The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited

[1]  P. Frasconi,et al.  Learning first-pass structural attachment preferences with dynamic grammars and recursive neural networks , 2003, Cognition.

[2]  H. Pashler.  STEVENS' HANDBOOK OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY , 2002 .

[3]  David J. Therriault,et al.  A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence , 2002 .

[4]  Matthew J Traxler,et al.  Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children's processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences: Evidence from self-paced reading , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  Katherine S. Binder,et al.  The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2001 .

[6]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  G. Waters,et al.  Not so fast: Domain-general factors can account for selective deficits in grammatical processing , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  M. Pickering,et al.  Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1998 .

[10]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  E. Gibson.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[12]  M. Pickering,et al.  Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study , 1998 .

[13]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Late Closure in Context , 1998 .

[14]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[15]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Eye-movement-contingent display changes are not compromised by flicker and phosphor persistence , 1998 .

[16]  G. Waters,et al.  Working Memory and On-Line Sentence Comprehension in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease , 1997, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[17]  Lars Konieczny,et al.  The Role of Lexical Heads in Parsing: Evidence from German , 1997 .

[18]  G. Waters,et al.  The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter (1992) , 1996, Psychological review.

[19]  M A Just,et al.  The capacity theory of comprehension: new frontiers of evidence and arguments. , 1996, Psychological review.

[20]  J. Trueswell.  THE ROLE OF LEXICAL FREQUENCY IN SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION , 1996 .

[21]  G. Waters,et al.  Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Dan Jurafsky.  A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  L Frazier,et al.  Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[24]  David Caplan,et al.  Processing capacity and sentence comprehension in patients with alzheimer's disease , 1995 .

[25]  M. MacDonald,et al.  Individual Differences and Probabilistic Constraints in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1995 .

[26]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.

[27]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[28]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[29]  K Rayner,et al.  Regressive eye movements and sentence parsing: On the use of regression-contingent analyses , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[30]  M. A. Britt,et al.  The Interaction of Referential Ambiguity and Argument Structure in the Parsing of Prepositional Phrases , 1994 .

[31]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[32]  M. Just,et al.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Edward Gibson,et al.  A computational theory of human linguistic processing: memory limitations and processing breakdown , 1991 .

[34]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. , 1990 .

[35]  Gerry Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..

[36]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes , 1989 .

[37]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[38]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .

[40]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[42]  K. Rayner.  The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[44]  R. Kail,et al.  Distinguishing short-term memory from working memory , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[45]  C. Clifton,et al.  Sentence and text comprehension: roles of linguistic structure. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[46]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Falsifying Serial and Parallel Parsing Models: Empirical Conundrums and An Overlooked Paradigm , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[47]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Chapter 3 – Eye Movements and Measures of Reading Time , 1998 .

[48]  Burgess Roland Curt.  Interaction of semantic, syntactic and visual factors in syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1991 .

[49]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[50]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[51]  J. Hayes.  Cognition and the development of language , 1970 .