Challenges for Ubicomp Evaluation

Technology in different forms is available ubiquitously through much of the world. The study of Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp) is concerned with enabling a future in which the most useful applications of such technology are feasible to build, and pleasing to use. But what is useful? What is usable? What do people actually need? These questions are only beginning to be answered partly because Ubicomp systems are more difficult to evaluate, particularly at the early stages of design, than desktop applications. This difficulty is due to issues like scale and ambiguity, and a tendency to apply Ubicomp in ongoing, daily life settings unlike task and work oriented desktop systems. This paper presents a case study of three Ubicomp systems that were evaluated at multiple stages of their design. In each case, we briefly describe the application and evaluation, and then present a set of lessons that we learned regarding the evaluation techniques we used. Our goal is to better understand how evaluation techniques need to evolve for the Ubicomp domain. Based on the lessons that we learned, we suggest four challenges for

[1]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays , 2003, CHI '03.

[2]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[3]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Designing audio aura , 1998, CHI.

[4]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[5]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Tailorable domain objects as meeting tools for an electronic whiteboard , 1998, CSCW '98.

[6]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Evaluating Animation in the Periphery as a Mechanism for Maintaining Awarness , 2001, INTERACT.

[7]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Establishing tradeoffs that leverage attention for utility: empirically evaluating information display in notification systems , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A comparison of usage evaluation and inspection methods for assessing groupware usability , 2001, GROUP.

[9]  James A. Landay,et al.  Ubiquitous computing for firefighters: field studies and prototypes of large displays for incident command , 2004, CHI '04.

[10]  Tom White,et al.  An interactive poetic garden , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[11]  David R. Millen,et al.  Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research , 2000, DIS '00.

[12]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance , 2001, INTERACT.

[13]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Tradeoffs in displaying peripheral information , 2000, CHI.

[14]  W. Andrew,et al.  LO, and A. , 1988 .

[15]  Thomas W. Calvert,et al.  Moving Icons: Detection and Distraction , 2001, INTERACT.

[16]  A. Venkatesh,et al.  The Home of the Future: an Ethnographic Study of New Information Technologies in the Home , 2001 .

[17]  Arne Jönsson,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies: why and how , 1993, IUI '93.

[18]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[19]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Ambient Displays: Turning Architectural Space into an Interface between People and Digital Information , 1998, CoBuild.

[20]  Scott Carter,et al.  The design of hebb , a peripheral system supporting awareness and communication , and a study of its impact on small , distributed groups , 2004 .

[21]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Presiding over accidents: system direction of human action , 2004, CHI.

[22]  Anoop K. Sinha,et al.  Embarking on multimodal interface design , 2002, Proceedings. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces.

[23]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[24]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  The Human Experience , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[25]  Gary Hsieh,et al.  Using Low-Cost Sensing to Support Nutritional Awareness , 2002, UbiComp.

[26]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Distributed mediation of ambiguous context in aware environments , 2002, UIST '02.

[27]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  Time Aura: interfaces for pacing , 2001, CHI.

[28]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Multimodal system processing in mobile environments , 2000, UIST '00.

[29]  D. Scott McCrickard,et al.  Attuning notification design to user goals and attention costs , 2003, Commun. ACM.

[30]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Report from Ubicomp 2001 workshop: evaluation methodologies for ubiquitous computing , 2002, CHIB.

[31]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Multimodal interfaces for dynamic interactive maps , 1996, CHI.

[32]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Building a digital library of captured educational experiences , 2000, Proceedings 2000 Kyoto International Conference on Digital Libraries: Research and Practice.

[33]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Pinwheels: visualizing information flow in an architectural space , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[34]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study , 2003, CHI '03.

[35]  John C. Rondoni,et al.  Context-Aware Experience Sampling for the Design and Study of Ubiquitous Technologies , 2003 .

[36]  J. Bardram Hospitals of the Future – Ubiquitous Computing support for Medical Work in Hospitals , 2003 .

[37]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[38]  Xiaoyi Ma,et al.  Eliciting user preferences using image-based experience sampling and reflection , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[39]  Anoop K. Sinha,et al.  Multimodal theater: extending low fidelity paper prototyping to multimodal applications , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[40]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Classroom 2000: An Experiment with the Instrumentation of a Living Educational Environment , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[41]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A review of groupware evaluations , 2000, Proceedings IEEE 9th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000).

[42]  Sunny Consolvo,et al.  User Study Techniques in the Design and Evaluation of a Ubicomp Environment , 2002, UbiComp.

[43]  Ian Smith,et al.  Informing the design of an information management system with iterative fieldwork , 2000, DIS '00.

[44]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Scope: providing awareness of multiple notifications at a glance , 2002, AVI '02.

[45]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Building Bridges from Theory to Practice , 2001 .

[46]  Susan E. Hankinson,et al.  Healthy women, healthy lives : a guide to preventing disease from the landmark Nurses' Health Study , 2001 .

[47]  Peter Khooshabeh,et al.  Paper or interactive?: a study of prototyping techniques for ubiquitous computing environments , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[48]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  A survey of user-centered design practice , 2002, CHI.

[49]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Living laboratories: the future computing environments group at the Georgia Institute of Technology , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[50]  Steve Benford,et al.  Finding a Place for UbiComp in the Home , 2003, UbiComp.

[51]  A. Mokdad,et al.  The spread of the obesity epidemic in the United States, 1991-1998. , 1999, JAMA.

[52]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems , 1994, CSCW '94.

[53]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  LumiTouch: an emotional communication device , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[54]  Michael J. Muller Retrospective on a year of participatory design using the PICTIVE technique , 1992, CHI.

[55]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[56]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[57]  Jonathan Trevor,et al.  Issues in Personalizing Shared Ubiquitous Devices , 2002, UbiComp.

[58]  Richard Beckwith,et al.  Designing for Ubiquity: The Perception of Privacy , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[59]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members , 2001, CHI.

[60]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Towards a Discipline for Evaluating Ubiquitous Computing Applications [Technical Report] , 2004 .

[61]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Comparing paper and tangible, multimodal tools , 2002, CHI.

[62]  Alain Karsenty,et al.  Unremarkable computing , 2002, CHI.

[63]  Stephen S. Intille,et al.  Change Blind Information Display for Ubiquitous Computing Environments , 2002, UbiComp.

[64]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  The information percolator: ambient information display in a decorative object , 1999, UIST '99.

[65]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers , 2002, CHI.

[66]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[67]  Bill N. Schilit,et al.  Supporting knowledge workers beyond the desktop with Palplates , 1997, CHI.

[68]  Jason Hong,et al.  Towards Everyday Privacy for Ubiquitous Computing , 2003 .