A Role for Rebinding in Rapid and Reliable T Cell Responses to Antigen

Experimental work has shown that T cells of the immune system rapidly and specifically respond to antigenic molecules presented on the surface of antigen-presenting-cells and are able to discriminate between potential stimuli based on the kinetic parameters of the T cell receptor-antigen bond. These antigenic molecules are presented among thousands of chemically similar endogenous peptides, raising the question of how T cells can reliably make a decision to respond to certain antigens but not others within minutes of encountering an antigen presenting cell. In this theoretical study, we investigate the role of localized rebinding between a T cell receptor and an antigen. We show that by allowing the signaling state of individual receptors to persist during brief unbinding events, T cells are able to discriminate antigens based on both their unbinding and rebinding rates. We demonstrate that T cell receptor coreceptors, but not receptor clustering, are important in promoting localized rebinding, and show that requiring rebinding for productive signaling reduces signals from a high concentration of endogenous pMHC. In developing our main results, we use a relatively simple model based on kinetic proofreading. However, we additionally show that all our results are recapitulated when we use a detailed T cell receptor signaling model. We discuss our results in the context of existing models and recent experimental work and propose new experiments to test our findings.

[1]  T. Zal,et al.  Altered peptide ligands induce delayed CD8-T cell receptor interaction--a role for CD8 in distinguishing antigen quality. , 2006, Immunity.

[2]  Horst Vogel,et al.  CD8 kinetically promotes ligand binding to the T-cell antigen receptor. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[3]  Zhengyu Ma,et al.  Surface-Anchored Monomeric Agonist pMHCs Alone Trigger TCR with High Sensitivity , 2008, PLoS biology.

[4]  Ronald N Germain,et al.  Modeling T Cell Antigen Discrimination Based on Feedback Control of Digital ERK Responses , 2005, PLoS biology.

[5]  S. Dzik,et al.  The immunological synapse: A molecular machine controlling T cell activation , 2000 .

[6]  Rajat Varma,et al.  TCR Triggering by the pMHC Complex: Valency, Affinity, and Dynamics , 2008, Science Signaling.

[7]  M. Davis,et al.  Altered T cell receptor ligands trigger a subset of early T cell signals. , 1996, Immunity.

[8]  James R Faeder,et al.  Rule-based modeling of biochemical systems with BioNetGen. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[9]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Measuring diffusion and binding kinetics by contact area FRAP. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Nigel J Burroughs,et al.  Ligand detection and discrimination by spatial relocalization: A kinase-phosphatase segregation model of TCR activation. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Simon J Davis,et al.  The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[12]  Rajat Varma,et al.  T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. , 2006, Immunity.

[13]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  Analysis of serial engagement and peptide-MHC transport in T cell receptor microclusters. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Marc Bonneville,et al.  Kinetic evidence for a ligand-binding-induced conformational transition in the T cell receptor , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Cytoskeletal polarization and redistribution of cell-surface molecules during T cell antigen recognition. , 2000, Seminars in immunology.

[16]  Tetsuo Yamazaki,et al.  T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  B K Jakobsen,et al.  T cell receptor and coreceptor CD8 alphaalpha bind peptide-MHC independently and with distinct kinetics. , 1999, Immunity.

[18]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes , 1995, Nature.

[19]  Ofer Feinerman,et al.  Quantitative challenges in understanding ligand discrimination by alphabeta T cells. , 2008, Molecular immunology.

[20]  O. Acuto,et al.  Syk and ZAP-70 mediate recruitment of p56lck/CD4 to the activated T cell receptor/CD3/zeta complex , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[21]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Mark M Davis,et al.  T cell killing does not require the formation of a stable mature immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[23]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[24]  M. Davis,et al.  Differential clustering of CD4 and CD3zeta during T cell recognition. , 2000, Science.

[25]  Michael Loran Dustin Stop and go traffic to tune T cell responses. , 2004, Immunity.

[26]  Alexis M. Kalergis,et al.  Efficient T cell activation requires an optimal dwell-time of interaction between the TCR and the pMHC complex , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[27]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  Supplementary information for Activated TCRs remain marked for internalization after dissociation from pMHC , 2022 .

