Balance control in peripheral neuropathy: are patients equally unstable under static and dynamic conditions?

The aim of this investigation was to assess the potentially different effects of impaired proprioceptive input in balance control under static and dynamic conditions in neuropathic patients. We recruited 20 normal subjects and 27 patients affected by neuropathies known to affect to a different extent large and medium size afferent fibres. The patients comprised 5 with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A), 8 with CMT type 2 (CMT2) and 14 with Diabetes polyneuropathy (Diabetics). Measurement of balance during quiet stance on a stabilometric platform showed that sway area (SA) was larger in the CMT2 and Diabetics than normal subjects or in CMT1A, under both eyes open and closed conditions. The estimated conduction velocity (CV) of the group II afferent fibres was lower in CMT2 and Diabetics than in normal subjects and CMT1A. Across all patients, SA increased as a function of the slowing of group II CV. During a dynamic balance task the head A-P displacement was only slightly increased in the patient groups with respect to normals, despite the increased delay at which the head followed displacement of the feet. The unpredictably good performance of all patient groups under dynamic condition, which was at variance with their imbalance during quiet stance, may indicate that these patients learnt to exploit anticipatory postural strategies.

[1]  T. Ledin,et al.  Dynamic posturography in assessment of polyneuropathic disease. , 1990, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[2]  P. Morasso,et al.  Can muscle stiffness alone stabilize upright standing? , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Derr,et al.  Postural Instability in Patients with Diabetic Sensory Neuropathy , 1994, Diabetes Care.

[4]  T Mergner,et al.  Vestibular-neck interaction and transformation of sensory coordinates. , 1997, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[5]  Antonio Nardone,et al.  Standing on a continuously moving platform: is body inertia counteracted or exploited? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Régine Roll,et al.  From balance regulation to body orientation: two goals for muscle proprioceptive information processing? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  M Schieppati,et al.  Group II spindle afferent fibers in humans: their possible role in the reflex control of stance. , 1999, Progress in brain research.

[8]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Report and recommendations of the San Antonio Conference on Diabetic Neuropathy* , 1988, Neurology.

[9]  Constantinos N Maganaris,et al.  Paradoxical muscle movement in human standing , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Marco Schieppati,et al.  Group II spindle fibres and afferent control of stance. Clues from diabetic neuropathy , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The role of plantar cutaneous sensation in unperturbed stance , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  F. Honegger,et al.  Triggering of balance corrections and compensatory strategies in a patient with total leg proprioceptive loss , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  S Corna,et al.  Postural coordination in elderly subjects standing on a periodically moving platform. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Proprioceptive, visual and vestibular thresholds for the perception of sway during standing in humans. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  R. Peterka,et al.  Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  P. Dyck,et al.  Human diabetic endoneurial sorbitol, fructose, and myo‐inositol related to sural nerve morphometry , 1980, Annals of neurology.

[17]  H C Diener,et al.  On the role of vestibular, visual and somatosensory information for dynamic postural control in humans. , 1988, Progress in brain research.

[18]  J. Massion Postural control system , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  F B Horak,et al.  Somatosensory loss increases vestibulospinal sensitivity. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Schieppati,et al.  Early and late stretch responses of human foot muscles induced by perturbation of stance , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  F B Horak,et al.  Vestibular loss disrupts control of head and trunk on a sinusoidally moving platform. , 2001, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[22]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  M. Schieppati,et al.  Variability in a dynamic postural task attests ample flexibility in balance control mechanisms , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  M. Schieppati,et al.  Medium-latency response to muscle stretch in human lower limb: estimation of conduction velocity of group II fibres and central delay , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  Gurfinkel Ev,et al.  Physical foundations of stabilography. , 1973 .

[26]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Body sway and vibration perception thresholds in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. , 1995, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[27]  D. Pareyson Differential diagnosis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related neuropathies , 2004, Neurological Sciences.