Facilitating and Constraining Factors on Autonomy

This article describes a model “changing autonomy” which was developed in a grounded theory study among stroke patients on admission into nursing homes for rehabilitation. Three dimensions of autonomy were identified: self-determination, independence, and self-care. On admission, patients’ conditions (disabilities, multimorbidity, emotional state, and feeling like a layperson) and patients’ strategies (waiting and seeing, and acting as a subordinate) constrain autonomy. Several environmental factors facilitate patient autonomy. The nursing home sustains patient autonomy by providing a hopeful atmosphere and room for autonomy. The health professionals facilitate autonomy by giving therapy, support and information, attentiveness and respect, paternalism and teamwork. Facilitating strategies of the family encompass emotional and instrumental support. Care routines, lack of privacy, an unfamiliar environment, waiting periods, boredom, and lack of information were identified as constraining environmental factors. Developing guidelines and multidisciplinary courses regarding the approach to patient autonomy on admission is recommended.

[1]  Dorothea E. Orem,et al.  Nursing: Concepts of practice , 1972 .

[2]  N. Denzin The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological , 1972 .

[3]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[4]  T. Beauchamp,et al.  Principles of biomedical ethics , 1991 .

[5]  B L Miller,et al.  Autonomy & the refusal of lifesaving treatment. , 1981, The Hastings Center report.

[6]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[7]  Charles Taylor,et al.  The malaise of modernity , 1991 .

[8]  D. Wade,et al.  Stroke: rehabilitation and long-term care , 1992, The Lancet.

[9]  Robert Anderson,et al.  The Aftermath of Stroke : Index , 1992 .

[10]  Gordon,et al.  Advances in Stroke Rehabilitation , 1993 .

[11]  C. Cummings Ethical issues in staff development. , 1993, Nursing staff development insider.

[12]  Jill P. Pell,et al.  The Aftermath of Stroke. The experience of patients and their families , 1993 .

[13]  G. Agich Autonomy and long term care , 1993 .

[14]  J. Habbema,et al.  Costs of medical care after first-ever stroke in The Netherlands. , 1995, Stroke.

[15]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Stroke patients' views on their admission to hospital , 1995, BMJ.

[16]  C. Campen,et al.  Kwaliteit van leven van somatische verpleeghuispatiënten: een begripsverheldering en overzicht van meetinstrumenten. , 1995 .

[17]  Celia Wolf-Devine,et al.  Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care , 1995 .

[18]  J. Huisman The Netherlands , 1996, The Lancet.

[19]  C. Campen,et al.  Ervaren autonomie en ervaren veiligheid bij somatische verpleeghuisbewoners. , 1996 .

[20]  L. Andersson,et al.  Quality of nursing home care assessed by competent nursing home patients. , 1997, Journal of advanced nursing.

[21]  M. Nolan,et al.  Stroke. 1: A paradigm case in nursing rehabilitation. , 1998, British journal of nursing.

[22]  K Sharp,et al.  A critical appraisal of the role of triangulation in nursing research. , 1998, International journal of nursing studies.

[23]  H. I. Loor [Quality of life: CVA patients take stock]. , 1998, Tijdschrift voor gerontologie en geriatrie.

[24]  H. Abu‐Saad,et al.  Autonomy in the rehabilitation of stroke patients in nursing homes. A concept analysis. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.