A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.

In general excellent results cannot be guaranteed when using resin-based composites for posterior restorations. This is due to polymerization shrinkage which can still be regarded as the primary negative characteristic of composite resins. A review of available literature regarding the polymerization process, its flaws, and suggested strategies to avoid shrinkage stress was conducted. Several factors responsible for the polymerization process may negatively affect the integrity of the tooth-restoration complex. There is no straightforward way of handling adhesive restorative materials that can guarantee the reliability of a restoration. At present, the practitioner has to coexist with the problem of polymerization shrinkage and destructive shrinkage stress. However, evolving improvements associated with resin-based composite materials, dental adhesives, filling, and light curing techniques have improved the predictability of such restorations. This critical review paper is meant to be a useful contribution to the recognition and understanding of problems related to polymerization shrinkage and to provide clinicians with the opportunity to improve the quality of composite resin restorations.

[1]  G. Dickson,et al.  Hardening Shrinkage and Hygroscopic Expansion of Composite Resins , 1982, Journal of dentistry research.

[2]  C. Davidson,et al.  Polymerization contraction and conversion of light-curing BisGMA-based methacrylate resins. , 1993, Biomaterials.

[3]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[4]  B. Smith,et al.  In vitro studies of cuspal movement produced by adhesive restorative materials , 1986, British Dental Journal.

[5]  E. Asmussen,et al.  Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[6]  A. Reis,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage: effects of constraint and filling technique in composite restorations. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  J. W. Curtis,et al.  Factors affecting cure at depths within light-activated resin composites. , 1993, American journal of dentistry.

[8]  N. Meredith,et al.  In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  E. Greener,et al.  Correlation between degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. , 1990, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[10]  J. W. Curtis,et al.  Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. , 1994, Operative dentistry.

[11]  M. Jensen,et al.  Posterior composite polymerization shrinkage in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three techniques. , 1986, Pediatric dentistry.

[12]  D. L. Smith,et al.  Direct filling resins: dimensional changes resulting from polymerization shrinkage and water sorption. , 1953, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[13]  I Krejci,et al.  Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. , 1986, Quintessence international.

[14]  R. Browne,et al.  Pulpal response to a glass ionomer cement , 1978, British Dental Journal.

[15]  R. Grajower,et al.  The effect of three filling techniques on marginal leakage around Class II composite resin restorations in vitro. , 1989, Quintessence international.

[16]  N Bichacho The centripetal build-up for composite resin posterior restorations. , 1994, Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry : PPAD.

[17]  J. Y. Thompson,et al.  A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. , 1998, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[18]  K. Warren An investigation into the microhardness of a light cured composite when cured through varying thicknesses of porcelain. , 1990, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[19]  Blank Lw,et al.  A visible-light-activated resin cured through tooth structure. , 1988 .

[20]  E. K. Hansen,et al.  Wall-to-wall polymerization contraction of composite resins versus filler content. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[21]  D. Bardwell Adhesion: The Silent Revolution in Dentistry , 2001 .

[22]  G. Willems,et al.  Assessment by Nano-indentation of the Hardness and Elasticity of the Resin-Dentin Bonding Area , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[23]  Alan D. Wilson,et al.  The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine , 1985, British Dental Journal.

[24]  C. Davidson,et al.  Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. , 1995, European journal of oral sciences.

[25]  D C Watts,et al.  Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[26]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  The Relationship Between Test Methodology and Elastic Behavior of Composites , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[27]  I. Krejci,et al.  Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques. , 1991, Journal of dentistry.

[28]  A. H. Tjan,et al.  Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  A. Segura,et al.  In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. , 1993, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[30]  Antheunis Versluis,et al.  Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[31]  F Lutz,et al.  Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. , 1986, Quintessence international.

[32]  E. K. Hansen Effect of Scotchbond dependent on cavity cleaning, cavity diameter and cavosurface angle. , 1984, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[33]  E. Swift,et al.  Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. , 1996, American journal of dentistry.

[34]  A. Feilzer,et al.  Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[35]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Effect of stepped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite. , 2000, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[36]  T R Katona,et al.  Finite Element Stress Analysis of Three Filling Techniques for Class V Light-cured Composite Restorations , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[37]  H. Kato Relationship between the velocity of polymerization and adaptation to dentin cavity wall of light-cured composite. , 1987, Dental materials journal.

