Outdoor characterization and comparison of string and MLPE under clear and partially shaded conditions

Building integrated and building attached photovoltaic (BIPV, BAPV) systems may suffer from lower performance than predicted as a result of unwanted partial shading. New system architectures have been proposed to optimize performance. The common approach of these new architectures is to track the maximum power point of every solar module individually. This paper demonstrates the effect of shading on energy yield by evaluating power level management on the module level compared to string level. Three independent PV systems were installed and extensively monitored in Eindhoven, a reference string inverter system, a power optimizer system and a micro inverter system. The DC and AC performance ratio (PR) of the systems have been analyzed for different weather types based on the clearness index. A pole shading covering 1–2% of the total system surface has been used to evaluate system performance under a specific type of partial shading. Module Level Power Electronics (MLPE) is capable of increasing the PR up to 35% under certain partial shading conditions. However, the string inverter system outperformed MLPE under unshaded operation conditions.

[1]  L. E. Norum,et al.  Overirradiance (Cloud Enhancement) Events at High Latitudes , 2012, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[2]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Partial shadowing of photovoltaic arrays with different system configurations: literature review and field test results , 2003 .

[3]  Marco Liserre,et al.  A Performance Comparison of High-Efficiency Transformer-Less PV Inverters , 2012 .

[4]  Pablo Sanchis,et al.  On the testing, characterization, and evaluation of PV inverters and dynamic MPPT performance under real varying operating conditions , 2007 .

[5]  M. Vitelli,et al.  Energy efficiency effective design of DC/DC converters for DMPPT PV applications , 2009, 2009 35th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics.

[6]  Chris Deline,et al.  Partially shaded operation of a grid-tied PV system , 2009, 2009 34th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC).

[7]  H. Suehrcke,et al.  Diffuse fraction correlations , 1991 .

[8]  Marin-Leonard Florea,et al.  Modeling photovoltaic arrays with MPPT Perturb & Observe algorithm , 2013, 2013 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED TOPICS IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ATEE).

[9]  K. Sinapis,et al.  MLPM Benchmark Report 2013 , 2013 .

[10]  Björn Müller,et al.  Performance Ratio Revisited: Are PR >90% Realistic? , 2011 .

[11]  Chris Deline,et al.  Photovoltaic Shading Testbed for Module-Level Power Electronics: 2014 Update , 2014 .

[12]  Binod Prasad Koirala,et al.  Study on MPP Mismatch Losses in Photovoltaic Applications , 2009 .

[13]  Christian Reise,et al.  Performance ratio revisited: is PR > 90% realistic? , 2011 .

[14]  Aissa Chouder,et al.  Study of bypass diodes configuration on PV modules , 2009 .

[15]  F. Kaeser Haeberlin Results of Recent Performance and Reliability Tests of the Most Popular Inverters for Grid Connected PV Systems in Switzerland , 2003 .

[16]  O. Trescases,et al.  A General Approach for Quantifying the Benefit of Distributed Power Electronics for Fine Grained MPPT in Photovoltaic Applications Using 3-D Modeling , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.