Ramon Llull: from ‘Ars electionis’ to social choice theory

Ramon Llull (Majorca c.1232–1316) is one of the earliest founding fathers of voting theory and social choice theory. The present article places Llull’s contributions and discussion in the historical context of elections in the medieval Church and the emergence of majority rule as a new general principle for making enforceable collective decisions in replacement of traditional unanimous requirements. To make the majority principle operational, Llull initially proposed a system of exhaustive binary comparisons that is more efficacious in producing a winner than the Condorcet system, in anticipation to the so called Copeland procedure. In contrast to some previous tentative suggestions, careful reading of Llull’s papers demonstrates that he did not propose a rank-order count system, such as those proposed later on by Cusanus and Borda. A new hypothesis is presented to explain Llull’s later proposal of an eliminatory system of partial binary comparisons. Some performance of Llull’s voting systems is estimated by innovative analysis of results in certain modern sports tournaments.

[1]  J. Colomer Political Institutions: Democracy and Social Choice , 2001 .

[2]  R. Lord The parliaments of the middle ages and the early modern period , 1930 .

[3]  Jules L. Coleman,et al.  Democracy and Social Choice , 1986, Ethics.

[4]  A. Bonner The Art and Logic of Ramon Llull: A User's Guide , 2007 .

[5]  Víctor Ferro El dret públic català : les institucions a Catalunya fins al Decret de Nova Planta , 1987 .

[6]  Dieter Gollmann,et al.  Electing the Doge of Venice: Analysis of a 13th Century Protocol , 2007, 20th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF'07).

[7]  Dan S. Felsenthal,et al.  After two centuries, should condorcet's voting procedure be implemented? , 1992 .

[8]  Arnold B. Urken,et al.  Classics of social choice , 1995 .

[9]  Marji Lines,et al.  Approval voting and strategy analysis: A Venetian example , 1986 .

[10]  Salvador Barberà,et al.  Ramon Llull: From the Ars Magna to Artificial Intelligence , 2011 .

[11]  Martin Gardner,et al.  Logic machines and diagrams , 1958 .

[12]  Ian McLean,et al.  Voting in the Medieval Papacy and Religious Orders , 2007, MDAI.

[13]  D. Saari,et al.  The Copeland method , 1996 .

[14]  J. Colomer,et al.  Social choice in medieval Europe , 2008 .

[15]  Iain McLean,et al.  The borda and condorcet principles: Three medieval applications , 1990 .

[16]  I. McLean,et al.  Ramon Llull and the theory of voting , 1992 .

[17]  The science of politics , 2001 .

[18]  Donald G. Saari,et al.  Copeland Method II: Manipulation, Monotonicity, and Paradoxes☆ , 1997 .

[19]  Josep M. Colomer,et al.  Handbook of Electoral System Choice , 2004 .

[20]  L. Moulin Les origines religieuses des techniques électorales et délibératives modernes , 1998 .

[21]  Friedrich Pukelsheim,et al.  Llull's writings on electoral systems , 2001 .

[22]  Josep M. Colomer,et al.  Electing Popes: Approval Balloting and Qualified-Majority Rule , 1998, Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

[23]  Jay S. Coggins,et al.  64% Majority rule in Ducal Venice: Voting for the Doge , 1998 .

[24]  Donald G. Saari,et al.  The Copeland method: I.: Relationships and the dictionary , 1996 .

[25]  A. Sen,et al.  Social Choice Theory , 1980 .

[26]  Sara L. Uckelman,et al.  Strategy and Manipulation in Medieval Elections , 2008 .

[27]  A rediscovered Llull tract and the Augsburg Web Edition of Llull´s electoral writings , 2004 .

[28]  J. Heinberg History of the Majority Principle , 1926 .

[29]  G. Thompson,et al.  The Theory of Committees and Elections. , 1959 .

[30]  A. A. J. Marley,et al.  Behavioral Social Choice - Probabilistic Models, Statistical Inference, and Applications , 2006 .

[31]  Herbert Döring Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe , 1995 .