The effect of nonlinear human visual system components on performance of a channelized Hotelling observer in structured backgrounds

Linear model observers based on statistical decision theory have been used successfully to predict human visual detection of aperiodic signals in a variety of noisy backgrounds. However, some models have included nonlinearities such as a transducer or nonlinear decision rules to handle intrinsic uncertainty. In addition, masking models used to predict human visual detection of signals superimposed on one of two identical backgrounds (masks) usually include a number of nonlinear components in the channels that reflect properties of the firing of cells in the primary visual cortex (V1). The effect of these nonlinearities on the ability of linear model observers to predict human signal detection in real patient structured backgrounds is unknown. We evaluate the effect of including different nonlinear human visual system components into a linear channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) using a signal known exactly but variable (SKEV) task. In particular, we evaluate whether the rank order of two compression algorithms (JPEG versus JPEG 2000) and two compression encoder settings (JPEG 2000 default versus JPEG 2000 optimized) based on model observer signal detection performance in X-ray coronary angiograms is altered by inclusion of nonlinear components. The results show: 1) the simpler linear CHO model observer outperforms CHO model with the nonlinear components; 2) the rank order of model observer performance for the compression algorithms/parameters does not change when the nonlinear components are included. For the present task and images, the results suggest that the addition of the nonlinearities to a channelized Hotelling model may add complexity to the model observers without great impact on rank order evaluation of image processing and/or acquisition algorithms

[1]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Evaluation of JPEG 2000 encoder options: human and model observer detection of variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Aperture optimization for emission imaging: effect of a spatially varying background. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  Perceptual image distortion , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[4]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Detection of chromoluminance patterns on chromoluminance pedestals II: model , 2000, Vision Research.

[7]  A. B. Bonds Role of Inhibition in the Specification of Orientation Selectivity of Cells in the Cat Striate Cortex , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[8]  W. P. Tanner PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL DATA * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms. , 2005, Radiology.

[10]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[14]  J. Robson,et al.  Spatial-frequency channels in human vision. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[15]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  T. Meese,et al.  Adaptation and gain pool summation: alternative models and masking data , 2002, Vision Research.

[17]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Evaluation of internal noise methods for Hotelling observers , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Daugman Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  S Marcelja,et al.  Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[22]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  What is degrading human visual detection peformance in natural medical image backgrounds? , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[23]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[24]  N. Graham Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[25]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. III. Calculation of figures of merit for model observers in statistically nonstationary backgrounds. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[26]  D. Heeger Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[28]  D. Wilson,et al.  Effect of inherent location uncertainty on detection of stationary targets in noisy image sequences. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  Harrison H Barrett,et al.  Task-based lens design with application to digital mammography. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[30]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[32]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Saccadic and perceptual performance in visual search tasks. I. Contrast detection and discrimination. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[33]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Ideal Observer Models of Visual Signal Detection , 2000 .

[34]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Automated optimization of JPEG 2000 encoder options based on model observer performance for detecting variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  F. Campbell,et al.  Optical quality of the human eye , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  Matt A. King,et al.  Channelized hotelling and human observer correlation for lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[37]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Components of variance in ROC analysis of CADx classifier performance: II. Applications of the bootstrap , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[38]  J A Solomon,et al.  Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[39]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[40]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Lesion detection in structured noise. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[41]  H.H. Barrett,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[42]  Jie Yao,et al.  Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model , 1992, Optics & Photonics.

[43]  Joan L. Mitchell,et al.  JPEG: Still Image Data Compression Standard , 1992 .

[44]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[45]  N. Graham,et al.  Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channels models. , 1971, Vision research.

[46]  A E Burgess Visual signal detection with two-component noise: low-pass spectrum effects. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[47]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Image discrimination models predict signal detection in natural medical image backgrounds , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[48]  Jay Bartroff,et al.  Automated computer evaluation and optimization of image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms for signal known exactly detection tasks. , 2003, Optics express.

[49]  R. Kruger,et al.  Scatter estimation for a digital radiographic system using convolution filtering. , 1987, Medical physics.

[50]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Model observers for signal-known-statistically tasks (SKS) , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[51]  E Samei,et al.  Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. , 1999, Radiology.

[52]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[53]  Majid Rabbani,et al.  An overview of the JPEG 2000 still image compression standard , 2002, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[54]  W. Geisler,et al.  Ideal discriminators in spatial vision: two-point stimuli. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[55]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  A Practical Guide to Model Observers for Visual Detection in Synthetic and Natural Noisy Images , 2000 .

[56]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[57]  M Eckstein,et al.  Observer performance for JPEG vs. Wavelet image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms. , 1999, Optics express.

[58]  A. M. Rohaly,et al.  Object detection in natural backgrounds predicted by discrimination performance and models , 1997, Vision Research.

[59]  Jeffrey Lubin,et al.  The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance , 1993 .

[60]  F. Campbell The human eye as an optical filter , 1968 .

[61]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.