Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring

Problem-structuring techniques are an integral aspect of ‘Soft-OR’. SSM, SAST, Strategic Choice, and JOURNEY Making, all depend for their success on a group developing a shared view of a problem through some form of explicit modelling. The negotiated problem structure becomes the basis for problem resolution. Implicit to this process is an assumption that members of the group share and build their knowledge about the problem domain. This paper explores the extent to which this assumption is reasonable. The research is based on detailed records from the use of JOURNEY Making, where it has used special purpose Group Support software to aid the group problem structuring. This software continuously tracks the contributions of each member of the group and thus the extent to which they appear to be ‘connecting’ and augmenting their own knowledge with that of other members of the group. Software records of problem resolution in real organisational settings are used to explore the sharing of knowledge among senior managers. These explorations suggest a typology of knowledge sharing. The implications of this typology for problem structuring and an agenda for future research are considered.

[1]  U. Neisser.  The multiplicity of thought. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[2]  Peter McHugh.  Defining the situation , 1968 .

[3]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[4]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[5]  Amiram D. Vinokur,et al.  What a person thinks upon learning he has chosen differently from others: Nice evidence for the persuasive-arguments explanation of choice shifts , 1975 .

[6]  R. Abelson.  Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. , 1976 .

[7]  Christopher Leone,et al.  Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change , 1977 .

[8]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  The Art and Science of Mess Management , 1981 .

[9]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[10]  S. French.  Planning under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach , 1988 .

[11]  L. Michael Hager,et al.  Getting Together: Building a Relationship that gets to Yes. By Roger Fisher and Scott Brown, Boston, Massachusetts. Houghton Mifflin Company. 1988 , 1988 .

[12]  Frank Land,et al.  Knowledge based management support systems , 1989 .

[13]  Tony Hindle,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World , 1990 .

[14]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Electronic Groups at Work. , 1990 .

[15]  Colin Eden,et al.  Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support , 1991 .

[16]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[17]  W. Blatchford,et al.  Getting a yes.... , 1992, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[18]  C. Eden.  ON THE NATURE OF COGNITIVE MAPS , 1992 .

[19]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[20]  R. Bennett,et al.  The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. , 1993 .

[21]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[22]  R. Brent Gallupe,et al.  Blocking electronic brainstorms. , 1994 .

[23]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  The Structuring of Creative Processes using GSS: A Framework for Research , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Colin Eden,et al.  On evaluating the performance of 'wide-band' GDSS's , 1995 .

[25]  C. Carlsson,et al.  AHP in Political Group Decisions: A Study in the Art of Possibilities , 1995 .

[26]  Renée Mauborgne,et al.  A Procedural Justice Model of Strategic Decision Making: Strategy Content Implications in the Multinational , 1995 .

[27]  J. J. Quinn,et al.  The Role of ‘Good Conversation’ In Strategic Control , 1996 .

[28]  Lutz E. Schlange.  Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[29]  Robert Fildes.  Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[30]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Inspiring Group Creativity , 1998 .

[31]  C. Eden,et al.  Analysing and comparing idiographic causal maps , 1998 .

[32]  C. Eden,et al.  Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management , 1998 .

[33]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Randolph B. Cooper,et al.  The Effect of Computer-Mediated Communication on Agreement and Acceptance , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming , 1999, MIS Q..

[36]  C. Huxham,et al.  Leadership In The Shaping And Implementation Of Collaboration Agendas: How Things Happen In A (Not Quite) Joined-Up World , 2000 .

[37]  C Eden,et al.  Mapping distinctive competencies: a systemic approach , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[38]  P H Grinyer,et al.  A cognitive approach to group strategic decision taking: a discussion of evolved practice in the light of received research results , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[39]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity , 2001 .

[40]  Colin Eden,et al.  SODA - The principles , 2001 .

[41]  Duncan Andrew Shaw.  Exploring what happens in a JOURNEY Making gathering : using group communication software to support brainstorm-type activities , 2001 .

[42]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited , 2001 .

[43]  A. Huff.  Mapping Strategic Knowledge , 2002 .

[44]  Gerry Johnson,et al.  Facilitating Group Cognitive Mapping of Core Competencies , 2002 .

[45]  Keith Mattacks,et al.  Managing Knowledge Work , 2003 .

[46]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology , 2020, Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide.

[47]  G. Kelly.  The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .