A method for the use of landscape metrics in freshwater research and management

Freshwater research and management efforts could be greatly enhanced by a better understanding of the relationship between landscape-scale factors and water quality indicators. This is particularly true in urban areas, where land transformation impacts stream systems at a variety of scales. Despite advances in landscape quantification methods, several studies attempting to elucidate the relationship between land use/land cover (LULC) and water quality have resulted in mixed conclusions. However, these studies have largely relied on compositional landscape metrics. For urban and urbanizing watersheds in particular, the use of metrics that capture spatial pattern may further aid in distinguishing the effects of various urban growth patterns, as well as exploring the interplay between environmental and socioeconomic variables. However, to be truly useful for freshwater applications, pattern metrics must be optimized based on characteristic watershed properties and common water quality point sampling methods. Using a freely available LULC data set for the Santa Clara Basin, California, USA, we quantified landscape composition and configuration for subwatershed areas upstream of individual sampling sites, reducing the number of metrics based on: (1) sensitivity to changes in extent and (2) redundancy, as determined by a multivariate factor analysis. The first two factors, interpreted as (1) patch density and distribution and (2) patch shape and landscape subdivision, explained approximately 85% of the variation in the data set, and are highly reflective of the heterogeneous urban development pattern found in the study area. Although offering slightly less explanatory power, compositional metrics can provide important contextual information.

[1]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecosystem Structure and Function along Urban‐Rural Gradients: An Unexploited Opportunity for Ecology , 1990 .

[2]  R. Sponseller,et al.  Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities , 2001 .

[3]  V. Resh,et al.  Streams in Mediterranean Climate Regions: Abiotic Influences and Biotic Responses to Predictable Seasonal Events , 1999 .

[4]  Lawrence D. Teeter,et al.  The use of remote sensing and GIS in watershed level analyses of non-point source pollution problems , 2000 .

[5]  J. Griffith.  Geographic Techniques and Recent Applications of Remote Sensing to Landscape-Water Quality Studies , 2002 .

[6]  F. Herzog,et al.  Supplementing Land-Use Statistics with Landscape Metrics: Some Methodological Considerations , 2001, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[7]  G. Host,et al.  Examining Land Use Influences on Stream Habitats and Macroinvertebrates , 1994 .

[8]  J. David Allan,et al.  Assessing Biotic Integrity of Streams: Effects of Scale in Measuring the Influence of Land Use/Cover and Habitat Structure on Fish and Macroinvertebrates , 1999, Environmental management.

[9]  E. E. Brabb,et al.  Geologic maps and structure sections of the southwestern Santa Clara Valley and southern Santa Cruz Mountains, Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties, California , 2001 .

[10]  James R. Karr,et al.  Assessing and Restoring the Health of Urban Streams in the Puget Sound Basin , 2002 .

[11]  Kevin P. Price,et al.  Landscape structure analysis of Kansas at three scales , 2000 .

[12]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change , 2005, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[13]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Landscape Ecology Explained@@@Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process , 2001 .

[14]  J. Baker,et al.  Assessing Landscape Condition Relative to Water Resources in the Western United States: A Strategic Approach , 2000 .

[15]  M. Barbour.  The re‐invention of biological assessment in the U.S. , 1997 .

[16]  David S. Leigh,et al.  Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation (Georgia, U.S.A.) , 2003 .

[17]  Dawn C. Parker,et al.  Measuring pattern outcomes in an agent-based model of edge-effect externalities using spatial metrics , 2004 .

[18]  Lawrence D. Teeter,et al.  Relationships Between Landscape Characteristics and Nonpoint Source Pollution Inputs to Coastal Estuaries , 1999, Environmental management.

[19]  R. O'Neill,et al.  A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  D. Knighton.  Fluvial forms and processes , 1984 .

[21]  S. D. Cooper,et al.  Implications of scale for patterns and processes in stream ecology , 1998 .

[22]  Stuart Gage,et al.  Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosystems , 1997 .

[23]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[24]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  LAND COVER ALONG AN URBAN-RURAL GRADIENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR WATER QUALITY , 1998 .

[25]  A. L. Dovciak,et al.  In Search of Effective Scales for Stream Management: Does Agroecoregion, Watershed, or Their Intersection Best Explain the Variance in Stream Macroinvertebrate Communities? , 2002, Environmental management.

[26]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  Quantifying Landscape Spatial Pattern: What Is the State of the Art? , 1998, Ecosystems.

[27]  J. David Allan,et al.  Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[28]  J. David Allan,et al.  Spatial patterns in land cover of exurbanizing watersheds in southeastern Michigan , 2004 .

[29]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to map spatial extent , 2001 .

[30]  H. B. N. Hynes,et al.  The stream and its valley , 1975 .

[31]  J. Allan,et al.  The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales , 1997 .

[32]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  J. Meyer,et al.  Streams in the Urban Landscape , 2001 .

[34]  L. Mertes,et al.  Remote sensing of riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[35]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Placing exurban land‐use change in a human modification framework , 2004 .

[36]  Cynthia Croissant,et al.  Landscape patterns and parcel boundaries: an analysis of composition and configuration of land use and land cover in south-central Indiana , 2004 .

[37]  Jane Southworth,et al.  From pattern to process: landscape fragmentation and the analysis of land use/land cover change , 2004 .

[38]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  Special Feature: The Use of Urban Gradients in Ecological Studies , 1990 .

[39]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems , 2002, Aquatic Sciences.

[40]  J. Lyons,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Habitat Rating System for Low‐Gradient Wisconsin Streams , 1998 .

[41]  Limin Yang,et al.  COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES , 2001 .