Absence of iatrogenic or contagion effects in adolescent group therapy: findings from the Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) study.

Though widely used and presumed effective in practice, some scholars (Dishion et al., 1999) have raised the concern that group therapy for adolescents with substance use disorder and a range of deviancy has the potential for causing iatrogenic effects (e.g., increased substance use, behavior and legal problems) for those with low deviancy. Using data from 400 youth in the largest adolescent treatment experiment conducted to date (Dennis et al., 2004), this study shows that group composition in terms of conduct disorder symptoms is not associated with worse substance use, psychological, environmental or legal treatment outcomes. The results actually indicated that there was a slight advantage for youth with high conduct disorder to be included in the groups with less symptoms. The results appear consistent with recent meta-analyses of delinquency studies (Lipsey, 2006) which have found no evidence of iatrogenic effects. These results support the common clinical belief that group therapy for youths with substance use disorders is a safe and effective treatment modality.

[1]  R. Kadden,et al.  Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescent Cannabis Users: 5 Sessions (Cannabis Youth Treatment (Cyt) Series) - Volume 1. , 2013 .

[2]  J. Weisz,et al.  Iatrogenic effects of group treatment for antisocial youths. , 2005, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[3]  Y. Kaminer.  Challenges and opportunities of group therapy for adolescent substance abuse: a critical review. , 2005, Addictive behaviors.

[4]  Thomas J. Dishion,et al.  Peer Contagion in Interventions for Children and Adolescents: Moving Towards an Understanding of the Ecology and Dynamics of Change , 2005, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[5]  Joan McCord,et al.  Peer Influence in Children and Adolescents: Crossing the Bridge from Developmental to Intervention Science , 2005, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[6]  H. Stattin,et al.  Unstructured youth recreation centre participation and antisocial behaviour development: Selection influences and the moderating role of antisocial peers , 2004 .

[7]  Thomas Babor,et al.  The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study: main findings from two randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[8]  K. O’grady,et al.  Evaluation of a group-based substance abuse treatment program for adolescents. , 2004, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[9]  B. Gorman,et al.  Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anger in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis , 2004 .

[10]  R. S. Green,et al.  Treatment outcomes among adolescents with substance abuse problems: the relationship between comorbidities and post-treatment substance involvement , 2003 .

[11]  M. Roebuck,et al.  Outpatient Marijuana Treatment for Adolescents , 2003, Evaluation review.

[12]  Christy K. Scott,et al.  The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) experiment: rationale, study design and analysis plans. , 2002, Addiction.

[13]  G. Diamond,et al.  Characteristics and problems of 600 adolescent cannabis abusers in outpatient treatment. , 2002, Addiction.

[14]  H. Liddle,et al.  Five outpatient treatment models for adolescent marijuana use: a description of the Cannabis Youth Treatment Interventions. , 2002, Addiction.

[15]  M. Roebuck,et al.  The economic cost of outpatient marijuana treatment for adolescents: findings from a multi-site field experiment. , 2002, Addiction.

[16]  M. Larimer,et al.  Treating adolescents together or individually? Issues in adolescent substance abuse interventions. , 2002, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[17]  J. Hughes,et al.  Differential Benefits of Skills Training With Antisocial Youth Based On Group Composition: A Meta-Analytic Investigation , 2002 .

[18]  J. Petrocelli.  Effectiveness of Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for General Symptomatology: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[19]  T. Dishion,et al.  3-Year Iatrogenic Effects Associated With Aggregating High-Risk Adolescents in Cognitive-Behavioral Preventive Interventions , 2001 .

[20]  Thomas R. Peterson,et al.  Treatment outcomes for adolescent substance abuse at 4- and 7-month assessments. , 2001, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[21]  T. Dishion,et al.  Peer group dynamics associated with iatrogenic effects in group interventions with high-risk young adolescents. , 2001, New directions for child and adolescent development.

[22]  E. Opland,et al.  The effectiveness of the Minnesota Model approach in the treatment of adolescent drug abusers. , 2000, Addiction.

[23]  K. Dodge.  Cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy for child aggression: First, is there cost effectiveness? Comment on Shechtman and Ben-David (1999). , 1999 .

[24]  T. Dishion,et al.  When interventions harm. Peer groups and problem behavior. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[25]  J. Hughes,et al.  First Do No Harm: Adverse Effects of Grouping Deviant Youth for Skills Training , 1999 .

[26]  B. Rounsaville,et al.  Psychotherapies for adolescent substance abusers: a pilot study. , 1998, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[27]  G. Burlingame,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of child and adolescent group treatment: a meta-analytic review. , 1997, Journal of clinical child psychology.

[28]  G. S. Pettit,et al.  Social information-processing patterns partially mediate the effect of early physical abuse on later conduct problems. , 1995, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[29]  T. Dishion,et al.  Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. , 1995, Child development.

[30]  G. D. Gottfredson.  PEER GROUP INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE THE RISK OF DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR: A SELECTIVE REVIEW AND A NEW EVALUATION* , 1987 .

[31]  J. McCord,et al.  A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. , 1978, The American psychologist.

[32]  C. Widom,et al.  Juvenile crime, juvenile justice , 2001 .

[33]  T. Dishion,et al.  The Peer Influence Paradox: Friendship Quality and Deviancy Training Within Male Adolescent Friendships. , 1999 .

[34]  M. Myers,et al.  The Adolescent Relapse Coping Questionnaire: psychometric validation. , 1996, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[35]  R. Feldman,et al.  The St. Louis conundrum : the effective treatment of antisocial youths , 1984 .

[36]  Edwin Powers,et al.  An experiment in the prevention of delinquency : the Cambridge Somerville youth study , 1952 .