Self‐archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences

Authors in different disciplines exhibit very different behaviours on the so‐called ‘green’ road to open access, i.e. self‐archiving. This study looks at the self‐archiving behaviour of authors publishing in leading journals in six social science disciplines. It tests the hypothesis that authors are self‐archiving according to the norms of their respective disciplines rather than following self‐archiving policies of publishers, and that, as a result, they are self‐archiving significant numbers of publisher PDF versions. It finds significant levels of self‐archiving, as well as significant self‐archiving of the publisher PDF version, in all the disciplines investigated. Publishers' self‐archiving policies have no influence on author self‐archiving practice.

[1]  Clifford A. Lynch,et al.  When documents deceive: Trust and provenance as new factors for information retrieval in a tangled web , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Jean-Claude Guédon,et al.  The “Green” and “Gold” Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching , 2004 .

[3]  Jean-Claude Guedon,et al.  The “Green” and “Gold” Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching , 2004 .

[4]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  Sally Morris,et al.  Defining and Certifying Electronic Publication in Science , 2000 .

[6]  Stephen S. Murray,et al.  Worldwide Use and Impact of the NASA Astrophysics Data System Digital Library , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Alma Swan,et al.  Open access self-archiving: An author study , 2005 .

[8]  Jean-Claude Guédon,et al.  In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing , 2005 .

[9]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  NEW JOURNAL PUBLISHING MODELS: AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF SENIOR RESEARCHERS , 2005 .

[10]  Michael Mabe,et al.  Dr Jekyll and Dr Hyde: author-reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing , 2002, Aslib Proc..

[11]  Ark Watkinson,et al.  Securing Authenticity of Scholarly Paternity and Integrity , 2003 .

[12]  Alma Swan,et al.  ‘WHAT AUTHORS WANT’: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals , 1999, Learn. Publ..

[13]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  RoMEO studies 4: an analysis of journal publishers' copyright agreements , 2003, Learn. Publ..

[14]  Jonathan D Wren,et al.  Open access and openly accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via the internet , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  David Goodman The Criteria for Open Access , 2004 .

[16]  R. Whitley The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[17]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  RoMEO studies 1: the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving , 2003, J. Documentation.

[18]  K. Antelman Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? , 2004 .