Robust Field-level Inference of Cosmological Parameters with Dark Matter Halos

We train graph neural networks on halo catalogs from Gadget N-body simulations to perform field-level likelihood-free inference of cosmological parameters. The catalogs contain ≲5000 halos with masses ≳1010 h −1 M ⊙ in a periodic volume of (25h−1Mpc)3 ; every halo in the catalog is characterized by several properties such as position, mass, velocity, concentration, and maximum circular velocity. Our models, built to be permutationally, translationally, and rotationally invariant, do not impose a minimum scale on which to extract information and are able to infer the values of Ωm and σ 8 with a mean relative error of ∼6%, when using positions plus velocities and positions plus masses, respectively. More importantly, we find that our models are very robust: they can infer the value of Ωm and σ 8 when tested using halo catalogs from thousands of N-body simulations run with five different N-body codes: Abacus, CUBEP3M, Enzo, PKDGrav3, and Ramses. Surprisingly, the model trained to infer Ωm also works when tested on thousands of state-of-the-art CAMELS hydrodynamic simulations run with four different codes and subgrid physics implementations. Using halo properties such as concentration and maximum circular velocity allow our models to extract more information, at the expense of breaking the robustness of the models. This may happen because the different N-body codes are not converged on the relevant scales corresponding to these parameters.

[1]  A. Heavens,et al.  The Cosmic Graph: Optimal Information Extraction from Large-Scale Structure using Catalogues , 2022, The Open Journal of Astrophysics.

[2]  F. Villaescusa-Navarro,et al.  Learning Cosmology and Clustering with Cosmic Graphs , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal.

[3]  Yu Feng,et al.  The ASTRID Simulation: Galaxy Formation and Reionization , 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[4]  T. D. Matteo,et al.  The ASTRID simulation: the evolution of Supermassive Black Holes , 2021, 2110.14154.

[5]  David N. Spergel,et al.  The CAMELS Multifield Data Set: Learning the Universe’s Fundamental Parameters with Artificial Intelligence , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[6]  D. Eisenstein,et al.  The abacus cosmological N-body code , 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[7]  D. Eisenstein,et al.  Good and proper: self-similarity of N-body simulations with proper force softening , 2021, 2102.08972.

[8]  I. Lapshov,et al.  The eROSITA X-ray telescope on SRG , 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[9]  R. Davé,et al.  The CAMELS Project: Cosmology and Astrophysics with Machine-learning Simulations , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[10]  D. Eisenstein,et al.  A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach to Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Redshift Surveys , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[11]  Ana Maria Delgado,et al.  The Quijote Simulations , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[12]  Rainer Weinberger,et al.  The AREPO Public Code Release , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[13]  István Csabai,et al.  Weak lensing cosmology with convolutional neural networks on noisy data , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[14]  D. Narayanan,et al.  simba: Cosmological simulations with black hole growth and feedback , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[15]  D. Eisenstein,et al.  A high-fidelity realization of the Euclid code comparison N-body simulation with Abacus , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[16]  Annalisa Pillepich,et al.  Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model , 2017, 1703.02970.

[17]  Joachim Stadel,et al.  PKDGRAV3: beyond trillion particle cosmological simulations for the next era of galaxy surveys , 2016, 1609.08621.

[18]  V. Springel,et al.  Simulating galaxy formation with black hole driven thermal and kinetic feedback , 2016, 1607.03486.

[19]  Joachim Stadel,et al.  Matter power spectrum and the challenge of percent accuracy , 2015, 1503.05920.

[20]  S. Borgani,et al.  An improved SPH scheme for cosmological simulations , 2015, 1502.07358.

[21]  P. Hopkins A new class of accurate, mesh-free hydrodynamic simulation methods , 2014, 1409.7395.

[22]  Andreas Burkert,et al.  Cosmological simulations of black hole growth: AGN luminosities and downsizing , 2013, 1308.0333.

[23]  Devin W. Silvia,et al.  ENZO: AN ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT CODE FOR ASTROPHYSICS , 2013, J. Open Source Softw..

[24]  Hugh Merz,et al.  High Performance P3M N-body code: CUBEP3M , 2012, 1208.5098.

[25]  Judith G. Cohen,et al.  Extragalactic science, cosmology, and Galactic archaeology with the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph , 2012, 1206.0737.

[26]  V. Springel E pur si muove: Galilean-invariant cosmological hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh , 2009, 0901.4107.

[27]  Michael S. Warren,et al.  The cosmic code comparison project , 2007, 0706.1270.

[28]  V. Springel The Cosmological simulation code GADGET-2 , 2005, astro-ph/0505010.

[29]  Michael S. Warren,et al.  Robustness of Cosmological Simulations. I. Large-Scale Structure , 2004, astro-ph/0411795.

[30]  V. Springel,et al.  Thermal conduction in cosmological SPH simulations , 2004, astro-ph/0401456.

[31]  S. Borgani,et al.  Thermal Conduction in Simulated Galaxy Clusters , 2004, astro-ph/0401470.

[32]  R. Teyssier Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement , 2001, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[33]  Padova,et al.  Populating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at z=0 , 2000, astro-ph/0012055.

[34]  Leslie Greengard,et al.  A fast algorithm for particle simulations , 1987 .

[35]  R W Hockney,et al.  Computer Simulation Using Particles , 1966 .