Comparison of spiral-in/out and spiral-out BOLD fMRI at 1.5 and 3 T

Spiral-in/out functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) methods acquire one image before the echo time (TE) and a second image after TE during each scan. Weighted combination of the two images provides a time series with reduced susceptibility dropout in frontal and medial temporal regions as well as increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in regions of uniform cortex. In this study, task activation with the spiral-in/out method was compared to that with conventional spiral-out acquisitions at two field strengths (1.5 and 3.0 T) using episodic memory encoding, verbal working memory, and affective processing tasks in eight human volunteers. With the conventional spiral-out sequence, greater signal dropout is observed in lateral and medial prefrontal, amygdalar, and medial temporal regions at 3 T relative to 1.5 T, whereas such dropout at 3 T is reduced or mitigated with the spiral-in/out method. Similarly, activation volumes for frontal, amygdalar, and medial temporal regions are reduced for spiral-out acquisitions relative to spiral-in/out, and this difference is more apparent at 3 T than at 1.5 T. In addition, significant regionally specific increases in Z scores are obtained with the spiral-in/out sequence relative to spiral-out acquisitions at both field strengths. It is concluded the spiral-in/out sequence may provide significant advantages over conventional spiral methods, especially at 3 T.

[1]  G. Glover,et al.  Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  R. Lane,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of happiness, sadness, and disgust. , 1997, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[4]  G. Glover,et al.  Self‐navigated spiral fMRI: Interleaved versus single‐shot , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[6]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Comparison of fMRI activation at 3 and 1.5 T during perceptual, cognitive, and affective processing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[7]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Comparison of 3D BOLD Functional MRI with Spiral Acquisition at 1.5 and 4.0 T , 1999, NeuroImage.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[9]  J. Pauly,et al.  Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  G H Glover,et al.  Three‐dimensional spiral fMRI technique: A comparison with 2D spiral acquisition , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Working Memory: A View from Neuroimaging , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[14]  J. Gross Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Gary H Glover,et al.  Improved combination of spiral‐in/out images for BOLD fMRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Rethinking Feelings: An fMRI Study of the Cognitive Regulation of Emotion , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  G. Glover,et al.  Spiral‐in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  G H Glover,et al.  Separate neural bases of two fundamental memory processes in the human medial temporal lobe. , 1997, Science.

[19]  G H Glover,et al.  Simple analytic spiral K‐space algorithm , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  R. Constable,et al.  Composite image formation in z‐shimmed functional MR imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  T. Mosher,et al.  Removal of local field gradient artifacts in T2*‐weighted images at high fields by gradient‐echo slice excitation profile imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  K F King,et al.  Concomitant gradient field effects in spiral scans , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  G H Glover,et al.  3D z‐shim method for reduction of susceptibility effects in BOLD fMRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  R. Turner,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex at 4 and 1.5 tesla using deoxygenation contrast EPI , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  K. Tamura,et al.  Metabolic engineering of plant alkaloid biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2001 .

[26]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  A multiprocess perspective on the neuroscience of emotion. , 2001 .

[28]  J. R. Baker,et al.  The hippocampal formation participates in novel picture encoding: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Generalisability, Random Effects & Population Inference , 1998, NeuroImage.

[30]  G. Bonanno,et al.  Emotions : current issues and future directions , 2001 .

[31]  M. Bradley,et al.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[32]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  V A Stenger,et al.  Three‐dimensional tailored RF pulses for the reduction of susceptibility artifacts in T*2‐weighted functional MRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  G. Glover,et al.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  G. Glover,et al.  Regularized higher‐order in vivo shimming , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  P. Eslinger,et al.  Multi‐gradient echo with susceptibility inhomogeneity compensation (MGESIC): Demonstration of fMRI in the olfactory cortex at 3.0 T , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.