Automated mass spectrometry imaging of over 2000 proteins from tissue sections at 100-μm spatial resolution

Biological tissues exhibit complex spatial heterogeneity that directs the functions of multicellular organisms. Quantifying protein expression is essential for elucidating processes within complex biological assemblies. Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is a powerful emerging tool for mapping the spatial distribution of metabolites and lipids across tissue surfaces, but technical challenges have limited the application of IMS to the analysis of proteomes. Methods for probing the spatial distribution of the proteome have generally relied on the use of labels and/or antibodies, which limits multiplexing and requires a priori knowledge of protein targets. Past efforts to make spatially resolved proteome measurements across tissues have had limited spatial resolution and proteome coverage and have relied on manual workflows. Here, we demonstrate an automated approach to imaging that utilizes label-free nanoproteomics to analyze tissue voxels, generating quantitative cell-type-specific images for >2000 proteins with 100-µm spatial resolution across mouse uterine tissue sections preparing for blastocyst implantation. Imaging mass spectrometry is a powerful emerging tool for mapping the spatial distribution of biomolecules across tissue surfaces. Here the authors showcase an automated technology for deep proteome imaging that utilizes ultrasensitive microfluidics and a mass spectrometry workflow to analyze tissue voxels, generating quantitative cell-type-specific images.

[1]  James P. Carson,et al.  Spatially-Resolved Proteomics: Rapid Quantitative Analysis of Laser Capture Microdissected Alveolar Tissue Samples , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Paul D Piehowski,et al.  Subnanogram proteomics: impact of LC column selection, MS instrumentation and data analysis strategy on proteome coverage for trace samples. , 2017, International journal of mass spectrometry.

[3]  Vladislav A Petyuk,et al.  Spatial mapping of protein abundances in the mouse brain by voxelation integrated with high-throughput liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2007, Genome research.

[4]  H. Bradshaw,et al.  Uterine-specific p53 deficiency confers premature uterine senescence and promotes preterm birth in mice. , 2010, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[5]  Ryan Hafen,et al.  Trelliscope: A system for detailed visualization in the deep analysis of large complex data , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on Large-Scale Data Analysis and Visualization (LDAV).

[6]  R. Nusse,et al.  Purified Wnt5a Protein Activates or Inhibits β-Catenin–TCF Signaling Depending on Receptor Context , 2006, PLoS biology.

[7]  Joel G Pounds,et al.  A statistical selection strategy for normalization procedures in LC‐MS proteomics experiments through dataset‐dependent ranking of normalization scaling factors , 2011, Proteomics.

[8]  K. D. Duncan,et al.  Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Prostaglandins as Silver Ion Adducts with Nanospray Desorption Electrospray Ionization. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Sources of technical variability in quantitative LC-MS proteomics: human brain tissue sample analysis. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[10]  Richard M Caprioli,et al.  Imaging mass spectrometry reveals unique protein profiles during embryo implantation. , 2008, Endocrinology.

[11]  Terry P Yamaguchi,et al.  Appropriate crypt formation in the uterus for embryo homing and implantation requires Wnt5a-ROR signaling. , 2014, Cell reports.

[12]  Richard N. Zare,et al.  Imaging of Proteins in Tissue Samples Using Nanospray Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Joel G. Pounds,et al.  Combined Statistical Analyses of Peptide Intensities and Peptide Occurrences Improves Identification of Significant Peptides from MS-Based Proteomics Data , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[14]  Olga Vitek,et al.  Protein biomarkers on tissue as imaged via MALDI mass spectrometry: A systematic approach to study the limits of detection , 2016, Proteomics.

[15]  I. Fournier,et al.  On-tissue protein identification and imaging by MALDI-Ion mobility mass spectrometry , 2010, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[16]  A. Kannan,et al.  A Novel Pathway Involving Progesterone Receptor, 12/15-Lipoxygenase-derived Eicosanoids, and Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ Regulates Implantation in Mice* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Benjamin Balluff,et al.  Mass spectrometry imaging for clinical research - latest developments, applications, and current limitations. , 2017, The Analyst.

[18]  Markus R. Wenk,et al.  PI4P/phosphatidylserine countertransport at ORP5- and ORP8-mediated ER–plasma membrane contacts , 2015, Science.

