Modeling the Rise in Internet-based Petitions

Contemporary collective action, much of which involves social media and other Internet-based platforms, leaves a digital imprint which may be harvested to better understand the dynamics of mobilization. Petition signing is an example of collective action which has gained in popularity with rising use of social media and provides such data for the whole population of petition signatories for a given platform. This paper tracks the growth curves of all 20,000 petitions to the UK government over 18 months, analyzing the rate of growth and outreach mechanism. Previous research has suggested the importance of the first day to the ultimate success of a petition, but has not examined early growth within that day, made possible here through hourly resolution in the data. The analysis shows that the vast majority of petitions do not achieve any measure of success; over 99 percent fail to get the 10,000 signatures required for an official response and only 0.1 percent attain the 100,000 required for a parliamentary debate. We analyze the data through a multiplicative process model framework to explain the heterogeneous growth of signatures at the population level. We define and measure an average outreach factor for petitions and show that it decays very fast (reducing to 0.1% after 10 hours). After 24 hours, a petition's fate is virtually set. The findings seem to challenge conventional analyses of collective action from economics and political science, where the production function has been assumed to follow an S-shaped curve.

[1]  S. Wright Assessing (e-)Democratic Innovations: “Democratic Goods” and Downing Street E-Petitions , 2012 .

[2]  Wael Ghonim Revolution 2.0 : the power of the people is greater than the people in power : a memoir , 2012 .

[3]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  A simple generative model of collective online behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  N. Day,et al.  Political participation and democracy in Britain , 1992 .

[5]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network , 2011, Scientific reports.

[6]  David Lazer,et al.  #Bigbirds Never Die: Understanding Social Dynamics of Emergent Hashtags , 2013, ICWSM.

[7]  Peter John,et al.  How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  G. Marwell,et al.  The critical mass in collective action : a micro-social theory , 1993 .

[9]  Graham Smith Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation - Theories of Institutional Design , 2009 .

[10]  Jukka-Pekka Onnela,et al.  A Simple Generative Model of Collective Online Behaviour , 2014 .

[11]  A. Chadwick Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance , 2009 .

[12]  Stéphane Reissfelder,et al.  Leadership without Leaders? Starters and Followers in Online Collective Action , 2013, ArXiv.

[13]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Structural and Dynamical Patterns on Online Social Networks: The Spanish May 15th Movement as a Case Study , 2011, PloS one.

[14]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Collective Emotions Online , 2014 .

[15]  András Kornai,et al.  Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Summer Harlow,et al.  COLLECTIVE ACTION ON THE WEB , 2012 .

[17]  Jan-Hinrik Schmidt,et al.  On the Use of the E-Petition Platform of the German Bundestag , 2014 .

[18]  Fang Wu,et al.  Novelty and collective attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Gerardo Iñiguez,et al.  Modeling social dynamics in a collaborative environment , 2014, EPJ Data Science.

[21]  Petition Growth and Success Rates on the UK No. 10 Downing Street Website , 2013 .

[22]  Scott A. Hale,et al.  Petition growth and success rates on the UK No. 10 Downing Street website , 2013, WebSci.

[23]  Damon Centola Homophily, networks, and critical mass: Solving the start-up problem in large group collective action , 2013 .

[24]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Partisan asymmetries in online political activity , 2012, EPJ Data Science.

[25]  Ralf Lindner,et al.  Broadening Participation Through E‐Petitions? An Empirical Study of Petitions to the German Parliament , 2011 .

[26]  Stéphane Reissfelder,et al.  Social information and political participation on the internet: an experiment , 2011, European Political Science Review.

[27]  G. Marwell,et al.  The critical mass in collective action , 1993 .

[28]  T. Schelling Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[29]  Andreas Jungherr,et al.  The Political Click : Political Participation through E-Petitions in Germany , 2010 .

[30]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.