Decision Structuring and Robustness Analysis in Selecting Urban Transit Alternatives

Public policy makers have recognized the need to seek urban passenger transportation solutions in the domain of urban transit systems. In this article, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is proposed as a decision support methodology for evaluation of system choice, and an illustrative example is presented. The hierarchy reflects overall objectives of transit systems, which include achieving betterment in the urban transit picture and mitigating possible implementation impediments. On the betterment side, the transit system objectives considered in the hierarchy include appropriate level of service and performance, congestion reduction potential, support of economic development, and flexibility. On the other hand, transit system impediment factors comprise system cost, environmental impacts, and implementation and operation barriers. The article demonstrates the value of the proposed approach in decision structuring for selecting among urban transit alternatives and in providing the facility of analyzing the robustness of the decision with respect to various judgements that are made in the selection process.

[1]  Alan J Horowitz,et al.  METHODS AND STRATEGIES FOR TRANSIT BENEFIT MEASUREMENT , 1995 .

[2]  Roger Mackett,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR PLANNING A NEW URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM. , 1996 .

[3]  Roger Mackett DETERMINING APPROPRIATE PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM FOR A CITY , 1994 .

[4]  C. Jotin Khisty,et al.  Transportation Engineering: An Introduction , 1990 .

[5]  N Janarthanan,et al.  MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE TRANSIT SYSTEM DESIGNS , 1986 .

[6]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  Evaluation of Advanced Construction Technology with AHP Method , 1992 .

[7]  Chelsea C. White,et al.  APPLICATION OF MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY TO PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM DESIGN , 1994 .

[8]  S. Lioukas,et al.  Evaluating alternative scenarios for high-speed rail investment in Greece , 1992 .

[9]  Muhaad Danish Nisar,et al.  TRANSITWAY: AN INNOVATION IN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION , 1992 .

[10]  G. T. Johnson,et al.  REVIEW OF FINANCING OPTIONS FOR HIGHWAYS AND TRANSIT , 1987 .

[11]  T F Larwin SAN DIEGO'S LIGHT RAIL SYSTEM: A SUCCESS STORY. 1988 TRANSPORTATION ACHIEVEMENT AWARD (OPERATIONS) , 1989 .

[12]  Thomas E Parody,et al.  NET COSTS OF PEAK AND OFFPEAK TRANSIT TRIPS TAKEN NATIONWIDE BY MODE , 1990 .

[13]  P G Flachsbart EFFECTIVENESS OF PRIORITY LANES IN REDUCING TRAVEL TIME AND CARBON MONOXIDE EXPOSURE , 1989 .

[14]  H A Hazard CANADIAN TRANSIT HANDBOOK , 1980 .

[15]  William Bowlby,et al.  NOISE AND AIR POLLUTION OF HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEMS , 1989 .

[16]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING: A DECISION-ORIENTED APPROACH , 1984 .

[17]  P. Newman,et al.  Costs of Automobile Dependence: Global Survey of Cities , 1999 .