[19]  Thomas O Metz,et al.  Characterizing the lipid and metabolite changes associated with placental function and pregnancy complications using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry and mass spectrometry imaging. , 2017, Placenta.

[20]  Richard M Caprioli,et al.  Spatial and temporal alterations of phospholipids determined by mass spectrometry during mouse embryo implantation[S] , 2009, Journal of Lipid Research.

[21]  Jeroen Krijgsveld,et al.  Ultrasensitive proteome analysis using paramagnetic bead technology , 2014, Molecular systems biology.

[22]  Tao Liu,et al.  Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-based Quantitative Proteomics* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  Heather Bradshaw,et al.  Combinatory approaches prevent preterm birth profoundly exacerbated by gene-environment interactions. , 2013, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[24]  Joel G. Pounds,et al.  Improved quality control processing of peptide-centric LC-MS proteomics data , 2011, Bioinform..

[25]  I. Fournier,et al.  MALDI imaging of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues: application to model animals of Parkinson disease for biomarker hunting. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[26]  Navdeep Jaitly,et al.  DAnTE: a statistical tool for quantitative analysis of -omics data , 2008, Bioinform..

[27]  M. Mann,et al.  Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[28]  Kristin E. Burnum-Johnson,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of lipids and metabolites in tissues by nanospray desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry , 2015, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[29]  Matthias Mann,et al.  High recovery FASP applied to the proteomic analysis of microdissected formalin fixed paraffin embedded cancer tissues retrieves known colon cancer markers. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[30]  Bernhard Kuster,et al.  Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present , 2012, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[31]  Douglas A. Hosack,et al.  Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE , 2003, Genome Biology.

[32]  Detlev Suckau,et al.  Classification of HER2 receptor status in breast cancer tissues by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[33]  Bernhard Spengler,et al.  Protein identification by accurate mass matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging of tryptic peptides. , 2011, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[34]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Proteomic Analysis of Single Mammalian Cells Enabled by Microfluidic Nanodroplet Sample Preparation and Ultrasensitive NanoLC-MS. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[35]  Peter Nemes,et al.  Single‐Cell Mass Spectrometry for Discovery Proteomics: Quantifying Translational Cell Heterogeneity in the 16‐Cell Frog (Xenopus) Embryo , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[36]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Spatially Resolved Proteome Mapping of Laser Capture Microdissected Tissue with Automated Sample Transfer to Nanodroplets* , 2018, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[37]  Peter Hoffmann,et al.  Tryptic peptide reference data sets for MALDI imaging mass spectrometry on formalin-fixed ovarian cancer tissues. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[38]  John R Yates,et al.  Mass spectrometry in high-throughput proteomics: ready for the big time , 2010, Nature Methods.

[39]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Benchtop-compatible sample processing workflow for proteome profiling of < 100 mammalian cells , 2018, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[40]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[41]  Eric P Skaar,et al.  MALDI FTICR IMS of Intact Proteins: Using Mass Accuracy to Link Protein Images with Proteomics Data , 2015, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[42]  Charles Darwin,et al.  Experiments , 1800, The Medical and physical journal.

[43]  Joel G Pounds,et al.  A comparative analysis of computational approaches to relative protein quantification using peptide peak intensities in label‐free LC‐MS proteomics experiments , 2013, Proteomics.

[44]  R. Heeren,et al.  A concise review of mass spectrometry imaging. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[45]  K. Hixson,et al.  Spatially Resolved Proteome Profiling of <200 Cells from Tomato Fruit Pericarp by Integrating Laser-Capture Microdissection with Nanodroplet Sample Preparation. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[46]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Nanodroplet processing platform for deep and quantitative proteome profiling of 10–100 mammalian cells , 2018, Nature Communications.

[47]  Jens M. Rick,et al.  Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[48]  Jeffrey M Spraggins,et al.  Protein identification strategies in MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: a brief review. , 2019, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[49]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[50]  John W M Martens,et al.  Optimized nLC-MS workflow for laser capture microdissected breast cancer tissue. , 2012, Journal of proteomics.

[51]  J. Morrow,et al.  Coordinated regulation of fetal and maternal prostaglandins directs successful birth and postnatal adaptation in the mouse. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  Julia Laskin,et al.  Trp53 deficient mice predisposed to preterm birth display region-specific lipid alterations at the embryo implantation site , 2016, Scientific Reports.