Lake Ecological Assessment Systems and Intercalibration for the European Water Framework Directive: Aims, Achievements and Further Challenges

Abstract The Water Framework Directive (WFD) has been published in 2000 and the process of its implementation has created a new paradigm in the understanding of ecological status of water bodies in Europe. The Directive explicitly requires that ecological status is assessed through the analysis of various characteristics of aquatic flora and fauna. An Intercalibration exercise is foreseen to identify and resolve significant inconsistencies between the ecological quality classifications of EU Member States to ensure that the obligation to reach good status has the same meaning throughout Europe. The results of the first Lake Intercalibration exercise (2003-2008) are the setting of reference conditions and class boundaries for phytoplankton biomass metrics for all lake intercalibration types and all geographical regions of the EU. Work on macrophyte assessment methods has been carried out in the Alpine, Central/Baltic and Northern region, while only Alpine and Mediterranean countries have succeeded to develop and harmonize phytoplankton composition assessment methods. The aim of the second phase of intercalibration (2008-2011) is to close these gaps and improve the comparability of the results in time for the second river basin management plans due in 2015.

[1]  3 Ecosystems and Human Well-being , 2022 .

[2]  M. Zaman-Allah,et al.  Ecological engineering : from concepts to applications Nodular diagnosis for ecological engineering of the symbiotic nitrogen fixation with legumes , 2011 .

[3]  Paul J. Harrison,et al.  Estimating carbon, nitrogen, protein, and chlorophyll a from volume in marine phytoplankton , 1994 .

[4]  B. Riemann,et al.  The carbon and chlorophyll content of phytoplankton from various nutrient regimes , 1989 .

[5]  C. Sandu,et al.  Chlorophyll-a determination - a reliable method for phytoplankton biomass assessment , 2003 .

[6]  Carmen Revenga,et al.  Pilot analysis of global ecosystems : freshwater systems , 2000 .

[7]  Garrette Clark,et al.  Evolution of the global sustainable consumption and production policy and the United Nations Environment Programme's (UNEP) supporting activities , 2007 .

[8]  M. Simona,et al.  Phytoplankton as an Indicator of the Water Quality of the Deep Lakes South of the Alps , 2006, Hydrobiologia.

[9]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[10]  F. H. Rigler,et al.  The phosphorus‐chlorophyll relationship in lakes1,2 , 1974 .

[11]  A. McMichael,et al.  Ecosystems and Human well-being , 2003 .

[12]  L. Vörös,et al.  Phytoplankton biomass and chlorophyll-a in some shallow lakes in central Europe , 1991, Hydrobiologia.

[13]  C. Forsberg,et al.  EUTROPHICATION PARAMETERS AND TROPHIC STATE INDICES IN 30 SWEDISH WASTE-RECEIVING LAKES , 1980 .

[14]  E. Willén.  Växtplankton i sjöar , 2007 .

[15]  R. Stephenson.  A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  Agnieszka Kolada,et al.  Abiotic typology of Polish lakes , 2005 .

[17]  Erik Jeppesen,et al.  Water Framework Directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes , 2005 .

[18]  F. Gary,et al.  A Reference Based Typology and Ecological Assessment System for Irish Lakes - Preliminary Investigation - Final Report , 2006 .

[19]  P. Sandra,et al.  Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report. Part 2: Lakes , 2009 .

[20]  R. Carlson.  A trophic state index for lakes1 , 1977 .

[21]  A. Kathuria,et al.  Change in cyanobacterial biovolume due to preservation by Lugol's Iodine , 2005 .

[22]  O. Pietiläinen,et al.  Chlorophyll–nutrient relationships of different lake types using a large European dataset , 2008, Aquatic Ecology.

[23]  J. S. Hughes,et al.  Plants for Environmental Studies , 1997 .