Upstairs/downstairs revisited: spatial pretraining‐induced rescue of normal spatial learning during selective blockade of hippocampal N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptors

Spatial pretraining can enable spatial learning in another environment that ordinarily requires hippocampal N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor activity to become independent of that activity. This study explored further the circumstances in which this training‐induced ‘rescue’ of later learning in the presence of the NMDA receptor antagonist 2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovaleric acid (D‐AP5) can occur. D‐AP5 (0, 10, 20 and 30 mm in artificial cerebrospinal fluid) was infused continuously (0.5 μL/h, from a minipump) and bilaterally into the dorsal hippocampus during spatial‐reference‐memory training in a watermaze (4 trials/day, 8 days). This was preceded either by handling only or by identical spatial training in another watermaze in a separate laboratory with different extramaze cues. In naïve rats, D‐AP5 caused a dose‐related impairment in spatial reference memory acquisition that was significant at the lowest 5 nm/h infusion concentration. In pretrained rats, the dose–response function was shifted such that, in watermaze 2, spatial learning was normal at this low concentration, with a deficit at higher infusion concentrations. The induction of long‐term potentiation in the dentate gyrus in vivo was blocked at all D‐AP5 concentrations. Sensorimotor abnormalities sometimes seen with NMDA receptor antagonists were only apparent at the highest concentration. The implication of this paradoxical dissociation between hippocampal NMDA receptor‐dependent plasticity and spatial learning is discussed with reference to two rival hypotheses of the impact of pretraining.

[1]  Szu-Han Wang,et al.  Dorsal hippocampus is necessary for novel learning but sufficient for subsequent similar learning , 2012, Hippocampus.

[2]  G. Handelmann,et al.  Hippocampus, space, and memory , 1979 .

[3]  R. Morris,et al.  Distinct components of spatial learning revealed by prior training and NMDA receptor blockade , 1995, Nature.

[4]  M. Wilson,et al.  NMDA receptors, place cells and hippocampal spatial memory , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  D. Cain,et al.  Testing hypotheses of spatial learning: the role of NMDA receptors and NMDA-mediated long-term potentiation , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  R. Morris,et al.  Elements of a neurobiological theory of hippocampal function: the role of synaptic plasticity, synaptic tagging and schemas , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  Jonathan R. Whitlock,et al.  Learning Induces Long-Term Potentiation in the Hippocampus , 2006, Science.

[8]  H. Okaichi,et al.  Pretraining does not ameliorate spatial learning deficits induced by intrahippocampal infusion of AP5. , 2009, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  Szu-Han Wang,et al.  Storage or retrieval deficit: the yin and yang of amnesia. , 2009, Learning & memory.

[10]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Subregion- and Cell Type–Restricted Gene Knockout in Mouse Brain , 1996, Cell.

[11]  D. Cain,et al.  Complex Behavioral Strategy and Reversal Learning in the Water Maze without NMDA Receptor-Dependent Long-Term Potentiation , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Morris,et al.  Memory Reconsolidation: Sensitivity of Spatial Memory to Inhibition of Protein Synthesis in Dorsal Hippocampus during Encoding and Retrieval , 2006, Neuron.

[13]  Michael S. Fanselow,et al.  Pre-training prevents context fear conditioning deficits produced by hippocampal NMDA receptor blockade , 2003, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[14]  S. J. Martin,et al.  New life in an old idea: The synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis revisited , 2002, Hippocampus.

[15]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Learning-induced LTP in neocortex. , 2000, Science.

[16]  M. Mayford Navigating uncertain waters , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  S. J. Martin,et al.  N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptors, learning and memory: chronic intraventricular infusion of the NMDA receptor antagonist d‐AP5 interacts directly with the neural mechanisms of spatial learning , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  M. P. Witter,et al.  Does assimilation into schemas involve systems or cellular consolidation? It’s not just time , 2008, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[19]  J. Rawlins,et al.  Dissecting Spatial Knowledge from Spatial Choice by Hippocampal NMDA Receptor Deletion , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Moser,et al.  Functional differentiation in the hippocampus , 1998, Hippocampus.

[21]  C. H. Vanderwolf,et al.  Detailed behavioral analysis of water maze acquisition under systemic NMDA or muscarinic antagonism: nonspatial pretraining eliminates spatial learning deficits. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  D. Cain,et al.  Spatial learning without NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation , 1995, Nature.

[23]  J. Rawlins,et al.  The drugs don’t work—or do they? Pharmacological and transgenic studies of the contribution of NMDA and GluR-A-containing AMPA receptors to hippocampal-dependent memory , 2006, Psychopharmacology.

[24]  P. H. Seeburg,et al.  Spatial memory dissociations in mice lacking GluR1 , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  R. Morris Spatial Localization Does Not Require the Presence of Local Cues , 1981 .

[26]  R. Morris,et al.  The NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intracerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  Alcino J. Silva,et al.  The Hippocampus Plays a Selective Role in the Retrieval of Detailed Contextual Memories , 2010, Current Biology.

[28]  R. Morris,et al.  Delay‐dependent impairment of a matching‐to‐place task with chronic and intrahippocampal infusion of the NMDA‐antagonist D‐AP5 , 1999, Hippocampus.

[29]  I. Whishaw Place Learning in Hippocampal Rats and the Path Integration Hypothesis , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[30]  T. Yagi,et al.  Reduced hippocampal LTP and spatial learning in mice lacking NMDA receptor ε1 subunit , 1995, Nature.

[31]  S H Salter,et al.  The Atlantis platform: a new design and further developments of Buresova's on-demand platform for the water maze. , 1994, Learning & memory.

[32]  R. Morris,et al.  From Rapid Place Learning to Behavioral Performance: A Key Role for the Intermediate Hippocampus , 2009, PLoS biology.

[33]  Agnès Gruart,et al.  Involvement of the CA3–CA1 Synapse in the Acquisition of Associative Learning in Behaving Mice , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  C. Parsons,et al.  Modulation of learning processes by ionotropic glutamate receptor ligands. , 1995, Behavioural pharmacology.

[35]  S. J. Martin,et al.  Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  D. Cain Testing the NMDA, Long-term Potentiation, and Cholinergic Hypotheses of Spatial Learning , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[37]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Episodic memory: what can animals remember about their past? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  J. Rawlins,et al.  Contribution of Hippocampal and Extra-Hippocampal NR2B-Containing NMDA Receptors to Performance on Spatial Learning Tasks , 2008, Neuron.

[39]  G. Collingridge,et al.  Excitatory amino acids in synaptic transmission in the Schaffer collateral‐commissural pathway of the rat hippocampus. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  C. Gallistel The Organization of Action: A New Synthesis , 1982 .

[41]  J. Hall,et al.  Detailed behavioral analysis of water maze acquisition under APV or CNQX: contribution of sensorimotor disturbances to drug-induced acquisition deficits. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[42]  B. Platt,et al.  Glutamate receptor function in learning and memory , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[43]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Postsynaptic Receptor Trafficking Underlying a Form of Associative Learning , 2005, Science.

[44]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[45]  T. Bliss,et al.  A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus , 1993, Nature.

[46]  G. Lynch,et al.  Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5 , 1986, Nature.

[47]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays , 1998, Nature.

[48]  Dorothy Tse,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S5 Tables S1 to S3 Electron Impact (ei) Mass Spectra Chemical Ionization (ci) Mass Spectra References Schemas and Memory Consolidation Research Articles Research Articles Research Articles Research Articles , 2022 .

[49]  R. Morris,et al.  Glutamate-receptor-mediated encoding and retrieval of paired-associate learning , 2003, Nature.