A method and tool for ‘cradle to grave’ embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350 standards

As operational impacts from buildings are reduced, embodied impacts are increasing. However, the latter are seldom calculated in the UK; when they are, they tend to be calculated after the building has been constructed, or are underestimated by considering only the initial materials stage. In 2010, the UK Government recommended that a standard methodology for calculating embodied impacts of buildings be developed for early stage design decisions. This was followed in 2011–12 by the publication of the European TC350 standards defining the ‘cradle to grave’ impact of buildings and products through a process Life Cycle Analysis. This paper describes a new whole life embodied carbon and energy of buildings (ECEB) tool, designed as a usable empirical-based approach for early stage design decisions for UK buildings. The tool complies where possible with the TC350 standards. Initial results for a simple masonry construction dwelling are given in terms of the percentage contribution of each life cycle stage. The main difficulty in obtaining these results is found to be the lack of data, and the paper suggests that the construction and manufacturing industries now have a responsibility to develop new data in order to support this task.

[1]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[2]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  A comparative review of existing data and methodologies for calculating embodied energy and carbon of buildings , 2012 .

[3]  Katie Symons,et al.  An Application of the CEN/TC350 standards to an Energy and Carbon LCA of timber used in construction, and the effect of end-of-life scenarios , 2013 .

[4]  R. Crawford Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Adolf Acquaye,et al.  Stochastic hybrid embodied CO 2-eq analysis: An application to the Irish apartment building sector , 2011 .

[6]  S. Citherlet,et al.  Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a family house during its whole life span , 2007 .

[7]  A Craighill,et al.  A lifecycle assessment and evaluation of construction and demolition waste , 1999 .

[8]  Geoffrey P. Hammond,et al.  Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials , 2008 .

[9]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[10]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[11]  Abbas Elmualim,et al.  A case study to investigate the life cycle carbon emissions and carbon storage capacity of a cross laminated timber, multi-storey residential building , 2013 .

[12]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[13]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .

[14]  Kristel de Myttenaere,et al.  Towards a comprehensive life cycle energy analysis framework for residential buildings , 2012 .

[15]  Robert Ries,et al.  The embodied energy and emissions of a high-rise education building: A quantification using process-based hybrid life cycle inventory model , 2012 .

[16]  Bill Addis,et al.  Embodied carbon dioxide as a design tool – a case study , 2011 .

[17]  John S. Monahan,et al.  An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study us , 2011 .