Modeling and optimization of a side-implanted piezoresistive shear stress sensor

This paper presents the modeling and design optimization of a micromachined floating element piezoresistive shear stress sensor for the time-resolved, direct measurement of fluctuating wall shear stress in a turbulent flow. The sensor structure integrates side-implanted diffused resistors into the silicon tethers for piezoresistive detection. A theoretical nonlinear mechanical model is combined with a piezoresistive model to determine the electromechanical sensitivity. Lumped element modeling (LEM) is used to estimate the resonant frequency. Finite element modeling is employed to verify the mechanical models and LEM results. Two dominant noise sources, 1/f noise and thermal noise, were considered to determine the noise floor. These models were then leveraged to obtain optimal sensor designs for several sets of specifications. The cost function is the minimum detectable shear stress that is formulated in terms of sensitivity and noise floor. This cost function is subjected to the constraints of geometry, linearity, bandwidth, power and resistance. The results indicate the possibility of designs possessing dynamic ranges of greater than 85dB.

[1]  M. A. Schmidt,et al.  A liquid shear-stress sensor fabricated using wafer bonding technology , 1991, TRANSDUCERS '91: 1991 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators. Digest of Technical Papers.

[2]  T. Nishida,et al.  A physically based mobility model for MOSFET numerical simulation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[3]  Mark Sheplak,et al.  Modern developments in shear-stress measurement ☆ , 2002 .

[4]  M. Rossi,et al.  Acoustics and Electroacoustics , 1992 .

[5]  K. R. Farmer,et al.  A MEMS device for measurement of skin friction with capacitive sensing , 2001, 2001 Microelectromechanical Systems Conference (Cat. No. 01EX521).

[6]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Piezoresistive Microphone Design Pareto Optimization: Tradeoff Between Sensitivity and Noise Floor , 2006 .

[7]  Beth L. Pruitt,et al.  Design, Fabrication, and Characterization of Piezoresistive MEMS Shear Stress Sensors , 2005 .

[8]  Louis N. Cattafesta,et al.  A MICROMACHINED GEOMETRIC MOIRÉ INTERFEROMETRIC FLOATING-ELEMENT SHEAR STRESS SENSOR , 2004 .

[9]  M. Madou Fundamentals of microfabrication , 1997 .

[10]  Tao Pan,et al.  Microfabricated Shear Stress Sensors, Part 2: Testing and Calibration , 1999 .

[11]  R. Haftka,et al.  Elements of Structural Optimization , 1984 .

[12]  Thomas W. Kenny,et al.  Independent detection of vertical and lateral forces with a sidewall-implanted dual-axis piezoresistive cantilever , 1998 .

[13]  T. Kenny,et al.  1/f noise considerations for the design and process optimization of piezoresistive cantilevers , 2000, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[14]  H. Nyquist Thermal Agitation of Electric Charge in Conductors , 1928 .

[15]  Martin A. Schmidt,et al.  A microfabricated floating-element shear stress sensor using wafer-bonding technology , 1992 .

[16]  A. Nayfeh,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Structural Mechanics , 2002 .

[17]  Ruben Rathnasingham,et al.  Active control of turbulent boundary layers , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  F. Hooge 1/ƒ noise is no surface effect , 1969 .

[19]  Martin A. Schmidt,et al.  A wafer-bonded floating-element shear stress microsensor with optical position sensing by photodiodes , 1996 .

[20]  R. Howe,et al.  Design and calibration of a microfabricated floating-element shear-stress sensor , 1988 .

[21]  S. Senturia Microsystem Design , 2000 .

[22]  L.K.J. Vandamme,et al.  Annealing of ion‐implanted resistors reduces the 1/ f noise , 1986 .