MULTIDIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATION OF GEOGRAPHIC FEATURES

A theoretical framework for representing spatial, thematic, and temporal dimensions of geographic features has been developed. This framework relies on the unifying concept of a geographic feature as a single, unique entity in the real world with multiple object representations such as raster and vector geometries, multiple resolutions and source scales, and multiple temporal sequences. The same geographic feature can be represented in the framework at one resolution as a point and at a higher resolution as an area. Similarly, linear features such as streams can be represented as single lines at a coarse resolution and as double lines and areas at higher resolutions. Changes in spatial configuration and thematic attribution through time are also supported in the framework. Although an earlier implementation of this framework used relational database technology, implementation now focuses on object-oriented approaches. The implementation logically follows the organization of category theory, with the feature forming the basic level of categorization. An implementation for a watershed modeling application is built to test the theory. The application requires multiple feature types, such as the linear structure of the stream network embedded within the areal structure of the watershed. The multiple representations required for the watershed application include points for rain gage and stream sampling stations, which are used with digital elevation data to define polygons representing subwatersheds, vector geometry for the streams, network topology for the interstream connections and flow models, and raster geometry for the elevation surface, land cover, and soils. These requirements provide a test of the basic theoretical structure for geographic features.

[1]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[2]  Robert B Mc Master,et al.  Conceptual frameworks for geographical knowledge , 1991 .

[3]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[4]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Qualitative Spatial Reasoning with Cardinal Directions , 1991, ÖGAI.

[5]  Christian Freksa,et al.  Using Orientation Information for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning , 1992, Spatio-Temporal Reasoning.

[6]  J. D. Uiiman Principles of database systems , 1982 .

[7]  Jesse M. Draper,et al.  Guide on Data Models in the Selection and Use of Database Management Systems | NIST , 1984 .

[8]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  A spatial analytical perspective on geographical information systems , 1987, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Andrew U. Frank Formal Models for Cognition - Taxonomy of Spatial Location Description and Frames of Reference , 1998, Spatial Cognition.

[10]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: The Clock Project , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Martien Molenaar,et al.  A syntax for the representation of fuzzy spatial objects. , 1994 .

[12]  David M. Mark,et al.  Toward a Theoretical Framework for Geographic Entity Types , 1993, COSIT.

[13]  E. F. Codd,et al.  A relational model of data for large shared data banks , 1970, CACM.

[14]  E. L. Usery Category Theory and the Structure of Features in Geographic Information Systems , 1993 .

[15]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  Qualitative and Topological Relationships in Spatial Databases , 1993, SSD.

[16]  E. F. Codd,et al.  A Relational Model for Large Shared Data Banks , 1970 .

[17]  G. Langran Time in Geographic Information Systems , 1990 .

[18]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS , 1995, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[19]  G. Lakoff Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[20]  Daniel Hernández,et al.  Maintaining Qualitative Spatial Knowledge , 1993, COSIT.

[21]  Neil Stuart,et al.  Time in Geographic Information-Systems - Langran,G , 1992 .

[22]  E. Lynn Usery,et al.  A Spatial Data Model Design for Feature-Based Geographical Information Systems , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Brian J. L. Berry,et al.  APPROACHES TO REGIONAL ANALYSIS: A SYNTHESIS , 1964 .

[24]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[25]  Eliseo Clementini,et al.  A Small Set of Formal Topological Relationships Suitable for End-User Interaction , 1993, SSD.

[26]  Kai Zimmermann,et al.  Enhancing Qualitative Spatial Reasoning - Combining Orientation and Distance , 1993, COSIT.

[27]  Stephen C. Guptill An enhanced digital line graph design , 1990 .

[28]  Raghu Ramakrishnan,et al.  Database Management Systems , 1976 .

[29]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  A Formalization of Metaphors and Image-Schemas in User Interfaces , 1991 .

[30]  David M. Mark,et al.  Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space: New Perspectives on Geographic Information Research , 1991 .

[31]  M. Molenaar,et al.  Status and problems of geographical information systems. The necessity of a geoinformation theory , 1991 .

[32]  Donna J. Peuquet,et al.  Representations of Geographic Space: Toward a Conceptual Synthesis , 1988 .

[33]  S. Sudarshan,et al.  Data models , 1996, CSUR.

[34]  Donna J. Peuquet,et al.  A Conceptual Framework and Comparison of Spatial Data Models , 1984 .

[35]  John Freeman,et al.  The modelling of spatial relations , 1975 .

[36]  E. L. Usery A feature-based geographic information system model , 1996 .

[37]  M. Egenhofer,et al.  Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations , 2001 .