HSCT configuration design using response surface approximations of supersonic Euler aerodynamics

A method has been developed to efficiently implement supersonic aerodynamic predictions from Euler solutions into a highly constrained, multidisciplinary design optimization of a High-Speed Civil Transport (HSCT) configuration. The method alleviates the large computational burden associated with performing CFD analyses and eliminates the numerical noise present in the analyses through the use of response surface (RS) methodologies, a variation of the variable-complexity modeling (VCM) technique, and coarse grained parallel computing. Variablecomplexity modeling techniques allow one to take advantage of information gained from inexpensive lower fidelity models while maintaining the accuracy of the more expensive high fidelity methods. In this research, simple conceptual level aerodynamic models provide the functional form of the drag polar. Response surface models are therefore created for the intervening functions (drag polar shape parameters) revealed by the simple models instead of for the drag itself. Optimization results using linear theory RS models are used to select the allowable ranges of the design variables. Stepwise regression analysis, performed using data from linear theory aerodynamic results, provides information on the relative importance of each term in the polynomial RS models. With this information, reduced term RS models representing a correction to the linear theory RS model predictions are constructed using fewer Euler evaluations. Studies into five, ten, fifteen, and ∗Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering. Current Position: Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Member AIAA. †Postdoctoral Research Associate, National Research Council/NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, Member AIAA. ‡Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Student Member AIAA. §Professor and Dept. Head of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Associate Fellow AIAA. ¶Professor of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Associate Fellow AIAA. ‖Professor of Aerospace Engineering, Mechanics and Engineering Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, Fellow AIAA ∗∗Professor of Computer Science and Mathematics twenty variable HSCT design problems show that accurate results can be obtained with the reduced term models at a fraction of the cost of creating the full term quadratic RS models. Specifically, 11 hour, 47 hour, 115 hour, and 255 hour savings in CPU time on a single 75 MHz IP21 processor of a SGI Power Challenge are obtained for the five, ten, fifteen, and twenty variable design problems, respectively. Errors in the RS model cruise drag predictions, based on actual Euler calculations, for the optimal designs range from 0.1 counts to 0.8 counts for the twenty variable optimum.

[1]  L. A. Mccullers Aircraft configuration optimization including optimized flight profiles , 1984 .

[2]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Variable-complexity response surface aerodynamic design of an HSCT wing , 1995 .

[3]  M. J. Box,et al.  Factorial Designs, the |X′X| Criterion, and Some Related Matters , 1971 .

[4]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Variable-complexity aerodynamic optimization of a high-speed civil transport wing , 1994 .

[5]  S. A. Powers,et al.  Drag minimization using exact methods , 1964 .

[6]  Leland M. Nicolai Fundamentals of Aircraft Design , 1984 .

[7]  L Barger Raymond,et al.  Automatic Computation of Euler-Marching and Subsonic Grids for Wing-Fuselage Configurations , 1994 .

[8]  Duane L. Knill,et al.  Implementing Aerodynamic Predictions from Computational Fluid Dynamics in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a High-Speed Civil Transport , 1997 .

[9]  E. Hopkins,et al.  An evaluation of theories for predicting turbulent skin friction and heat transfer on flat plates at supersonic and hypersonic Mach numbers , 1971 .

[10]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Accuracy of Aerodynamic Pre-dictions and its E ects on Supersonic Transport Design , 1996 .

[11]  R. J. Mack,et al.  Estimation of leading-edge thrust for supersonic wings of arbitrary planform , 1978 .

[12]  Shirley Dex,et al.  JR 旅客販売総合システム(マルス)における運用及び管理について , 1991 .

[13]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[14]  C. B. Craidon Description of a digital computer program for airplane configuration plots , 1970 .

[15]  Kroo Ilan,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization Methods for Aircraft Preliminary Design , 1994 .

[16]  P. Macdonald Factorial Designs , 1982 .

[17]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Response surface approximations for discipline coordination in multidisciplinary design optimization , 1996 .

[18]  Harry W. Carlson,et al.  Numerical methods and a computer program for subsonic and supersonic aerodynamic design and analysis of wings with attainable thrust considerations , 1984 .

[19]  R. Mead,et al.  The Design of Experiments. , 1989 .

[20]  Jae-Moon Lee,et al.  A NEW APPROACH TO INTEGRATED WING DESIGN IN CONCEPTUAL SYNTHESIS AND OPTIMIZATION , 1996 .

[21]  R. L. Barger,et al.  Automatic computation of wing-fuselage intersection lines and fillet inserts with fixed-area constraint , 1993 .

[22]  J. I The Design of Experiments , 1936, Nature.

[23]  Layne T. Watson,et al.  Dependence of optimal structural weight on aerodynamic shape for a High Speed Civil Transport , 1996 .

[24]  R. Haftka,et al.  Variable-Complexity Interlacing of Weight Equation and Structural Optimization for the Design of the , 1994 .

[25]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Mul-tidisciplinary Optimization of the High-Speed Civil Transport , 1995 .

[26]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Combined Aerodynamic and Structural Optimization of a High-Speed Civil Transport Wing , 1995 .

[27]  Oleg Golovidov Variable-Complexity Approximations for Aerodynamic Parameters in Hsct Optimization , 1997 .

[28]  H. W. Carlson,et al.  Numerical methods for the design and analysis of wings at supersonic speeds , 1974 .

[29]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization - Survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[30]  T Watson Layne,et al.  Wing Design for a High-Speed Civil Transport Using a Design of Experiments Methodology , 1996 .

[31]  B. Grossman,et al.  Variable-complexity response surface approximations for wing structural weight in HSCT design , 1996 .

[32]  Vladimir Olegovich Balabanov,et al.  Development of Approximations for HSCT Wing Bending Material Weight using Response Surface Methodology , 1997 .

[33]  T Watson Layne,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Supersonic Transport Using Design of Experiments Theory and Response Surface Modeling , 1997 .

[34]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Construction of response surfaces for design optimization applications , 1996 .

[35]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Aerodynamic optimization of an HSCT configuration using variable-complexity modeling , 1993 .

[36]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Response surface based, concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary system design , 1996 .

[37]  Toby J. Mitchell,et al.  An Algorithm for the Construction of “D-Optimal” Experimental Designs , 2000, Technometrics.

[38]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Statistical Experimentation Methods for Achieving Affordable Concurrent Systems Design , 1997 .