Kinematic and non-kinematic signals transmitted to the cat cerebellum during passive treadmill stepping

Previous work from this laboratory has shown that activity in the dorsal spinocerebellar tract (DSCT) relates strongly to global hindlimb kinematics variables during passive displacements of the hindlimb. A linear relationship to limb axis orientation and length variables accounts for most of the response variance for passive limb positioning and movement. Here we extend those observations to more natural movements by examining the information carried by the DSCT during passive stepping movements on a treadmill, and we compare it to information transmitted during passive robot-driven hindlimb movements. Using a principal component analysis approach, we found that a linear relationship between the responses and hindlimb kinematics was comparable across experimental conditions. We also observed systematic non-linearities in this relationship for both types of movement that could be attributed to events corresponding to the touch-down and lift-off phases of the movement. We concluded that proprioceptive information transmitted to the cerebellum by the DSCT during locomotion has at least two major components. One component is associated with limb kinematics (limb orientation) and may be more or less related to the metrics of the step (stride length, for example) or its velocity. The other component is associated with limb length and/or limb loading, and it may signal some aspect of limb stiffness.

[1]  R. Poppele,et al.  Representation of passive hindlimb postures in cat spinocerebellar activity. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Duysens,et al.  Load-regulating mechanisms in gait and posture: comparative aspects. , 2000, Physiological reviews.

[3]  R. Poppele,et al.  Small-signal analysis of response of mammalian muscle spindles with fusimotor stimulation and a comparison with large-signal responses. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  V. Dietz Proprioception and locomotor disorders , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  K. Pearson,et al.  Contribution of sensory feedback to the generation of extensor activity during walking in the decerebrate Cat. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Control of foot trajectory in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces in simulated reduced gravity. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  R. Poppele,et al.  Reference frames for spinal proprioception: limb endpoint based or joint-level based? , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Keir G Pearson,et al.  Generating the walking gait: role of sensory feedback. , 2004, Progress in brain research.

[9]  Serge Rossignol,et al.  Critical points in the forelimb fictive locomotor cycle and motor coordination: evidence from the effects of tonic proprioceptive perturbations in the cat. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Poppele,et al.  Modulation of dorsal spinocerebellar responses to limb movement. II. Effect of sensory input. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Low sensitivity of dorsal spinocerebellar neurons to limb movement speed , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  R. Poppele,et al.  Independent representations of limb axis length and orientation in spinocerebellar response components. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Eian,et al.  Dorsal spinocerebellar tract neurons respond to contralateral limb stepping , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  R. Poppele,et al.  Reference frames for spinal proprioception: kinematics based or kinetics based? , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  R E Poppele,et al.  Encoding of hindlimb kinematics by spinocerebellar circuitry. , 2002, Archives italiennes de biologie.