Does your SEM really tell the truth?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Michael T. Postek,et al. Reference material (RM) 8820: a versatile new NIST standard for nanometrology , 2010, Advanced Lithography.
[2] Dale E. Newbury,et al. Faults and foibles of quantitative scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive x-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS) , 2012, Defense + Commercial Sensing.
[3] Peters Kr,et al. Working at higher magnifications in scanning electron microscopy with secondary and backscattered electrons on metal coated biological specimens and imaging macromolecular cell membrane structures. , 1985 .
[4] Samuel N. Jones,et al. Interlaboratory Study on the Lithographically Produced Scanning Electron Microscope Magnification Standard Prototype , 1993, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[5] M. Postek,et al. The relationship between accelerating voltage and electron detection modes to linewidth measurement in an SEM , 1988 .
[6] András E Vladár,et al. Modeling for accurate dimensional scanning electron microscope metrology: then and now. , 2011, Scanning.
[7] Michael T. Postek,et al. Parameters characterizing the measurement of a critical dimension , 1994, Advanced Lithography.
[8] M. Postek. CRITICAL ISSUES IN SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE METROLOGY , 1994 .
[9] Michael T. Postek,et al. Report of Investigation: Reference Material 8090 - SEM Magnification Calibration Reference Material | NIST , 1995 .
[10] Petersen Kr. Conditions required for high quality high magnification images in secondary electron-I scanning electron microscopy. , 1982 .
[11] T. Everhart,et al. SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE , 2014 .
[12] Ndubuisi G. Orji,et al. Strategies for nanoscale contour metrology using critical dimension atomic force microscopy , 2011, NanoScience + Engineering.