Combined intravenous and endovascular treatment versus primary mechanical thrombectomy. The Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke

Background Whether mechanical thrombectomy alone may achieve better or at least equal clinical outcome than mechanical thrombectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis is a matter of debate. Methods From the Italian Registry of Endovascular Stroke Treatment, we extracted all cases treated with intravenous thrombolysis followed by mechanical thrombectomy or with primary mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke due to proximal vessel occlusion. We included only patients who would have qualified for intravenous thrombolysis. We compared outcomes of the two groups by using multivariate regression analysis and propensity score method. Results We included 1148 patients, treated with combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy therapy (n = 635; 55.3%), or with mechanical thrombectomy alone (n = 513; 44.7%). Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics did not differ between the two groups, except for a shorter onset to groin puncture time (p < 0.05) in the mechanical thrombectomy group. A shift in the 90-day modified Rankin Scale distributions toward a better outcome was found in favor of the combined treatment (adjusted common odds ratio  = 1.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.04–1.66). Multivariate analyses on binary outcome show that subjects who underwent combined treatment had higher probability to survive with modified Rankin Scale 0–3 (odds ratio = 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 1.04–1.95) and lower case fatality rate (odds ratio = 0.6; 95% confidence interval: 0.44–0.9). Hemorrhagic transformation did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion These data seem to indicate that combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy could be associated with lower probability of death or severe dependency after three months from stroke due to large vessel occlusion, supporting the current guidelines of treating eligible patients with intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy.

[1]  M. Mazighi,et al.  Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcomes With or Without Intravenous Thrombolysis: Insight From the ASTER Randomized Trial , 2018, Stroke.

[2]  G. Schroth,et al.  Direct Mechanical Intervention Versus Combined Intravenous and Mechanical Intervention in Large Artery Anterior Circulation Stroke: A Matched-Pairs Analysis , 2016, Stroke.

[3]  A. Larcher,et al.  Prior IV Thrombolysis Facilitates Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke. , 2015, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[4]  D. Leys,et al.  Intravenous Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator: Influence on Outcome in Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke Treated by Mechanical Thrombectomy , 2018, Stroke.

[5]  A. Rudd,et al.  Endovascular thrombectomy in anterior circulation stroke and clinical value of bridging with intravenous thrombolysis , 2018, Acta radiologica.

[6]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: the Pragmatic Ischaemic Stroke Thrombectomy Evaluation (PISTE) randomised, controlled trial , 2016, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[7]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Successful Reperfusion With Intravenous Thrombolysis Preceding Mechanical Thrombectomy in Large-Vessel Occlusions , 2018, Stroke.

[8]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Endovascular thrombectomy with or without systemic thrombolysis? , 2017, Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders.

[9]  M. Mokin,et al.  Is bridging with intravenous thrombolysis of any benefit in endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke? , 2014, World neurosurgery.

[10]  M. Dichgans,et al.  Preceding Intravenous Thrombolysis Facilitates Endovascular Mechanical Recanalization in Large Intracranial Artery Occlusion , 2012, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[11]  Gerhard Schroth,et al.  Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Solitaire Flow Restoration in Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2013, Stroke.

[12]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA.

[13]  M. Krause,et al.  Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  A. Rai,et al.  Intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular therapy for large vessel strokes can lead to significantly higher hospital costs without improving outcomes , 2017, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[15]  D. Inzitari,et al.  Intravenous Thrombolysis and Intra-Arterial Interventions in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Italian Stroke Organisation (ISO)-Spread Guidelines , 2015, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[16]  K. Berger,et al.  Direct Mechanical Intervention Versus Bridging Therapy in Stroke Patients Eligible for Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Pooled Analysis of 2 Registries , 2017, Stroke.

[17]  P Trouillas,et al.  Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. , 1998, Lancet.

[18]  R. Rosenfeld Patients , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[19]  J. Saver,et al.  Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Combined Intravenous and Mechanical Thrombectomy in Large-Artery Anterior Circulation Stroke: A Topical Review , 2017, Stroke.

[20]  C. Kessler,et al.  Intravenous Thrombolysis and Passes of Thrombectomy as Predictors for Endovascular Revascularization in Ischemic Stroke. , 2016, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[21]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy with and without bridging thrombolysis for acute large vessel occlusion ischaemic stroke , 2019, Internal medicine journal.

[22]  Y. Xiong,et al.  Direct endovascular treatment: an alternative for bridging therapy in anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion stroke , 2017, European journal of neurology.

[23]  Jaehoon Lee,et al.  A practical guide to propensity score analysis for applied clinical research. , 2017, Behaviour research and therapy.

[24]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  M. Krause,et al.  Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  R. Higashida,et al.  Trial Design and Reporting Standards for Intra-Arterial Cerebral Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2003, Stroke.

[27]  K. Berger,et al.  Comparison of outcome and interventional complication rate in patients with acute stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy with and without bridging thrombolysis , 2016, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[28]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  D. Inzitari,et al.  The Italian Registry of Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke: rationale, design and baseline features of patients , 2015, Neurological Sciences.

[30]  J. Grotta,et al.  Combined intravenous and intra-arterial r-TPA versus intra-arterial therapy of acute ischemic stroke: Emergency Management of Stroke (EMS) Bridging Trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[31]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  H. Diener,et al.  Analysis of Workflow and Time to Treatment and the Effects on Outcome in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results from the SWIFT PRIME Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2016, Radiology.

[33]  C. Kabbasch,et al.  Intravenous Thrombolysis Facilitates Successful Recanalization with Stent-Retriever Mechanical Thrombectomy in Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions. , 2016, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[34]  Elad I Levy,et al.  Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[35]  R. Jahan,et al.  Combined Intravenous Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy vs Thrombectomy Alone for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of the SWIFT and STAR Studies , 2017, JAMA neurology.

[36]  M. Fusco,et al.  Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcomes With and Without Intravenous Thrombolysis in Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis , 2017, Stroke.

[37]  Stephen R Cole,et al.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[38]  Á. Chamorro,et al.  Outcomes After Direct Thrombectomy or Combined Intravenous and Endovascular Treatment Are Not Different , 2017, Stroke.

[39]  H. Diener,et al.  Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  R. Leker,et al.  Is Bridging Necessary? A Pilot Study of Bridging versus Primary Stentriever-Based Endovascular Reperfusion in Large Anterior Circulation Strokes. , 2015, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[41]  J. Ferro,et al.  Endovascular treatment versus medical care alone for ischaemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[42]  Catherine Oppenheim,et al.  Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet Neurology.

[43]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[44]  M. Kaste,et al.  Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II) , 1998, The Lancet.