[38]  J L Ferracane,et al.  In vitro Wear of Composite with Varied Cure, Filler Level, and Filler Treatment , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[39]  W H Douglas,et al.  Effects of polymerization contraction in composite restorations. , 1992, Journal of dentistry.

[40]  A. D. de Gee Some aspects of vacuum mixing of composite resins and its effect on porosity. , 1979, Quintessence international, dental digest.

[41]  F. Barbakow,et al.  Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[42]  B Van Meerbeek,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. , 1999, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[43]  J. H. Lai,et al.  Measuring polymerization shrinkage of photo-activated restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[44]  C. Davidson,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[45]  C. Davidson,et al.  Relaxation of Polymerization Contraction Stresses by Flow in Dental Composites , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[46]  T. Yanagawa,et al.  Effect of composition and curing type of composite on adaptation to dentin cavity wall. , 1986, Dental materials journal.

[47]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Contraction Stress Related to Degree of Conversion and Reaction Kinetics , 2002 .

[48]  M. Braden,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage of methacrylate esters. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[49]  H. Shimokobe,et al.  [Composite resin restorations in posterior teeth]. , 1983, Shikai tenbo = Dental outlook.

[50]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Effect of light exposure on fracture toughness and flexural strength of light-cured composites. , 1996, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[51]  D. Pashley,et al.  Clinical considerations of microleakage. , 1990, Journal of endodontics.

[52]  G. Ambrosano,et al.  The effects of filling techniques and a low-viscosity composite liner on bond strength to class II cavities. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[53]  R. Hickel,et al.  Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[54]  G. Leloup,et al.  Dynamic and static moduli of elasticity of resin-based materials. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[55]  C. Davidson,et al.  Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[56]  C. Davidson,et al.  Relaxation of Polymerization Contraction Shear Stress by Hygroscopic Expansion , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[57]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. , 2003, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[58]  T. Fox,et al.  Cross-linked Polymers. I. Factors Influencing the Efficiency of Cross-linking in Copolymers of Methyl Methacrylate and Glycol Dimethacrylates1 , 1953 .

[59]  de Gee Aj Some aspects of vacuum mixing of composite resins and its effect on porosity. , 1979 .

[60]  R. Lakes,et al.  Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[61]  J. Ferracane,et al.  The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[62]  F. Barbakow,et al.  The importance of proximal curing in posterior composite resin restorations. , 1992, Quintessence international.

[63]  R. Lakes,et al.  Polymerization shrinkage of composite resins: comparison with tooth deformation. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[64]  M. Cross,et al.  Does an Incremental Filling Technique Reduce Polymerization Shrinkage Stresses? , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[65]  K. Hiller,et al.  Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization". , 2000, Operative dentistry.

[66]  C. Davidson,et al.  Destructive Stresses in Adhesive Luting Cements , 1991, Journal of dental research.

[67]  J. McCabe,et al.  The polymerization contraction of visible-light activated composite resins. , 1988, Journal of dentistry.

[68]  C. Davidson Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. , 1986, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[69]  G. Unterbrink,et al.  Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. , 1995, Journal of dentistry.

[70]  C. Davidson,et al.  The Competition between the Composite-Dentin Bond Strength and the Polymerization Contraction Stress , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[71]  M. Suzuki,et al.  Glass ionomer-composite sandwich technique. , 1990, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[72]  R. Sakaguchi,et al.  Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites , 1998 .

[73]  D. Klaff Blending incremental and stratified layering techniques to produce an esthetic posterior composite resin restoration with a predictable prognosis. , 2001, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[74]  A. Feilzer,et al.  The Dependence of Shrinkage Stress Reduction on Porosity Concentration in Thin Resin Layers , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[75]  Liebenberg Wh Successive cusp build-up: an improved placement technique for posterior direct resin restorations. , 1996 .

[76]  R. Bowen,et al.  Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. VI. Forces developing in direct-filling materials during hardening. , 1967, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[77]  M. Torii,et al.  Comparison of polymerization contraction stresses between self- and light-curing composites. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.