[28]  A. Szabó,et al.  Role of diffusion in ligand binding to macromolecules and cell-bound receptors. , 1982, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[30]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Single-particle tracking: applications to membrane dynamics. , 1997, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[31]  M R Jackson,et al.  Requirements for stimulating naive CD8+ T cells via signal 1 alone. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[32]  Christoph Wülfing,et al.  Costimulation and endogenous MHC ligands contribute to T cell recognition , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[33]  J. Stark,et al.  Understanding specificity and sensitivity of T-cell recognition. , 2005, Trends in immunology.

[34]  H. Eisen,et al.  Evidence that a single peptide-MHC complex on a target cell can elicit a cytolytic T cell response. , 1996, Immunity.

[35]  J. Goldman,et al.  B Cell Ligand Discrimination Through a Spreading and Contraction Response , 2006, Science.

[36]  Jean-Manuel Segura,et al.  Increased Mobility of Major Histocompatibility Complex I-Peptide Complexes Decreases the Sensitivity of Antigen Recognition* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  David M Kranz,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the contribution of TCR/pepMHC affinity and CD8 to T cell activation. , 2003, Immunity.

[38]  M. Seminario,et al.  Signal initiation in T‐cell receptor microclusters , 2008, Immunological reviews.

[39]  B. Goldstein,et al.  Calculations show substantial serial engagement of T cell receptors. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[40]  P. Allen,et al.  Separation of IL-4 production from Th cell proliferation by an altered T cell receptor ligand. , 1991, Science.

[41]  Mark M Davis,et al.  A role for "self" in T-cell activation. , 2007, Seminars in immunology.

[42]  Raibatak Das,et al.  Analysis of membrane-localized binding kinetics with FRAP , 2008, European Biophysics Journal.

[43]  Robert Maile,et al.  CD8+ T Cell Activation Is Governed by TCR-Peptide/MHC Affinity, Not Dissociation Rate1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[44]  M. Streuli,et al.  Specific interaction of the CD45 protein-tyrosine phosphatase with tyrosine-phosphorylated CD3 zeta chain. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Cliburn Chan,et al.  Feedback control of T–cell receptor activation , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Evidence that structural rearrangements and/or flexibility during TCR binding can contribute to T cell activation. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[47]  Rajat Varma,et al.  Actin and agonist MHC–peptide complex–dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[48]  D A Rand,et al.  A reliable and safe T cell repertoire based on low-affinity T cell receptors. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  Margot Thome,et al.  The p56lck SH2 domain mediates recruitment of CD8/p56lck to the activated T cell receptor/CD3/ζ complex , 1996, European journal of immunology.

[50]  Jennifer A. McWilliams,et al.  Relating TCR-peptide-MHC affinity to immunogenicity for the design of tumor vaccines. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[51]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Kinetics of MHC-CD8 Interaction at the T Cell Membrane1 , 2007, Journal of Immunology.

[52]  Samuel A. Isaacson,et al.  Incorporating Diffusion in Complex Geometries into Stochastic Chemical Kinetics Simulations , 2006, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[53]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  Analysis of peptide/MHC-induced TCR downregulation , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[54]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Receptors: Models for Binding, Trafficking, and Signaling , 1993 .

[55]  Cliburn Chan,et al.  Cooperative enhancement of specificity in a lattice of T cell receptors , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  Takashi Saito,et al.  Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76 , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[57]  Ofer Feinerman,et al.  Quantitative challenges in understanding ligand discrimination by αβ T cells , 2008 .

[58]  Ellis L. Reinherz,et al.  T Cell Receptor Binding to a pMHCII Ligand Is Kinetically Distinct from and Independent of CD4* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[59]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[60]  Jayajit Das,et al.  The stimulatory potency of T cell antigens is influenced by the formation of the immunological synapse. , 2007, Immunity.

[61]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  T cell receptor binding kinetics required for T cell activation depend on the density of cognate ligand on the antigen-presenting cell. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  P. A. van der Merwe,et al.  Molecular mechanisms involved in T cell receptor triggering. , 2007, Seminars in immunology.

[63]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Analysis of two-dimensional dissociation constant of laterally mobile cell adhesion molecules. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[64]  Morgan Huse,et al.  Agonist/endogenous peptide–MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity , 2005, Nature.

[65]  James R Faeder,et al.  Stochastic effects and bistability in T cell receptor signaling. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.