The integrative power of online collective action networks beyond protest. Exploring social media use in the process of institutionalization

Abstract In this article, we aim at expanding the event-based and protest-centered perspective that is typically adopted to study the nexus between social media and movements. To this aim, we propose a network-based approach to explore the changing role that these tools play during the dynamic unfolding of movement processes and, more particularly, over the course of their institutionalization. In the first part, we read the added value of social media as a function of the ‘integrative power’ of the networks they foster – a unique and evolving form of sociotechnical power that springs from the virtuous encounter between social media networking potential and social resources. In the second part, we investigate this form of power by focusing directly on online networks’ structure as well as on the type of communication and participation environments they host. We apply our proposed approach to the longitudinal exploration of the Twitter networks deployed in the period 2012–2014 during three annual editions of the transnational feminist campaign ‘Take Back The Tech!’ (TBTT). Results from our case study suggest that, over time, TBTT supporters do in fact make a differentiated use of social media affordances – progressively switching their communicative strategies to better sustain the campaign’s efforts inside and outside institutional venues. Thus, the exploration of the TBTT case provides evidence of the usefulness of the proposed approach to reflect on the different modes in which social media can be exploited in different mobilization stages and political terrains.

[1]  Sylvia Walby,et al.  In-depth study on all forms of violence against women: Report of the Secretary General , 2006 .

[2]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network , 2011, Scientific reports.

[3]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest Diffusion , 2012, ArXiv.

[4]  Veronica Barassi Social Media, Immediacy and the Time for Democracy: Critical Reflections on Social Media as ‘Temporalising Practices , 2015 .

[5]  Rhiannon Morgan On Political Institutions and Social Movement Dynamics: The Case of the United Nations and the Global Indigenous Movement , 2007 .

[6]  Ivano Bison,et al.  Organizations, coalitions, and movements , 2004 .

[7]  M. Giugni,et al.  Contentious politics in complex societies: New social movements between conflict and cooperation , 1998 .

[8]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt , 2013 .

[9]  Emiliano Treré,et al.  Media Practices, Mediation Processes, and Mediatization in the Study of Social Movements , 2014 .

[10]  L. Bosi Incorporation and democratization: the long-term process of institutionalization of the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Movement , 2016 .

[11]  M. Giugni,et al.  The Consequences of Social Movements , 2016 .

[12]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[13]  Scott A. Golder,et al.  Chapter 10 – Twitter: Conversation, Entertainment, and Information, All in One Network! , 2011 .

[14]  M. Diani The Concept of Social Movement , 1992 .

[15]  A. Melucci Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age , 1997 .

[16]  M. M. Ferree,et al.  Feminism and the Women's Movement: A Global Perspective , 2007 .

[17]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[18]  Mario Diani,et al.  Networks and Internet into Perspective1 , 2011 .

[19]  P. Leonardi Materiality, Sociomateriality, and Socio-Technical Systems: What Do These Terms Mean? How are They Related? Do We Need Them? , 2012 .

[20]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  Networked: The New Social Operating System , 2013, Int. J. E Politics.

[21]  C. Epstein The Women’s Movement Inside and Outside the State , 2011 .

[22]  M. Diani The Cement of Civil Society: Studying Networks in Localities , 2015 .

[23]  E. Pavan Embedding Digital Communications Within Collective Action Networks: A Multidimensional Network Approach , 2014 .

[24]  Doowon Suh Institutionalizing Social Movements: The Dual Strategy of the Korean Women's Movement , 2011 .

[25]  Saumitra Das,et al.  Interplay between NS3 protease and human La protein regulates translation-replication switch of Hepatitis C virus , 2011, Scientific reports.

[26]  M. Tremayne,et al.  Anatomy of Protest in the Digital Era: A Network Analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street , 2014 .

[27]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Evolution of online user behavior during a social upheaval , 2014, WebSci '14.

[28]  W. Bennett,et al.  THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION , 2012 .

[29]  Mario Diani,et al.  Social Movements and Networks , 2003 .

[30]  Manuel Jiménez Consolidation through institutionalisation? Dilemmas of the Spanish environmental movement in the 1990s , 1999 .

[31]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement and analysis of online social networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[32]  M. Durfee,et al.  Contentious Politics , 2017 .

[33]  Dan Mercea,et al.  Serial activists: Political Twitter beyond influentials and the twittertariat , 2016, New Media Soc..

[34]  W. Bennett,et al.  Three Patterns of Power in Technology-Enabled Contention , 2014 .

[35]  P. Almeida,et al.  The Formation of State Actor-Social Movement Coalitions and Favorable Policy Outcomes , 2004 .

[36]  Mario Diani,et al.  Networks and Social Movements: A Research Programme , 2003 .