university campuses as platforms for sustainability science , 2015 .

[20]  Fabio Pianesi,et al.  Exploring long-term participation within a living lab: satisfaction, motivations and expectations , 2014, NordiCHI.

[21]  Sampsa Hyysalo,et al.  What difference does a living lab make? Comparing two health technology innovation projects , 2014 .

[22]  M. Westerlund,et al.  Linking Living Lab Characteristics and Their Outcomes : Towards a Conceptual Framework , 2013 .

[23]  Antonio de Amescua Seco,et al.  A process reference model for managing living labs for ICT innovation: A proposal based on ISO/IEC 15504 , 2013, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[24]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Designing for the living room: long-term user involvement in a living lab , 2013, CHI.

[25]  Kuei Kai Shao,et al.  Developing an Engineering Data Bank Service for the Precision Machinery Industry Cluster Using the Living Lab Concept , 2012 .

[26]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[27]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Realising the potential of environmental data: a call for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management , 2012, Environmental Evidence.

[28]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  Volker Wulf,et al.  At Home with Users: A Comparative View of Living Labs , 2015, Interact. Comput..

[30]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .