Characterization of a CCD-based digital x-ray imaging system for small-animal studies: properties of spatial resolution.

A digital x-ray imaging system was designed for small-animal studies. This system is a fiber-optics taper-coupled imaging system with two CCD arrays uniquely jointed. The x-ray source of the system has a small focal spot of 20 microm. This digital imaging system contains specially designed shelves to provide magnification levels, ranging from 1.5x to 5x. The system is characterized in terms of its properties of spatial resolution. An observer-based spatial resolution measurement was conducted with a line-pair target and a sector test pattern. The modulation transfer function of the system, with different magnifications, was studied by use of a 10-microm lead slit. The average resolutions at 50% and 5% modulations at 1x magnification were measured as 3.9 and 8.4 lp/mm, respectively, where lp indicates line pairs. With 5x magnification, the 50% and the 5% modulations provided 13.2- and 29.9-lp/mm, respectively, average spatial resolutions. The measurements showed consistency between the two individual CCD arrays; the difference in resolution between the two CCDs is less than 1%, even at high magnifications.

[1]  C E Metz,et al.  Transfer function analysis of radiographic imaging systems. , 1979, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  J M Boone,et al.  Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography. , 2001, Medical physics.

[3]  W.E. Higgins,et al.  Extraction of the hepatic vasculature in rats using 3-D micro-CT images , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  K Araki,et al.  An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution. , 2000, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[5]  W. McDavid,et al.  A simple method for measuring MTF in direct digital intraoral radiography. Technical note. , 1994, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[6]  Kunio Doi,et al.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[7]  L L Fajardo,et al.  Adaptive image interpolation for full-field digital x-ray mammography. , 1999, Applied optics.

[8]  J A Seibert,et al.  Sinusoidal modulation analysis for optical system MTF measurements. , 1996, Medical physics.

[9]  T Brinker,et al.  Direct magnification technique for cerebral angiography in the rat. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[10]  A. Farman,et al.  Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems. , 2000, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[11]  D Babot,et al.  A comparison of the ball, wire, edge, and bar/space pattern techniques for modulation transfer function measurements of linear x-ray detectors. , 1996, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[12]  C B Caldwell,et al.  Development of an anthropomorphic breast phantom. , 1990, Medical physics.

[13]  K. Karila.  Quality control of mammographic equipment: a 5-year follow-up. , 1988, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system. , 2000, Medical physics.

[15]  J Law.  The influence of focal spot size on image resolution and test phantom scores in mammography. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  K Doi,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. I. Modulation transfer function. , 1984, Medical physics.

[17]  B Geiger,et al.  Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[18]  C E Ravin,et al.  Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[19]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[20]  H Schiabel,et al.  The modulation transfer function. A simplified procedure for computer-aided quality evaluation in mammography. , 1997, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[21]  G. Boreman.  Modulation Transfer Function , 1998 .

[22]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray detectors for digital radiography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  G Wang,et al.  Design of a dual CCD configuration to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. , 2000, Medical physics.

[24]  G T Barnes,et al.  A method to measure the MTF of digital x-ray systems. , 1984, Medical physics.

[25]  E. Samei,et al.  Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems. , 1999, Medical physics.

[26]  D. Holdsworth,et al.  Rapid Small‐Animal Dual‐Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry Using Digital Radiography , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  J A Seibert,et al.  Scintillating fiber optic screens: a comparison of MTF, light conversion efficiency, and emission angle with Gd2O2S:Tb screens. , 1997, Medical physics.