Socio-demographic and other patient characteristics associated with time between colonoscopy and surgery, and choice of treatment centre for colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Objectives To investigate key patient clinical and demographic characteristics associated with time between colonoscopy and surgery, and choice of treatment centre for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This will add to the little published research examining the pathway following CRC diagnosis and prior to surgery. Design Retrospective cohort analysis of linked data. Setting A population-based sample of people diagnosed August 2004 to December 2007 in New South Wales, Australia. Participants 569 CRC patients, of whom 407 (72%, 95% CI 68% to 75%) had colonoscopy followed by surgery. Primary outcome measures Time between colonoscopy and surgery, and whether the surgery took place in a specialist cancer centre. Results Among the 407 eligible patients analysed, the median time from colonoscopy to surgery was 19 days (IQR 12–29 days). After adjusting for key demographic and clinical characteristics such as age and disease stage, the time was longer for rectal cancer patients and those reporting fair/poor health, although differences in medians were <5 days. 24% (95% CI 20% to 28%) had surgery in a specialist cancer centre, which was more common among people resident in metropolitan areas (37% vs 14% for others, adjusted p=0.001) and those without private health insurance (30% vs 21% for others, adjusted p=0.03). Conclusions There do not appear to be systemic issues affecting time from colonoscopy to surgery related to patients' socio-demographic characteristics. However, patients with private insurance and those living in rural areas may be less likely to receive optimal specialist treatment. A more systematic approach might be needed to ensure cancer patients are treated in specialist cancer centres, particularly patients requiring more specialised treatment.

[1]  M. Thompson,et al.  Evidence of the effect of ‘specialization’ on the management, surgical outcome and survival from colorectal cancer in Wessex , 2003, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[3]  U. Gunnarsson,et al.  Surgeon and hospital‐related risk factors in colorectal cancer surgery , 2011, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[4]  David P. Smith,et al.  Cancer screening among migrants in an Australian cohort; cross-sectional analyses from the 45 and Up Study , 2009, BMC public health.

[5]  C. McArdle,et al.  Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancer , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  A. Spigelman People with colorectal cancer: can we help them do better? , 2004, ANZ journal of surgery.

[7]  L. Siminoff,et al.  Doctor, what's wrong with me? Factors that delay the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[8]  Time to diagnosis and mortality in colorectal cancer: a cohort study in primary care , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  David P. Smith,et al.  Using linked routinely collected health data to describe prostate cancer treatment in New South Wales, Australia: a validation study , 2011, BMC health services research.

[10]  V. Beral,et al.  Cohort Profile: The 45 and Up Study , 2007, International journal of epidemiology.

[11]  Tony Blakely,et al.  Survival disparities in Indigenous and non-Indigenous New Zealanders with colon cancer: the role of patient comorbidity, treatment and health service factors , 2010, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[12]  Bruce K Armstrong,et al.  Remoteness of residence and survival from cancer in New South Wales , 2004, The Medical journal of Australia.

[13]  David G Steel,et al.  Investigation of relative risk estimates from studies of the same population with contrasting response rates and designs , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.

[14]  D. Jolley,et al.  The Effect of Provider Case Volume on Cancer Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis , 2009, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[15]  T. Risberg,et al.  Diagnostic delay causes more psychological distress in female than in male cancer patients. , 1996, Anticancer research.

[16]  N. Campbell,et al.  Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  C. Begg,et al.  Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume as Predictors of Outcome Following Rectal Cancer Resection , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[18]  John Harding,et al.  Cancer survival and prevalence in Australia: cancers diagnosed from 1982 to 2004 , 2008 .

[19]  E. Banks,et al.  Population characteristics related to colorectal cancer testing in New South Wales, Australia: results from the 45 and Up Study cohort , 2008, Journal of medical screening.

[20]  S. Cole,et al.  Equity of colorectal cancer screening: cross‐sectional analysis of National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia , 2011, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.