Female gender and post-ERCP pancreatitis: Is the association caused by difficult cannulation?

Abstract Objective. Female gender is a well-known risk factor for the development of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis, but the underlying mechanism for this increased risk has remained unknown. We hypothesize that cannulation difficulty might play a part in this association. The aim of the current study was to determine whether the female papilla is more difficult to cannulate than the male papilla. Material and methods. Prospective data collection with emphasis on cannulation was conducted in 364 consecutive biliary ERCP procedures performed by very experienced ERCP endoscopists through native papilla in a tertiary referral university hospital. Results. Although the cannulation times seemed to be longer and alternative cannulation techniques seemed to be needed more frequently for successful cannulation in female than male patients, no statistically significant differences (p = 0.061 and 0.054, respectively) in the cannulation process could be found between the genders. Conclusions. The study was not able to confirm that the cannulation of the female papilla is more troublesome than the cannulation of the male papilla.

[1]  P. Salminen,et al.  Double-guidewire-assisted biliary cannulation: experiences from a single tertiary referral center , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  K. Byth,et al.  Needle-knife sphincterotomy: factors predicting its use and the relationship with post-ERCP pancreatitis (with video). , 2010, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[3]  J. Calleja,et al.  Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  Ji-Young Park,et al.  Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[5]  N. Fujita,et al.  Pancreatic guidewire placement for achieving selective biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. , 2008, World journal of gastroenterology.

[6]  P. Salminen,et al.  Female gender may give rise to difficulties in endoscopic and laparoscopic biliary surgery , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  M. Bourke,et al.  A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis , 2008, Endoscopy.

[8]  H. Okada,et al.  Evaluation of needle-knife precut papillotomy after unsuccessful biliary cannulation, especially with regard to postoperative anatomic factors , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  P. Williamson,et al.  Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study , 2007, Endoscopy.

[10]  P. Williamson,et al.  Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice , 2006, Gut.

[11]  M'hamed Temkit,et al.  Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Prospective Multicenter Study , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[12]  J. Grönroos,et al.  Needle-knife assisted ERCP , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[13]  J. van Dam,et al.  Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. , 2002, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[14]  T. Zágoni,et al.  Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  C Liguory,et al.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. , 1991, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.