A test of crystal structure prediction of small organic molecules.

A collaborative workshop was held in May 1999 at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre to test how well currently available methods of crystal structure prediction perform when given only the atomic connectivity for an organic compound. A blind test was conducted on a selection of four compounds and a wide range of methodologies representing, the principal computer programs currently available were used. There were 11 participants who were allowed to propose at most three structures for each compound. No program gave consistently reliable results. However, seven proposed structures were close to an experimental one and were classified as "correct". One compound occurred in two polymorphs, but only one form was predicted correctly among the calculated structures. The basic problem with lattice energy based methods of crystal structure prediction is that many structures are found within a few kJ mol(-1) of the global minimum. The fine detail of the force-field methodology and parametrization influences the energy ranking within each method. Nevertheless, present methods may be useful in providing a set of structures as possible polymorphs for a given molecular structure.

[1]  F. Leusen.  Ab initio prediction of polymorphs , 1996 .

[2]  Roland Boese,et al.  The Melting Point Alternation in the Short-Chain n-Alkanes: Single-Crystal X-Ray Analyses of Propane at 30 K and of n-Butane to n-Nonane at 90 K. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  Peter G. Bruce,et al.  A General Monte Carlo Approach to Structure Solution from Powder Diffraction Data: Application to Poly(ethylene oxide)3:LiN(SO3CF3)2 , 1997 .

[4]  R. J. Doerksen,et al.  Structures, Vibrational Frequencies and Polarizabilities of Diazaborinines, Triazadiborinines, Azaboroles, and Oxazaboroles , 1999 .

[5]  D. E. Williams,et al.  Accelerated convergence of crystal-lattice potential sums , 1971 .

[6]  James R. Holden,et al.  Prediction of possible crystal structures for C‐, H‐, N‐, O‐, and F‐containing organic compounds , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[7]  R. Boese,et al.  Die Schmelzpunktalternanz der kurzkettigen n‐Alkane: Einkristall‐Röntgenstrukturanalysen von Propan bei 30 K und von n‐Butan bis n‐Nonan bei 90 K , 1999 .

[8]  Thomas A. Halgren,et al.  The representation of van der Waals (vdW) interactions in molecular mechanics force fields: potential form, combination rules, and vdW parameters , 1992 .

[9]  William I. F. David,et al.  Crystal structure determination from powder diffraction data by the application of a genetic algorithm , 1997 .

[10]  A. Gavezzotti,et al.  Polymorphic Forms of Organic Crystals at Room Conditions: Thermodynamic and Structural Implications , 1995 .

[11]  Robin Taylor,et al.  SuperStar: a knowledge-based approach for identifying interaction sites in proteins. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A Discrete Algorithm for Crystal Structure Prediction of Organic Molecules , 1997 .

[13]  Robin Taylor,et al.  IsoStar: A library of information about nonbonded interactions , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[14]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  DREIDING: A generic force field for molecular simulations , 1990 .

[15]  P. Kollman,et al.  A well-behaved electrostatic potential-based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic char , 1993 .

[16]  Sarah L. Price,et al.  Predictions of Crystal Packings for Uracil, 6-Azauracil, and Allopurinol: The Interplay between Hydrogen Bonding and Close Packing , 1997 .

[17]  F. Allen,et al.  Implications of molecular and materials structure for new technologies , 1999 .

[18]  Donald E. Williams,et al.  Nonbonded Potential Function Models for Crystalline Oxohydrocarbons , 1981 .

[19]  C. Breneman,et al.  Determining atom‐centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis , 1990 .

[20]  Sarah L. Price,et al.  Role of electrostatic interactions in determining the crystal structures of polar organic molecules. A distributed multipole study , 1996 .

[21]  Donald E. Williams,et al.  Failure of net atomic charge models to represent the van der Waals envelope electric potential of n‐alkanes , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..

[22]  A. Gavezzotti,et al.  Geometry of the Intermolecular X-H.cntdot..cntdot..cntdot.Y (X, Y = N, O) Hydrogen Bond and the Calibration of Empirical Hydrogen-Bond Potentials , 1994 .

[23]  Dario Braga,et al.  Crystal Engineering: From Molecules and Crystals to Materials , 1999 .

[24]  A. Gavezzotti,et al.  Are Crystal Structures Predictable , 1994 .

[25]  Owen Johnson,et al.  The development of versions 3 and 4 of the Cambridge Structural Database System , 1991, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[26]  David J. Willock,et al.  The relaxation of molecular crystal structures using a distributed multipole electrostatic model , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[27]  A. Gavezzotti,et al.  Generation of possible crystal structures from molecular structure for low-polarity organic compounds , 1991 .

[28]  Jan Kroon,et al.  Upack program package for crystal structure prediction: Force fields and crystal structure generation for small carbohydrate molecules , 1999, J. Comput. Chem..

[29]  M. Dewar.  Chemical Constitution , 1955, Nature.

[30]  Kenneth D. M. Harris,et al.  PowderSolve – a complete package for crystal structure solution from powder diffraction patterns , 1999 .

[31]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.