Towards beyond Visual Line of Sight Piloting of UAVs with Ultra Reliable Low Latency Communication

In this paper, we propose a model for beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) operation for remote piloting of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which utilizes different technologies such as mobile edge computing and augmented reality. Ultra reliable low latency communication (URLLC) is a key service of 5G that enables safe BVLOS operation. Since message size of piloting signal is finite and communication channel is altitude dependent, we study reliability and latency under finite blocklength regime for different altitudes. In our numerical study, we find that for message sizes 30 and 50 bits, coded packet size, i.e., blocklength, should be in the range of 200 and 300 bits to enable BVLOS operation. We also found that minimum distance between UAVs to avoid any crash should be around 0.2 m for 15 m/s UAV speed and different altitudes ranging from 1.5 m to 120 m. According to our study, BVLOS operation of UAVs can be realized by URLLC by providing error probability in the vicinity of $10^{-3}$, and latency on the order of milliseconds for downlink communication with blocklength of tens to hundred bits.​

[1]  Giuseppe Durisi,et al.  Block-Fading Channels at Finite Blocklength , 2013, ISWCS.

[2]  Andreas Mitschele-Thiel,et al.  Latency Critical IoT Applications in 5G: Perspective on the Design of Radio Interface and Network Architecture , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[4]  Christian Bettstetter,et al.  Channel measurements over 802.11a-based UAV-to-ground links , 2011, 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[5]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  Finite-blocklength analysis of the ARQ-protocol throughput over the Gaussian collision channel , 2014, 2014 6th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP).

[6]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[7]  Chenyang Yang,et al.  Cross-Layer Optimization for Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Radio Access Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Air–Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems—Part I: Methods, Measurements, and Models for Over-Water Settings , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Byonghyo Shim,et al.  Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications in 5G Downlink: Physical Layer Aspects , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[10]  Sofie Pollin,et al.  LTE in the sky: trading off propagation benefits with interference costs for aerial nodes , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  Wireless Access for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication: Principles and Building Blocks , 2018, IEEE Network.

[12]  Krzysztof Wesolowski,et al.  Channel Coding for Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication in 5G Systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[13]  Jeroen Wigard,et al.  Radio Channel Modeling for UAV Communication Over Cellular Networks , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[14]  Luc Rolland,et al.  Beyond Line of Sight Control of Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Using a Synthetic Environment to Augment First Person Video , 2015 .

[15]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Channel Coding Rate in the Finite Blocklength Regime , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Yan Wang,et al.  Cooperative localization in 5G networks: A survey , 2017, ICT Express.

[17]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  A Survey of Channel Modeling for UAV Communications , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[18]  Petar Popovski,et al.  Towards Massive, Ultra-Reliable, and Low-Latency Wireless Communication with Short Packets , 2015 .

[19]  Greg Orrell,et al.  ADS-B Surveillance System Performance With Small UAS at Low Altitudes , 2017 .

[20]  Emil Björnson,et al.  Random Access Protocols for Massive MIMO , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.