Interactive Curvilinear Reformatting in Native Space

Curvilinear reformatting of 3D magnetic resonance imaging data has been recognized by the medical community as a helpful noninvasive tool for displaying the cerebral anatomy. It consists of automatically creating, with respect to a reference surface, a series of equidistant curvilinear slices at progressively deeper cuts. In comparison with planar slices, it allows more precise localization of lesions and identification of subtle structural abnormalities. However, current curvilinear reformatting tools either rely on the time-consuming manual delineation of guiding curves on 2D slices, or require costly automatic brain segmentation procedures. In addition, they extract the skin and skull, impeding a precise topographic correlation between the location of the brain lesion and skin surface. This impairs planning of craniotomy for neurosurgery, and of the appropriate implantation of electrodes for intracranial electroencephalography in presurgical evaluation. In this work, we present a novel approach based on direct manipulation of the visualized volume data. By using a 3D painting metaphor, the reference surface can be defined incrementally, according to the principle that the user interacts with what she/he sees. As a response, an animation of the reformatting process is displayed. The focus of this paper is a new volume tagging algorithm behind user interactions. It works at an interactive frame rate on current graphics hardware.

[1]  福山 秀直,et al.  SPM(statistical parametric mapping)の概要とその応用 (特集:核医学の新潮流) , 1998 .

[2]  Andreas Kolb,et al.  Opacity Peeling for Direct Volume Rendering , 2006, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[3]  Harlen Costa Batagelo,et al.  A framework for GPU-based application-independent 3D interactions , 2008, The Visual Computer.

[4]  F Cendes,et al.  Diagnosis of subtle focal dysplastic lesions: Curvilinear reformatting from three‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[5]  Markus Hadwiger,et al.  High-Quality Multimodal Volume Rendering for Preoperative Planning of Neurosurgical Interventions , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  DiFi: Fast 3D Distance Field Computation Using Graphics Hardware , 2004, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[7]  Harlen Costa Batagelo,et al.  Picking and snapping for 3D input devices , 2003, 16th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing (SIBGRAPI 2003).

[8]  R P Velthuizen,et al.  MRI segmentation: methods and applications. , 1995, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  Martin Kraus,et al.  GPU-based Real-time Discrete Euclidean Distance Transforms with Precise Error Bounds , 2009, VISAPP.

[10]  Harlen Costa Batagelo,et al.  What you see is what you snap: snapping to geometry deformed on the GPU , 2005, I3D '05.

[11]  Kai Bürger,et al.  Direct Volume Editing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Mario Costa Sousa,et al.  GPU-based point radiation for interactive volume sculpting and segmentation , 2008, The Visual Computer.

[13]  J. Spreer,et al.  Visualization of subdural strip and grid electrodes using curvilinear reformatting of 3D MR imaging data sets. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  John F. Hughes,et al.  Sculpting: an interactive volumetric modeling technique , 1991, SIGGRAPH.

[15]  Simon Stegmaier,et al.  A simple and flexible volume rendering framework for graphics-hardware-based raycasting , 2005, Fourth International Workshop on Volume Graphics, 2005..

[16]  Marc Levoy,et al.  A volumetric method for building complex models from range images , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[17]  Markus Hadwiger,et al.  Real-time volume graphics , 2006, Eurographics.

[18]  Filippo Tampieri Newell's method for Computing the plane equation of a Polygon , 1992, Graphics Gems III.

[19]  Jan Kassubek,et al.  Automatic curvilinear reformatting of three-dimensional MRI data of the cerebral cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[20]  Al Bartolucci,et al.  Functional imaging: I. Relative predictive value of intracranial electroencephalography , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[21]  A. Palmini,et al.  Terminology and classification of the cortical dysplasias , 2004, Neurology.

[22]  Thomas Ertl,et al.  Interactive Clipping Techniques for Texture-Based Volume Visualization and Volume Shading , 2003, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[23]  Luciana Porcher Nedel,et al.  Erasing, digging and clipping in volumetric datasets with one or two hands , 2006, VRCIA '06.

[24]  Martti Mäntylä,et al.  Introduction to Solid Modeling , 1988 .

[25]  M. Duchowny,et al.  Epilepsy surgery in patients with normal or nonfocal MRI scans: Integrative strategies offer long‐term seizure relief , 2008, Epilepsia.

[26]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  Signed distance transform using graphics hardware , 2003, IEEE Visualization, 2003. VIS 2003..

[27]  Shuangshuang Jin,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for vertex normal computation , 2005, The Visual Computer.

[28]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[29]  Alexandre X. Falcão,et al.  Fast and automatic curvilinear reformatting of MR images of the brain for diagnosis of dysplastic lesions , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[30]  Hayong Shin,et al.  Self-intersection Removal in Triangular Mesh Offsetting , 2003 .