The Development of a Model to Examine Source-Receptor Relationships for Visibility on the Colorado Plateau.

This paper describes the development and application of the Visibility and Haze in the Western Atmosphere (VISHWA) model to understand the source-receptor relationships that govern chemical species relevant to visibility degradation in the western United States. The model was developed as part of a project referred to as Visibility Assessment for Regional Emission Distributions (VARED), the objective of which is to estimate the contributions of various geographical regions, compounds, and emission sources to light scattering and absorption by particles on the Colorado Plateau. The VISHWA model is a modified version of a comprehensive Eulerian model, known as the Acid Deposition and Oxidant Model.1 The modifications were designed to obtain the computational efficiency required to simulate a one-year period at about 1/25th of real time, and at the same time incorporate mechanistic features relevant to realistic modeling of the fate and transport of visibility degrading species. The modifications included use of a condensed chemical mechanism; incorporation of reactions to simulate the formation of secondary organic particles; and use of a semi-Lagrangian advection scheme to preserve concentration peaks during advection. The model was evaluated with 1992 air quality data from Project MOHAVE (Measurements of Haze and Visual Effects) intensive experiments. An important conclusion of this evaluation is that aqueous-phase oxidation of SO2 to sulfate in nonprecipitating clouds makes a significant contribution to observed sulfate levels during winter as well as summer. Model estimates of ambient sulfate for the winter intensive were within a factor of 2 of the observations for 75% of the values. The corresponding statistic for the summer intensive was 90%. Model estimates of carbon were within a factor of 2 of the limited set of observations.

[1]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol formation and transport , 1992 .

[2]  B. Hicks,et al.  Eddy-correlation measurements of the dry deposition of particulate sulfur and submicron particles , 1982 .

[3]  Christian Seigneur,et al.  A theoretical investigation of sulfate formation in clouds , 1988 .

[4]  W. Malm,et al.  Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States , 1994 .

[5]  Prakash Karamchandani,et al.  Testing a comprehensive acid deposition model , 1988 .

[6]  Alan C. Lloyd,et al.  A chemical mechanism for use in long‐range transport/acid deposition computer modeling , 1986 .

[7]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Measurements of the chemical composition of stratiform clouds , 1984 .

[8]  A. Venkatram,et al.  Results from a Comprehensive Acid Deposition Model: Predictions of Regional Ozone Concentrations , 1989 .

[9]  A. Venkatram,et al.  The role of non-precipitating clouds in producing ambient sulfate during summer: Results from simulations with the Acid Deposition and Oxidant Model (ADOM) , 1992 .

[10]  Paulette Middleton,et al.  A three‐dimensional Eulerian acid deposition model: Physical concepts and formulation , 1987 .

[11]  P. Smolarkiewicz,et al.  A class of semi-Lagrangian approximations for fluids. , 1992 .

[12]  M. Wesely,et al.  Measurements and parameterization of particulate sulfur dry deposition over grass , 1985 .

[13]  R. Wayland,et al.  EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Regional Oxidant Model (ROM2. 0): Evaluation on 1980 NEROS data bases. Report for January 1987-April 1989 , 1989 .

[14]  A. Venkatram,et al.  The development of the acid deposition and oxidant model (ADOM). , 1992, Environmental pollution.

[15]  B. Scherer,et al.  Simulation of an Acid Deposition Episode over Europe with the TADAP/ADOM Eulerian Regional Model , 1989 .

[16]  Prakash Karamchandani,et al.  The development and application of a simplified ozone modeling system (SOMS) , 1994 .